Connect with us
MARE BALTICUM Gaming & TECH Summit 2024

Fintech

DLP Resources Intersects 214m of 0.43% CuEq* (0.35% Cu, 113.88ppm Mo and 3.95g/t Ag) on the Aurora Project in Southern Peru

Published

on

Cranbrook, British Columbia–(Newsfile Corp. – December 5, 2022) – DLP Resources Inc. (TSXV: DLP) (OTCQB: DLPRF) (“DLP” or the “Company“) announces receipt of complete drill results for the first two holes, A22-001 and A22-002 on the Aurora porphyry copper-molybdenum project in southern Peru (Figure 1). In addition, hole A22-003 was completed to a depth of 702.30m on November 30.

Results for the initial 179.2m of Hole A22-001 were released on September 29, 2022 (see DLP Resources Inc. news release of September 29, 2022).

Highlights

In addition to the 123.35m (22.45m to 145.80m) of 0.54% CuEq* (0.49% Cu, 36.49ppm Mo and 4.20ppm Ag) intersected in A22-001 an additional 215.10m of 0.33% CuEq* (0.24% Cu, 167.96ppm Mo and 3.47g/t Ag), was intersected from 179.2m to 388m. The complete set of results for A22-001 are summarized in Table 1 below.

Hole A22-002 returned 214.40m (209m to 422.4m) with 0.43% CuEq* (0.35% Cu, 113.88ppm Mo and 3.95g/t Ag). Within this interval a higher-grade intersection of 52m (244m to 296m) returned 0.61% CuEq* (0.52% Cu, 130.55ppm Mo and 4.53g/t Ag). The complete set of results for A22-002 are summarized in Table 3 below.

Results from these first two holes on the Aurora project have confirmed this is a copper-molybdenum rich porphyry system with copper equivalent grades between 0.33% and 0.91% Cu (Table 1).

Hole A22-003 ended at 702.30m with visually encouraging copper and molybdenum mineralization observed throughout the hole. Samples are in the laboratory for assaying and results are expected at the end of December. Secondary enrichment of copper (chalcocite and covellite) is logged from 112m to 271m with molybdenite-rich veins throughout the lower 300m in quartz feldspar porphyry (see Figure 5).

Mr. Gendall President and CEO commented: “With geological information and results received for two of the three holes drilled to date we are extremely encouraged with the continued definition of the Aurora porphyry copper-molybdenum-silver system. This is a multiphase porphyry with higher grade copper mineralization observed in some narrow, earlier porphyry dykes at higher elevations. We will continue to target the higher-grade porphyry phases at depth”.

Aurora Cu-Mo Project – Summary of Drill Results for A22-001 and A22-002

A22-001

Hole A22-001 was drilled to the NE of the mapped porphyry and hornfels contact at an angle of 70 degrees towards an azimuth of 170 degrees (Table 2, Figures 2, 3 and 4). The logged geology is summarized as follows:

  • Partially leached polymictic breccia from 0.50m to 22.45m.
  • Mixed limonitic zone of partially leached sulphides consisting mainly of chalcopyrite and pyrite with copper oxides and secondary covellite and chalcocite on fractures in a polymictic breccia with occasional quartz-eye-feldspar porphyry down to 61.60m.
  • Mixed limonitic zone of partially leached sulphides (chalcopyrite and pyrite) in silicified siltstone, hornfels and brecciated hornfels with secondary covellite and chalcocite on sulphides and fractures down to 124.30m. Narrow 1-4m thick porphyry rock units cross-cut hornfels.
  • Quartz-eye-feldspar porphyry from 124.30m to 135.33m with limonite after chalcopyrite and pyrite and chalcocite and native copper at base of oxidation zone around 128.80m.
  • Silicified siltstone and hornfels with occasional porphyry intervals from 128.80m down to 172.90m with chalcopyrite and pyrite and secondary copper sulphides along fractures. A fault zone extends from approximately 145.80m to 172.90m.
  • Quartz-sericite altered hornfels, intrusive breccias and quartz-eye feldspar porphyry dykes of 4-7m wide in the upper 27m of the interval from 172.90m to 388.00m. Mineralization included disseminated chalcopyrite, molybdenite, pyrite and pyrrhotite.

