Connect with us
MARE BALTICUM Gaming & TECH Summit 2024

Fintech

SEC Proposes Rules to Extend Regulations ATS and SCI to Treasuries and Other Government Securities Markets

Published

on

Washington, D.C.–(Newsfile Corp. – September 28, 2020) – The Securities and Exchange Commission today announced a proposal to enhance the operational transparency, system integrity, and regulatory oversight for alternative trading systems (ATSs) that trade government securities as well as repurchase and reverse repurchase agreements on government securities (Government Securities ATSs) and issued a concept release soliciting public comment on the regulatory framework for electronic platforms that trade corporate debt and municipal securities.

“Today’s proposal is another fine example of the commitment of the Commission and the SEC staff to ensuring that the implementation of our time-tested regulatory framework keeps pace with market developments,” said Chairman Jay Clayton.  “Government Securities ATSs have become important to the functioning of our U.S. Treasury markets and this proposal, which benefited from input from the Treasury Department, would extend our transparency- and systems integrity-enhancing rules—Regulations ATS and SCI—to those markets.  I specifically want to thank Treasury staff and the many past and present senior Treasury officials for their insightful input and support for this effort.  The related concept release, which grew out of a recommendation by the SEC’s Fixed Income Market Structure Advisory Committee, will also enhance our understanding of the fixed income electronic trading space, including informing future modernization efforts.”

The U.S. government securities markets are among the most liquid and significant securities markets in the world.  Government securities, including U.S. Treasury securities and agency securities, make up more than half of the outstanding debt issuances in the U.S. bond market and play a critical role in the U.S. and global economies.  Over the last six months of 2019, the average daily trading volume in government securities was approximately $835 billion.

Over the years, ATSs have become increasingly important to government securities trading.  Under the proposal, all Government Securities ATSs would be required to comply with Regulation ATS.  The proposal would apply the investor protections Regulation ATS provides to such entities, such as the requirement to adopt written safeguards and written procedures to protect confidential subscriber information, and enable Commission oversight, including surveillance and examination, of these ATSs.  The proposal would also require an ATS with significant market share for U.S. Treasury securities or agency securities to provide fair access to trading on such ATS.

The proposal is also designed to increase transparency in the government securities markets by requiring Government Securities ATSs to file comprehensive public disclosures on new Form ATS-G.  Among other things, Form ATS-G would inform market participants about potential conflicts of interests arising from trading activity of the ATS’s broker-dealer operator or its affiliates, and the ATS’s manner of operations, such as order types, use of market data offered and used by the ATS, and fees.  The Commission would review Form ATS-G filings and have the ability to, after notice and opportunity for hearing, declare a Government Securities ATS’s Form ATS-G ineffective.

The Commission is also proposing to amend Regulation SCI to apply its provisions to ATSs that meet certain trading volume thresholds in U.S. Treasury securities or agency securities.  Regulation SCI requires SCI entities to have policies and procedures that are reasonably designed to ensure that their automated systems have adequate levels of security, including regular reviews and testing of systems to identify vulnerabilities.  The proposed amendments are intended to help to address technological vulnerabilities, and improve the Commission’s oversight of the core technology of key entities in the markets for government securities.   

In addition, the Commission is issuing a concept release arising out of the recent work of the Fixed Income Market Structure Advisory Committee.  The concept release focuses on the regulatory framework for electronic platforms that trade corporate debt and municipal securities, and the Commission is soliciting public comment to obtain information about fixed income electronic trading platforms, including their operations, services, fees, market data, and participants. 

* * *

FACT SHEET

Regulation of Government Securities ATSs:
Proposed Amendments to Regulation ATS and Regulation SCI
September 28, 2020

Current Regulatory Framework

Alternative trading systems (ATSs) are trading systems for securities that meet the definition of “exchange” under federal securities laws but are not required to register with the Commission as national securities exchanges if the ATSs comply with the conditions to an exemption provided under Regulation ATS.  Today, ATSs that trade only U.S. government securities as defined under Section 3(a)(42) of the Exchange Act (government securities) and register as broker-dealers or are banks are exempt from exchange registration and are not required to comply with Regulation ATS.  ATSs that trade both government securities and non-government debt securities (e.g., corporate bonds) are not subject to all the provisions of Regulation ATS, such as the heightened disclosure requirements under Rule 304 and the fair access requirements under Rule 301(b)(5) (Fair Access Rule), and are not subject to Regulation Systems Compliance and Integrity (Regulation SCI).  

