Connect with us
MARE BALTICUM Gaming & TECH Summit 2024

Fintech

Fancamp Stalls AGM Again, Denies Shareholder’s Their Right to Vote and Continues to Waste Money

Published

on

  • Concerned Shareholders are outraged by entrenched board and management’s continued disregard for shareholder rights and shareholder democracy with their last-minute postponement of the AGM scheduled for June 29,2021.
  • Concerned Shareholders condemn the improper waste of shareholder’s money on legal manoeuvring undertaken solely to further entrench themselves.
  • Concerned Shareholders demand that Fancamp provide all shareholders as of the current record date May 28, 2021, the opportunity to vote at a fair and transparent AGM.
  • Concerned Shareholders respond to the Open Letter to the Concerned Shareholders nominees.
  • Concerned Shareholders wish to thank shareholders who have submitted their proxies and the overwhelming support that has been given to date on the GREEN proxy.

Montreal, Quebec–(Newsfile Corp. – June 21, 2021) – Incumbent director of Fancamp, Dr. Peter H. Smith, who, together with joint actors James Hunter and his affiliates, Mark Fekete and Heather Hannan, (the “Concerned Shareholders“) hold in aggregate, directly and indirectly an aggregate of 22,285,597 shares, representing approximately 12.63% of Fancamp Exploration Ltd.’s (“Fancamp” or the “Company“) issued and outstanding common shares, are utterly outraged and frustrated with the continued misrepresentation and lack of respect for shareholder’s rights and shareholder democracy that is continually exhibited by the entrenched board and management of Fancamp.

On Wednesday, June 16, 2021, a petition was filed in court to ensure that the shareholders of Fancamp have a fair annual general meeting (“AGM“). The petition was made because the entrenched board and management have steadfastly refused to respond to commonplace reasonable requests made by the Concerned Shareholders with respect to the conduct of the AGM aimed at ensuring that ALL shareholders are entitled to vote for the election of their chosen nominees to the Company’s board. The entrenched board and management simply cannot be trusted to maintain the integrity of a fair and transparent AGM. Rather than address the issues clearly outlined in multiple letters to the Company, and ultimately set forth in Dr. Smith’s petition, Fancamp chose to continue to deny shareholders a fair and timely AGM and to avoid accountability for their arrogant, greedy, value destroying actions. Following a hearing on Friday June 18, 2021, to allow the hearing of the petition prior to the AGM date, the entrenched board and management have shown their true colours by cowardly issuing a press release on Saturday afternoon announcing a postponement of the AGM which allow them to escape the criticism and negative feedback they will undoubtedly receive for again defiantly delaying the AGM in an attempt to entrench themselves further. To be clear – regardless of the intention or competence of the Company to respond in a timely manner – if the Company plans to comply with the rules of court in response to the petition, there is no requirement under applicable corporate law to change the record date for the AGM or delay the meeting date for the AGM beyond July 26, 2021.

This latest delay to the AGM is another tactic in an expensive and vicious campaign to discredit, exhaust and outlast Dr. Smith in his efforts on behalf of ALL shareholders. Fancamp cynically disparages Dr. Smith’s actions as costly and unnecessary but has scornfully misappropriated Company funds to engage the services of FOUR law firms, KPMG and Kingsdale Advisors in order to intimidate Dr. Smith. However, they have the nerve to state that if the Concerned Shareholders are successful that they should not reimburse themselves for their reasonable expense which is a legal right afforded to them. Dean Journeaux and Charles Tarnocai, as incoming management nominees, should take note and be wary of the abuse of shareholder rights and the bullying, harassment and coercion Dr. Smith has endured simply for advocating for a fair and timely AGM, or at the least, the right of shareholders to vote on the dilutive, conflicted transaction with ScoZinc Mining Ltd. (the “ScoZinc Transaction“).

As the Company has stated in their press release dated June 19, 2021, they have rejected our request for shareholder democracy which forced the Concerned Shareholders to make this petition. Because the Company has simply refused, we have asked for commonplace procedures aimed at ensuring that all shareholder have the right to vote for the board nominees of their choice, a rejection of automated voting that the courts have previously stated are improper in the course of a contested proxy solicitation, provision of the documentation required to be provided by the Company signed by management nominees prior to the AGM under the outdated and unconfirmed advance notice policy, and the appointment of an independent chair for this highly charged meeting. The truth is the use of the petition as the reason for the delay is another one of the many smoke and mirror tactics the entrenched board and management are weaponizing to further unjustly preserve their position to further destroy shareholder value while enriching themselves. As shareholder support for the Concerned Shareholder nominees has been decisive and overwhelming, it has become apparent to the entrenched board and management that shareholders have let their voices be heard in rebuke of management’s arrogant disregard of shareholders best interests and egregious endorsement of the highly dilutive, self-serving and non-arm’s length ScoZinc Transaction. As the entrenched board and management are now well aware, that they cannot win this proxy fight; they do not have the requisite shareholder votes and they are now using this as an excuse to adjourn the meeting.