Table 1. Summary of Initial Drill Results for Diamond Drill Hole A22-001. All grades are length-weighted averages of samples within the interval reported.

Hole From To Interval1 Description Cu (total) Mo Ag Cueq*
ID m m m % ppm ppm %
A22-001 0.50 22.45 21.95  Partially Leached 0.12 51.23 2.98 0.17
22.45 388.00 365.55  Oxidized/Mixed/Primary 0.33 114.16 3.64 0.41
Includes 22.45 145.80 123.35  Oxidized/Mixed 0.49 36.49 4.20 0.54
Includes 100.35 145.80 45.45  Enriched 0.64 17.41 3.40 0.68
Includes 100.35 124.30 23.95  Enriched 0.87 23.70 3.43 0.91
Includes 108.65 124.30 15.65  Enriched 1.09 32.75 3.00 1.10
145.80 172.90 21.10  #Fault zone/Mixed 0.23 68.79 1.16 0.27
172.90 388.00 215.10  Primary 0.24 167.96 3.47 0.33
Includes 298.85 326.00 27.15  Primary 0.48 31.15 7.01 0.56
Includes 366.00 388.00 22.00  Primary – Mo rich 0.21 573.45 1.43 0.42

 

Note: *Copper equivalent grades (CuEq) are for comparative purposes only. Calculations are uncut and recovery is assumed to be 100% for the first 145.80m and from 172.90m to 388m as the project is at an early stage of exploration and there is insufficient metallurgical data for estimation of metal recoveries.

# From 145.80m to 172.90m core recovery is estimated to be 78% of interval due to the fault zone and is “incomplete” and “not representative” of metal grades reported. Cueq value for this interval is “not representative”.

*Copper-equivalence is calculated as: CuEq (%) = Cu (%) + [3.55 × Mo (%)] + [0.0095 × Ag (g/t)], utilizing metal prices of Cu – US$3.34/lb, Mo – US$11.86/lb and Ag – US$21.87/oz.
1 Intervals are downhole drilled core lengths. Drilling data to date is insufficient to determine true width of mineralization. Assay values are uncut.

Table 2: A22-001 Diamond drill hole location, depth, orientation and dip.

Hole Easting Northing Elevation Length Azimuth Dip
ID m m Degrees Degrees
A22-001 190,082 8,566,230 2801 388 170 70

 

Co-ordinates are in WGS84 Zone 19S

A22-002

Hole A22-002 was drilled to the NE of the mapped porphyry and hornfels contact at an angle of 60 degrees towards an azimuth of 235 degrees (Table 4, Figures 2, 3 and 4). The logged geology is summarized as follows:

  • Leached hornfels, intermineral porphyry dyke and intrusive breccia from 0.10m to 89.40m. Quartz-sericite with intermediate argillic alteration predominates with limonite throughout. Limonite occurs throughout with trace sulphides of pyrite and chalcopyrite.
  • Partially leached zone within hornfels and intrusive breccias occur from 89.40m to 208.00m Mixed limonitic zone of partially leached sulphides consisting mainly of chalcopyrite and pyrite with secondary covellite and chalcocite on fractures in intrusive breccia. Molybdenite veinlets up to 2cm in width are scattered throughout. Sericite and intermediate argillic alteration predominate with limonite.
  • From 208.00m to 422.40 is a mixed zone of partially leached sulphides (chalcopyrite and pyrite) in quartz-sericite and intermediate argillic altered hornfels, intrusive breccias and quartz-eye feldspar porphyries with secondary covellite and chalcocite on sulphides and fractures from 208.00m to 251.3. Enriched copper zone.
  • Quartz-sericite with overprint of intermediate argillic alteration of hornfels, intrusive breccias and quartz-eye feldspar porphyry dykes of 4-20m wide occur throughout this interval from 251.3m to 422.40m. Mineralization included disseminated chalcopyrite, molybdenite, pyrite and pyrrhotite. Quartz veinlets occur throughout.
  • A late, poor mineralized quartz-eye feldspar porphyry and intermineral porphyry occur from 422.40m to 479.00m. Quartz-sericite alteration predominates with intermediate argillic overprint. Mineralization includes pyrite, chalcopyrite, molybdenite disseminated and in quartz veins in the intermineral quartz-eye feldspar porphyry.
  • In the last 82.60m of the hole from 479.00m to 561,60m a quartz-eye feldspar porphyry (intermineral) with abundant Mo veinlets is logged.