Regulation ATS Proposed Amendments for Government Securities ATSs

The proposed amendments to Regulation ATS are designed to enhance operational transparency and protections for investors for ATSs that trade government securities or repurchase and reverse repurchase agreements on government securities (Government Securities ATSs).

  • Application of Regulation ATS to all Government Securities ATSs

The proposed amendments would eliminate the exemption from compliance with Regulation ATS for an ATS that limits its securities activities to government securities or repurchase and reverse repurchase agreements on government securities, and registers as a broker-dealer or is a bank.  As a result of the proposal, the following conditions of the Regulation ATS exemption would apply to all Government Securities ATSs:

Relevant Conditions to the ATS Exemption

Requirements for Government Securities ATSs

Rule 301(b)(1)

Register as a broker-dealer under Exchange Act Section 15 or a government securities broker or government securities dealer under Exchange Act Section 15C(a)(1)(A).

Rule 301(b)(5)

Comply with the Fair Access Rule under Rule 301(b)(5) if it meets a given threshold of trading in U.S. Treasury securities or in a debt security issued or guaranteed by a U.S. executive agency, as defined in 5 U.S.C. 105, or government-sponsored enterprise, as defined in 2 U.S.C. 622(8) (Agency Securities), as discussed in further detail below.

Rule 301(b)(7)

Cooperate with the Commission’s or an SRO’s inspection, examination, or investigation of the ATS or any of the ATS’s subscribers.

Rules 301(b)(8), 302, and 303

Make, keep current, and preserve certain records in accordance with Rules 302 and 303.

Rule 301(b)(9)

Periodically report certain information about trading activities on Form ATS-R.

Rule 301(b)(10)

Adopt written safeguards and written procedures to protect subscriber confidential trading information and separate ATS functions from other broker-dealer functions, including principal and customer trading.

Rule 301(b)(11)

Not use in its name the word “exchange” or derivations of the word “exchange.”

Rule 304

File and maintain public Form ATS-G, as discussed in further detail below.

  • Form ATS-G Disclosures and Commission Oversight

Form ATS-G would require a Government Securities ATS to publicly disclose on Form ATS-G information about its manner of operations and the ATS-related activities of the registered broker-dealer or government securities broker or dealer that operates the ATS (broker-dealer operator) and its affiliates, and is designed to allow market participants to assess conflict of interest and understand how their orders will interact, match, and execute in the ATS. 

Specifically, Form ATS-G would require a Government Securities ATS to disclose information regarding:

  • Its broker-dealer operator, including identifying information and ownership.
  • ATS-related activities of its broker-dealer operator, and the broker-dealer operator’s affiliates, including: 
    • the trading activities of the broker-dealer operator and its affiliates on the ATS;
    • whether subscribers to the ATS can opt out from interacting with orders and trading interest of the broker-dealer operator and its affiliates;
    • arrangements between the broker-dealer operator or its affiliates and other trading venues to access the ATS services;
    • products and services offered to ATS subscribers by the broker-dealer operator and its affiliates;
    • the activities of service providers to the broker-dealer operator and its affiliates; and
    • written safeguards and written procedures established to protect the confidential trading information of subscribers.
  • The manner of operations of the Government Securities ATS, including: 
    • types of subscribers, the criteria for eligibility for ATS services, and conditions for excluding subscribers from ATS services;
    • means of entry for orders and trading interest;
    • connectivity and co-location procedures;
    • order types, attributes, and order size requirements and procedures;
    • use of and conditions governing indications of interest;
    • hours of operations, opening, reopening, and closing processes, and procedures for trading outside of the ATS’s regular trading hours;
    • trading services, facilities, and rules of the ATS;
    • arrangements with any subscriber or the broker-dealer operator to provide liquidity;
    • segmentation of orders and trading interest and the provision of notice regarding segmentation;
    • counter-party selection;
    • display of orders and other trading interest;
    • functionalities or procedures to facilitate trading on, or source pricing for, the ATS using markets for financial instruments related to government securities;
    • fees;
    • procedures for stopping or suspending trading;
    • procedures regarding trade reporting, clearance, and settlement;
    • sources and uses of market data; and
    • aggregate platform-wide order flow and execution statistics provided by the ATS to one or more subscribers.