The TSX Venture Exchange Inc. (the “TSXV“), in granting conditional approval of the Scozinc Transaction. also required the Company to hold the Meeting as soon as possible and, in any event, at least two days prior to the closing of the Arrangement. The Company is in breach of section 4.1 of Exchange Policy 3.2 which states:

Every Issuer must hold an annual meeting of its Shareholders by the earlier of the time required by applicable corporate or securities legislation and 18 months after:

(a) the date of its incorporation; or

(b) the date of its certificate of amalgamation, in the case of an amalgamated Issuer,

and subsequently thereafter in each year not more than 15 months after its last preceding annual meeting of Shareholders or such earlier date as required by applicable corporate or Securities Laws.

The last AGM was held in October, 2019, which is 20 months ago. Not only is the Company in breach of this TSXV requirement, this continuing breach further highlights the lack of respect for shareholder democracy.

It is evident that this proposed adjournment is being utilized as a defensive measure. Fancamp knows it does not have the votes to win the proxy fight as Dr. Smith has received overwhelming support through the proxies received to date. Accordingly, Fancamp is proposing to adjourn to try to figure out a scheme to garner more votes to attempt to entrench themselves further. This flies in the face of shareholder democracy and is an utter disrespect of the TSXV rules and policies.

Further, Fancamp is trying to “financially ruin” Dr. Smith as it has threatened previously through the multiple actions and complaints that it has brought against him, the unreasonable positions it has taken with respect to the conduct of the AGM and the costs that the Company is making him incur.

Well, we are putting the entrenched board and management on notice that we will challenge them every step of the way in the name of shareholder democracy, and will continue to fight for a fair and transparent AGM that maintains integrity of the process without any further delays.

FANCAMP’S OPEN LETTER TO CONCERNED SHAREHOLDERS NOMINEES

The Concerned Shareholders saw the news release that was issued by the Company and strongly oppose the Open Letter. Initially the Concerned Shareholders position was to ignore the rhetoric and not even respond to the letter as it has been responded to in our press releases dated May 28, June 8 and June 14. The entrenched board and management’s continued pursuit of asking rhetorical questions that add no value only highlights that they have made a decision to try to impugn Dr. Smith’s reputation. Nowhere do they try to stick to the issues at hand to either (a) explain to shareholders why the ScoZinc Transaction is in their best interest which justifies the massive dilution serving only the purpose of enriching and entrenching themselves or (b) why it is that the entrenched board and a management nominees are the right people for the future of Fancamp. The answer is because they know that the ScoZinc Transaction is not in the best interest of ALL shareholders and the fact that their nominees are not positioned to be stewards of YOUR money, they have decided to unnecessarily bully and harass an 80+ year old man and try to financially ruin him simply because he was brave enough to stand up for shareholder democracy.

The truth is this could have been avoided if the entrenched board and management exercised their fiduciary duties, respected shareholder democracy and respected your rights and had the AGM back in October 2020 and/or allowed shareholders to have a say on the ScoZinc Transaction. However, they did not do either so what does that say about them?

We will turn the spotlight on the entrenched board and management and ask the new Fancamp nominees whether they are truly aware of what has transpired to date? Are they aware that the entrenched board and management in the face of a proxy fight have spit in the face of shareholder democracy and shareholder rights to adjourn a meeting when it has been 20 months since the last one? Were you aware that the cowards issued a press release on a Saturday announcing the adjournment of the AGM so they would not face any scrutiny or public criticism? Have you asked the right questions about your board? Have you asked Mr. Mehra why his tenure at Glencore International PLC was so short? Why was he the shortest tenured Chair of the International School of Zug and Luzern or why is it so eerily familiar the allegations being made by the Concerned Shareholders and the then concerned shareholders of GT Gold Corporation (“GT Gold”) about Mr. Mehra’s complete disregard for shareholder democracy. Mr. Mehra was only saved from an embarrassing loss and embarrassing stories about his conduct by the acquisition of GT Gold by Newmont Corporation. As far as we know this is the first time in Canadian history that one man was subject to two proxy fights at the same time.