Table 3. Summary of Initial Drill Results for Diamond Drill Hole A22-002. All grades are length-weighted averages of samples within the interval reported.

Hole From To Interval1 Description Cu (total) Mo Ag Cueq*
ID m m m % ppm ppm %
A22-002 0.10 89.40 89.30  Leached 0.04 48.38 0.55 0.06
89.40 208.00 118.60  Partially Leached 0.22 67.24 2.53 0.26
208.00 422.40 214.40  Oxidized/Mixed/Primary 0.35 113.88 3.95 0.43
Includes 244.00 296.00 52.00  Primary 0.52 130.55 4.53 0.61
422.40 479.00 56.60  Primary (Late Porphyry) 0.09 72.09 1.29 0.13
479.00 561.60 82.60  Primary – Mo rich 0.19 349.49 1.34 0.33

 

Note: *Copper equivalent grades (CuEq) are for comparative purposes only. Calculations are uncut and recovery is assumed to be 100% for the 561.60m as the project is at an early stage of exploration and there is insufficient metallurgical data for estimation of metal recoveries.

*Copper-equivalence is calculated as: CuEq (%) = Cu (%) + [3.55 × Mo (%)] + [0.0095 × Ag (g/t)], utilizing metal prices of Cu – US$3.34/lb, Mo – US$11.86/lb and Ag – US$21.87/oz.
1 Intervals are downhole drilled core lengths. Drilling data to date is insufficient to determine true width of mineralization. Assay values are uncut.

Table 4: A22-002 Diamond drill hole location, depth, orientation and dip.

Hole Easting Northing Elevation Length Azimuth Dip
ID m m Degrees Degrees
A22-002 190,176 8,566,179 2885 561.6 235 60

 

Co-ordinates are in WGS84 Zone 19S

Quality Control and Quality Assurance

DLP Resources Peru S.A.C a subsidiary of DLP Resources Inc. supervises drilling and carries out sampling of HTW and NTW core. Logging and sampling are completed at a secured Company facility situated on the project site. Sample intervals are nominally 1.5 to 2m in length. Drill core is cut in half using a rotary diamond blade saw and samples are sealed on site before transportation to the ALS Peru S.A.C. sample preparation facility in Arequipa by Company vehicles and staff. Prepared samples are sent to Lima by ALS Peru S.A.C. for analysis. ALS Peru S.A.C. is an independent laboratory. Samples are analyzed for 48 elements using a four-acid digestion and ICP-MS analysis (ME-MS61). In addition, sequential copper analyses are done and reports, soluble copper using sulphuric acid leach, soluble copper in cyanide leach, residual copper and total copper. ALS meets all requirements of International Standards ISO/IEC 17025:2005 and ISO 9001:2015 for analytical procedures.

DLP Resources independently monitors quality control and quality assurance (“QA/QC”) through a program that includes the insertion of blind certified reference materials (standards), blanks and pulp duplicate samples. The company is not aware of any drilling, sampling, recovery or other factors that could materially affect the accuracy or reliability of the data reported to 145.80m in A22-001. From 145.80m to 172.90m in A22-001 core recovery is estimated to be 78% of the total sampled interval and data maybe considered to be “incomplete” and “not representative” for this interval.