The proposed rules would also provide a process for the Commission to review Form ATS-G filings and, after notice and opportunity for hearing, declare Form ATS-G filings ineffective.  The proposed process is the same as the Commission’s process for the filing and review of Form ATS-N, with a modification to the circumstances under which the Commission could extend the review period for Form ATS-G and Form ATS-N. 

The Commission would make public a Government Securities ATS’s Form ATS-G when it becomes effective, as well as amendments to an effective Form ATS-G.  A Government Securities ATS would be required to file amendments, including material amendments, to its Form ATS-G.  As proposed, material amendments must be filed 30 calendar days prior to the implementation of the change and are made public upon the expiration of the 30 calendar day Commission review period, although a brief summary of the change will be made public upon filing.

In addition, each Government Securities ATS would be required to post on its website the most recently disseminated Form ATS-G, except for any amendment that the Commission has declared ineffective or that has been withdrawn. 

  • Fair Access Rule

The Commission also proposed to amend Regulation ATS to apply the Fair Access Rule to Government Securities ATSs that, during at least four of the preceding six calendar months, had (1) with respect to U.S. Treasury securities, five percent or more of the average weekly dollar volume traded in the U.S. as provided by the self-regulatory organization (SRO) to which such transactions are reported or (2) with respect to Agency Securities, five percent or more of the average daily dollar volume traded in the U.S. as provided by the SRO to which such transactions are reported.  The proposed amendment to the Fair Access Rule would help ensure the fair treatment of potential and current subscribers to Government Securities ATSs that consist of a large percentage of trading volume in government securities. 

Proposed Regulation SCI Amendments for Government Securities ATSs

The Commission proposed to amend Regulation SCI to expand the definition of “SCI alternative trading system” to include Government Securities ATSs that, during at least four of the preceding six calendar months, had (1) with respect to U.S. Treasury securities, five percent or more of the average weekly dollar volume traded in the U.S. as provided by the SRO to which such transactions are reported or (2) with respect to Agency Securities, five percent or more of the average daily dollar volume traded in the U.S. as provided by the SRO to which such transactions are reported.  A Government Securities ATS that meets the proposed amended definition of “SCI alternative trading system” would fall within the definition of “SCI entity” and, as a result, would be subject to the requirements of Regulation SCI.  The amendments to Regulation SCI would help to address the technological vulnerabilities, and improve the Commission’s oversight, of the core technology of key entities in the markets for government securities.

Regulation ATS Amendments for NMS Stock ATSs and ATSs that Trade Other Securities

The Commission proposed to amend Regulation ATS to:

  • Require that Form ATS and Form ATS-R be filed with the Commission electronically through EDGAR and modernize both forms;
  • Eliminate confidential treatment of the types of securities that an ATS trades as disclosed on the ATS’s Form ATS and Form ATS-R;
  • Update and correct Form ATS-N;
  • Require NMS Stock ATSs to post on their websites the most recently disseminated Form ATS-N, except for any amendment that the Commission has declared ineffective or that has been withdrawn; and 
  • Remove the exclusion from compliance with the Fair Access Rule and Rule 301(b)(6) under Regulation ATS for an ATS that matches non-displayed customer orders using prices disseminated by an effective transaction reporting plan.

What’s Next?

The proposal will be published on the Commission’s website and in the Federal Register.  There will be a 60-day comment period following publication in the Federal Register.

The Commission will also consider comments on the concept release on the regulatory framework for electronic platforms that trade corporate bonds and municipal securities.

Fintech

How to identify authenticity in crypto influencer channels

Published

on

 

Modern brands stake on influencer marketing, with 76% of users making a purchase after seeing a product on social media.The cryptocurrency industry is no exception to this trend. However, promoting crypto products through influencer marketing can be particularly challenging. Crypto influencers pose a significant risk to a brand’s reputation and ROI due to rampant scams. Approximately 80% of channels provide fake statistics, including followers counts and engagement metrics. Additionally, this niche is characterized by high CPMs, which can increase the risk of financial loss for brands.

In this article Nadia Bubennnikova, Head of agency Famesters, will explore the most important things to look for in crypto channels to find the perfect match for influencer marketing collaborations.