Aurora Project

Aurora Project as an advanced stage porphyry copper-molybdenum exploration project in the Province of Calca, SE Peru (Figure 1). The Aurora Project was previously permitted for drilling in 2015 but was never executed. Thirteen historical drill holes, drilled in 2001 and 2005 totaling 3,900m were drilled over an area of approximately 1000m by 800m, cut significant intervals of copper and molybdenum mineralization. From logging of the only three remaining holes DDA-01, DDA-3A and DDA-3 and data now available, it appears that only three of the thirteen holes tested the enriched copper zone and only one hole drilled deep enough to test the primary copper and molybdenum zone (see DLP Resources Inc. news release of May 18, 2021)

Salient historic drill hole data of the Aurora Project are:

  • 190m @ 0.57% Cu, 0.008% Mo in DDA-1 with a high-grade intercept of 20m @ 1.01% Cu related to a supergene enrichment zone of secondary chalcocite;

  • 142m @ 0.5% Cu, 0.004% Mo in DDA-3;

  • 71.7m @ 0.7% Cu, 0.007% Mo in DDA-3A (see historical Focus Ventures Ltd. news release July 11, 2012); and

  • One of the historical holes ABC-6 drilled on the edge of the system intersected 64m @ 0.49% Cu and 0.087ppm Mo (Figure 2)

A review of the historical drilling indicates that the majority of the thirteen holes were drilled in the leached and partially leached zones of the porphyry system. Ten of the thirteen holes never fully tested the oxide and secondary enrichment zone and/or the primary copper zone at depth encountered in DDA-01. Copper-molybdenum mineralization is hosted by quartz-feldspar porphyries intruded into slates-hornfels and pelitic sandstones belonging to the Ordovician (439 – 463 ma) Sandia Formation.

Figure 2. Aurora Project – Simplified geology showing historic drilling and A22-001, A22-002 and A22-003 location

To view an enhanced version of Figure 2, please visit:

Figure 4: Aurora porphyry copper-molybdenum project – Drill core mineralization from A22-002

To view an enhanced version of Figure 4, please visit:
https://images.newsfilecorp.com/files/6456/146707_5d97ae92e4fda87c_004full.jpg

To view the source version of this press release, please visit https://www.newsfilecorp.com/release/146707

Fintech

How to identify authenticity in crypto influencer channels

Published

on

 

Modern brands stake on influencer marketing, with 76% of users making a purchase after seeing a product on social media.The cryptocurrency industry is no exception to this trend. However, promoting crypto products through influencer marketing can be particularly challenging. Crypto influencers pose a significant risk to a brand’s reputation and ROI due to rampant scams. Approximately 80% of channels provide fake statistics, including followers counts and engagement metrics. Additionally, this niche is characterized by high CPMs, which can increase the risk of financial loss for brands.

In this article Nadia Bubennnikova, Head of agency Famesters, will explore the most important things to look for in crypto channels to find the perfect match for influencer marketing collaborations.

 

  1. Comments 

There are several levels related to this point.

 

LEVEL 1

Analyze approximately 10 of the channel’s latest videos, looking through the comments to ensure they are not purchased from dubious sources. For example, such comments as “Yes sir, great video!”; “Thanks!”; “Love you man!”; “Quality content”, and others most certainly are bot-generated and should be avoided.

Just to compare: 

LEVEL 2

Don’t rush to conclude that you’ve discovered the perfect crypto channel just because you’ve come across some logical comments that align with the video’s topic. This may seem controversial, but it’s important to dive deeper. When you encounter a channel with logical comments, ensure that they are unique and not duplicated under the description box. Some creators are smarter than just buying comments from the first link that Google shows you when you search “buy YouTube comments”. They generate topics, provide multiple examples, or upload lists of examples, all produced by AI. You can either manually review the comments or use a script to parse all the YouTube comments into an Excel file. Then, add a formula to highlight any duplicates.