 

  1. Comments 

There are several levels related to this point.

 

LEVEL 1

Analyze approximately 10 of the channel’s latest videos, looking through the comments to ensure they are not purchased from dubious sources. For example, such comments as “Yes sir, great video!”; “Thanks!”; “Love you man!”; “Quality content”, and others most certainly are bot-generated and should be avoided.

Just to compare: 

LEVEL 2

Don’t rush to conclude that you’ve discovered the perfect crypto channel just because you’ve come across some logical comments that align with the video’s topic. This may seem controversial, but it’s important to dive deeper. When you encounter a channel with logical comments, ensure that they are unique and not duplicated under the description box. Some creators are smarter than just buying comments from the first link that Google shows you when you search “buy YouTube comments”. They generate topics, provide multiple examples, or upload lists of examples, all produced by AI. You can either manually review the comments or use a script to parse all the YouTube comments into an Excel file. Then, add a formula to highlight any duplicates.

LEVEL 3

It is also a must to check the names of the profiles that leave the comments: most of the bot-generated comments are easy to track: they will all have the usernames made of random symbols and numbers, random first and last name combinations, “Habibi”, etc. No profile pictures on all comments is also a red flag.

 

LEVEL 4

Another important factor to consider when assessing comment authenticity is the posting date. If all the comments were posted on the same day, it’s likely that the traffic was purchased.

 

2. Average views number per video

This is indeed one of the key metrics to consider when selecting an influencer for collaboration, regardless of the product type. What specific factors should we focus on?

First & foremost: the views dynamics on the channel. The most desirable type of YouTube channel in terms of views is one that maintains stable viewership across all of its videos. This stability serves as proof of an active and loyal audience genuinely interested in the creator’s content, unlike channels where views vary significantly from one video to another.

Many unauthentic crypto channels not only buy YouTube comments but also invest in increasing video views to create the impression of stability. So, what exactly should we look at in terms of views? Firstly, calculate the average number of views based on the ten latest videos. Then, compare this figure to the views of the most recent videos posted within the past week. If you notice that these new videos have nearly the same number of views as those posted a month or two ago, it’s a clear red flag. Typically, a YouTube channel experiences lower views on new videos, with the number increasing organically each day as the audience engages with the content. If you see a video posted just three days ago already garnering 30k views, matching the total views of older videos, it’s a sign of fraudulent traffic purchased to create the illusion of view stability.

 

3. Influencer’s channel statistics

The primary statistics of interest are region and demographic split, and sometimes the device types of the viewers.

LEVEL 1

When reviewing the shared statistics, the first step is to request a video screencast instead of a simple screenshot. This is because it takes more time to organically edit a video than a screenshot, making it harder to manipulate the statistics. If the creator refuses, step two (if only screenshots are provided) is to download them and check the file’s properties on your computer. Look for details such as whether it was created with Adobe Photoshop or the color profile, typically Adobe RGB, to determine if the screenshot has been edited.

LEVEL 2

After confirming the authenticity of the stats screenshot, it’s crucial to analyze the data. For instance, if you’re examining a channel conducted in Spanish with all videos filmed in the same language, it would raise concerns to find a significant audience from countries like India or Turkey. This discrepancy, where the audience doesn’t align with regions known for speaking the language, is a red flag.

If we’re considering an English-language crypto channel, it typically suggests an international audience, as English’s global use for quality educational content on niche topics like crypto. However, certain considerations apply. For instance, if an English-speaking channel shows a significant percentage of Polish viewers (15% to 30%) without any mention of the Polish language, it could indicate fake followers and views. However, if the channel’s creator is Polish, occasionally posts videos in Polish alongside English, and receives Polish comments, it’s important not to rush to conclusions.

Example of statistics

 

Wrapping up

These are the main factors to consider when selecting an influencer to promote your crypto product. Once you’ve launched the campaign, there are also some markers to show which creators did bring the authentic traffic and which used some tools to create the illusion of an active and engaged audience. While this may seem obvious, it’s still worth mentioning. After the video is posted, allow 5-7 days for it to accumulate a basic number of views, then check performance metrics such as views, clicks, click-through rate (CTR), signups, and conversion rate (CR) from clicks to signups.

If you overlooked some red flags when selecting crypto channels for your launch, you might find the following outcomes: channels with high views numbers and high CTRs, demonstrating the real interest of the audience, yet with remarkably low conversion rates. In the worst-case scenario, you might witness thousands of clicks resulting in zero to just a few signups. While this might suggest technical issues in other industries, in crypto campaigns it indicates that the creator engaged in the campaign not only bought fake views and comments but also link clicks. And this happens more often than you may realize.

Summing up, choosing the right crypto creator to promote your product is indeed a tricky job that requires a lot of resources to be put into the search process. 

Author Nadia Bubennikova, Head of agency  at Famesters

Author

Nadia Bubennikova, Head of agency at Famesters

Continue Reading

Fintech

Central banks and the FinTech sector unite to change global payments space

Published

on

central-banks-and-the-fintech-sector-unite-to-change-global-payments-space

 

The BIS, along with seven leading central banks and a cohort of private financial firms, has embarked on an ambitious venture known as Project Agorá.

Named after the Greek word for “marketplace,” this initiative stands at the forefront of exploring the potential of tokenisation to significantly enhance the operational efficiency of the monetary system worldwide.

Central to this pioneering project are the Bank of France (on behalf of the Eurosystem), the Bank of Japan, the Bank of Korea, the Bank of Mexico, the Swiss National Bank, the Bank of England, and the Federal Reserve Bank of New York. These institutions have joined forces under the banner of Project Agorá, in partnership with an extensive assembly of private financial entities convened by the Institute of International Finance (IIF).

At the heart of Project Agorá is the pursuit of integrating tokenised commercial bank deposits with tokenised wholesale central bank money within a unified, public-private programmable financial platform. By harnessing the advanced capabilities of smart contracts and programmability, the project aspires to unlock new transactional possibilities that were previously infeasible or impractical, thereby fostering novel opportunities that could benefit businesses and consumers alike.

The collaborative effort seeks to address and surmount a variety of structural inefficiencies that currently plague cross-border payments. These challenges include disparate legal, regulatory, and technical standards; varying operating hours and time zones; and the heightened complexity associated with conducting financial integrity checks (such as anti-money laundering and customer verification procedures), which are often redundantly executed across multiple stages of a single transaction due to the involvement of several intermediaries.

As a beacon of experimental and exploratory projects, the BIS Innovation Hub is committed to delivering public goods to the global central banking community through initiatives like Project Agorá. In line with this mission, the BIS will soon issue a call for expressions of interest from private financial institutions eager to contribute to this ground-breaking project. The IIF will facilitate the involvement of private sector participants, extending an invitation to regulated financial institutions representing each of the seven aforementioned currencies to partake in this transformative endeavour.

Source: fintech.globa

The post Central banks and the FinTech sector unite to change global payments space appeared first on HIPTHER Alerts.

Continue Reading

Fintech

TD Bank inks multi-year strategic partnership with Google Cloud

Published

on

td-bank-inks-multi-year-strategic-partnership-with-google-cloud

 

TD Bank has inked a multi-year deal with Google Cloud as it looks to streamline the development and deployment of new products and services.

The deal will see the Canadian banking group integrate the vendor’s cloud services into a wider portion of its technology solutions portfolio, a move which TD expects will enable it “to respond quickly to changing customer expectations by rolling out new features, updates, or entirely new financial products at an accelerated pace”.

This marks an expansion of the already established relationship between TD Bank and Google Cloud after the group previously adopted the vendor’s Google Kubernetes Engine (GKE) for TD Securities Automated Trading (TDSAT), the Chicago-based subsidiary of its investment banking unit, TD Securities.

TDSAT uses GKE for process automation and quantitative modelling across fixed income markets, resulting in the development of a “data-driven research platform” capable of processing large research workloads in trading.

Dan Bosman, SVP and CIO of TD Securities, claims the infrastructure has so far supported TDSAT with “compute-intensive quantitative analysis” while expanding the subsidiary’s “trading volumes and portfolio size”.

TD’s new partnership with Google Cloud will see the group attempt to replicate the same level of success across its entire portfolio.

Source: fintechfutures.com

The post TD Bank inks multi-year strategic partnership with Google Cloud appeared first on HIPTHER Alerts.

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Advertisement

Latest news

Trending