LEVEL 3

It is also a must to check the names of the profiles that leave the comments: most of the bot-generated comments are easy to track: they will all have the usernames made of random symbols and numbers, random first and last name combinations, “Habibi”, etc. No profile pictures on all comments is also a red flag.

 

LEVEL 4

Another important factor to consider when assessing comment authenticity is the posting date. If all the comments were posted on the same day, it’s likely that the traffic was purchased.

 

2. Average views number per video

This is indeed one of the key metrics to consider when selecting an influencer for collaboration, regardless of the product type. What specific factors should we focus on?

First & foremost: the views dynamics on the channel. The most desirable type of YouTube channel in terms of views is one that maintains stable viewership across all of its videos. This stability serves as proof of an active and loyal audience genuinely interested in the creator’s content, unlike channels where views vary significantly from one video to another.

Many unauthentic crypto channels not only buy YouTube comments but also invest in increasing video views to create the impression of stability. So, what exactly should we look at in terms of views? Firstly, calculate the average number of views based on the ten latest videos. Then, compare this figure to the views of the most recent videos posted within the past week. If you notice that these new videos have nearly the same number of views as those posted a month or two ago, it’s a clear red flag. Typically, a YouTube channel experiences lower views on new videos, with the number increasing organically each day as the audience engages with the content. If you see a video posted just three days ago already garnering 30k views, matching the total views of older videos, it’s a sign of fraudulent traffic purchased to create the illusion of view stability.

 

3. Influencer’s channel statistics

The primary statistics of interest are region and demographic split, and sometimes the device types of the viewers.

LEVEL 1

When reviewing the shared statistics, the first step is to request a video screencast instead of a simple screenshot. This is because it takes more time to organically edit a video than a screenshot, making it harder to manipulate the statistics. If the creator refuses, step two (if only screenshots are provided) is to download them and check the file’s properties on your computer. Look for details such as whether it was created with Adobe Photoshop or the color profile, typically Adobe RGB, to determine if the screenshot has been edited.

LEVEL 2

After confirming the authenticity of the stats screenshot, it’s crucial to analyze the data. For instance, if you’re examining a channel conducted in Spanish with all videos filmed in the same language, it would raise concerns to find a significant audience from countries like India or Turkey. This discrepancy, where the audience doesn’t align with regions known for speaking the language, is a red flag.

If we’re considering an English-language crypto channel, it typically suggests an international audience, as English’s global use for quality educational content on niche topics like crypto. However, certain considerations apply. For instance, if an English-speaking channel shows a significant percentage of Polish viewers (15% to 30%) without any mention of the Polish language, it could indicate fake followers and views. However, if the channel’s creator is Polish, occasionally posts videos in Polish alongside English, and receives Polish comments, it’s important not to rush to conclusions.

Example of statistics

 

Wrapping up

These are the main factors to consider when selecting an influencer to promote your crypto product. Once you’ve launched the campaign, there are also some markers to show which creators did bring the authentic traffic and which used some tools to create the illusion of an active and engaged audience. While this may seem obvious, it’s still worth mentioning. After the video is posted, allow 5-7 days for it to accumulate a basic number of views, then check performance metrics such as views, clicks, click-through rate (CTR), signups, and conversion rate (CR) from clicks to signups.

If you overlooked some red flags when selecting crypto channels for your launch, you might find the following outcomes: channels with high views numbers and high CTRs, demonstrating the real interest of the audience, yet with remarkably low conversion rates. In the worst-case scenario, you might witness thousands of clicks resulting in zero to just a few signups. While this might suggest technical issues in other industries, in crypto campaigns it indicates that the creator engaged in the campaign not only bought fake views and comments but also link clicks. And this happens more often than you may realize.

Summing up, choosing the right crypto creator to promote your product is indeed a tricky job that requires a lot of resources to be put into the search process. 

Author Nadia Bubennikova, Head of agency  at Famesters

Author

Nadia Bubennikova, Head of agency at Famesters

Continue Reading

Fintech

Central banks and the FinTech sector unite to change global payments space

Published

on

central-banks-and-the-fintech-sector-unite-to-change-global-payments-space

 

The BIS, along with seven leading central banks and a cohort of private financial firms, has embarked on an ambitious venture known as Project Agorá.

Named after the Greek word for “marketplace,” this initiative stands at the forefront of exploring the potential of tokenisation to significantly enhance the operational efficiency of the monetary system worldwide.

Central to this pioneering project are the Bank of France (on behalf of the Eurosystem), the Bank of Japan, the Bank of Korea, the Bank of Mexico, the Swiss National Bank, the Bank of England, and the Federal Reserve Bank of New York. These institutions have joined forces under the banner of Project Agorá, in partnership with an extensive assembly of private financial entities convened by the Institute of International Finance (IIF).

At the heart of Project Agorá is the pursuit of integrating tokenised commercial bank deposits with tokenised wholesale central bank money within a unified, public-private programmable financial platform. By harnessing the advanced capabilities of smart contracts and programmability, the project aspires to unlock new transactional possibilities that were previously infeasible or impractical, thereby fostering novel opportunities that could benefit businesses and consumers alike.

The collaborative effort seeks to address and surmount a variety of structural inefficiencies that currently plague cross-border payments. These challenges include disparate legal, regulatory, and technical standards; varying operating hours and time zones; and the heightened complexity associated with conducting financial integrity checks (such as anti-money laundering and customer verification procedures), which are often redundantly executed across multiple stages of a single transaction due to the involvement of several intermediaries.

As a beacon of experimental and exploratory projects, the BIS Innovation Hub is committed to delivering public goods to the global central banking community through initiatives like Project Agorá. In line with this mission, the BIS will soon issue a call for expressions of interest from private financial institutions eager to contribute to this ground-breaking project. The IIF will facilitate the involvement of private sector participants, extending an invitation to regulated financial institutions representing each of the seven aforementioned currencies to partake in this transformative endeavour.

Source: fintech.globa

The post Central banks and the FinTech sector unite to change global payments space appeared first on HIPTHER Alerts.

Continue Reading

Fintech

TD Bank inks multi-year strategic partnership with Google Cloud

Published

on

td-bank-inks-multi-year-strategic-partnership-with-google-cloud

 

TD Bank has inked a multi-year deal with Google Cloud as it looks to streamline the development and deployment of new products and services.

The deal will see the Canadian banking group integrate the vendor’s cloud services into a wider portion of its technology solutions portfolio, a move which TD expects will enable it “to respond quickly to changing customer expectations by rolling out new features, updates, or entirely new financial products at an accelerated pace”.

This marks an expansion of the already established relationship between TD Bank and Google Cloud after the group previously adopted the vendor’s Google Kubernetes Engine (GKE) for TD Securities Automated Trading (TDSAT), the Chicago-based subsidiary of its investment banking unit, TD Securities.

TDSAT uses GKE for process automation and quantitative modelling across fixed income markets, resulting in the development of a “data-driven research platform” capable of processing large research workloads in trading.

Dan Bosman, SVP and CIO of TD Securities, claims the infrastructure has so far supported TDSAT with “compute-intensive quantitative analysis” while expanding the subsidiary’s “trading volumes and portfolio size”.

TD’s new partnership with Google Cloud will see the group attempt to replicate the same level of success across its entire portfolio.

Source: fintechfutures.com

The post TD Bank inks multi-year strategic partnership with Google Cloud appeared first on HIPTHER Alerts.

Continue Reading

Trending