Shareholders are urged to stop the entrenched board and management from further entrenching themselves by voting your GREEN form of proxy today or no later than 5:00 pm (Toronto Time) on Thursday June 24, 2021.

Advisors

Farris LLP are acting as legal advisors to Dr. Peter Smith and Gryphon Advisors Inc., are acting as their strategic shareholder communications and proxy advisor. Gryphon’s responsibility will include providing strategic advice and advising the Concerned Shareholders with respect to the Meeting and proxy protocol.

The registered address of Fancamp is located at 3200 – 650 West Georgia Street, Vancouver, BC, V6B 4P7. The mailing and head office address of Fancamp is 7290 Gray Avenue, Burnaby, British Columbia V5J 3Z2. A copy of this press release may be obtained on Fancamp’s SEDAR profile at www.sedar.com.

For more information regarding the Concerned Shareholders’ position please contact:
Gryphon Advisors Inc.
Tel: 1-833-461-3651
Email: [email protected]

To view the source version of this press release, please visit https://www.newsfilecorp.com/release/88123

Fintech

How to identify authenticity in crypto influencer channels

Published

on

 

Modern brands stake on influencer marketing, with 76% of users making a purchase after seeing a product on social media.The cryptocurrency industry is no exception to this trend. However, promoting crypto products through influencer marketing can be particularly challenging. Crypto influencers pose a significant risk to a brand’s reputation and ROI due to rampant scams. Approximately 80% of channels provide fake statistics, including followers counts and engagement metrics. Additionally, this niche is characterized by high CPMs, which can increase the risk of financial loss for brands.

In this article Nadia Bubennnikova, Head of agency Famesters, will explore the most important things to look for in crypto channels to find the perfect match for influencer marketing collaborations.

 

  1. Comments 

There are several levels related to this point.

 

LEVEL 1

Analyze approximately 10 of the channel’s latest videos, looking through the comments to ensure they are not purchased from dubious sources. For example, such comments as “Yes sir, great video!”; “Thanks!”; “Love you man!”; “Quality content”, and others most certainly are bot-generated and should be avoided.

Just to compare: 

LEVEL 2

Don’t rush to conclude that you’ve discovered the perfect crypto channel just because you’ve come across some logical comments that align with the video’s topic. This may seem controversial, but it’s important to dive deeper. When you encounter a channel with logical comments, ensure that they are unique and not duplicated under the description box. Some creators are smarter than just buying comments from the first link that Google shows you when you search “buy YouTube comments”. They generate topics, provide multiple examples, or upload lists of examples, all produced by AI. You can either manually review the comments or use a script to parse all the YouTube comments into an Excel file. Then, add a formula to highlight any duplicates.

LEVEL 3

It is also a must to check the names of the profiles that leave the comments: most of the bot-generated comments are easy to track: they will all have the usernames made of random symbols and numbers, random first and last name combinations, “Habibi”, etc. No profile pictures on all comments is also a red flag.

 

LEVEL 4

Another important factor to consider when assessing comment authenticity is the posting date. If all the comments were posted on the same day, it’s likely that the traffic was purchased.

 

2. Average views number per video

This is indeed one of the key metrics to consider when selecting an influencer for collaboration, regardless of the product type. What specific factors should we focus on?

First & foremost: the views dynamics on the channel. The most desirable type of YouTube channel in terms of views is one that maintains stable viewership across all of its videos. This stability serves as proof of an active and loyal audience genuinely interested in the creator’s content, unlike channels where views vary significantly from one video to another.

Many unauthentic crypto channels not only buy YouTube comments but also invest in increasing video views to create the impression of stability. So, what exactly should we look at in terms of views? Firstly, calculate the average number of views based on the ten latest videos. Then, compare this figure to the views of the most recent videos posted within the past week. If you notice that these new videos have nearly the same number of views as those posted a month or two ago, it’s a clear red flag. Typically, a YouTube channel experiences lower views on new videos, with the number increasing organically each day as the audience engages with the content. If you see a video posted just three days ago already garnering 30k views, matching the total views of older videos, it’s a sign of fraudulent traffic purchased to create the illusion of view stability.

 

3. Influencer’s channel statistics

The primary statistics of interest are region and demographic split, and sometimes the device types of the viewers.

LEVEL 1

When reviewing the shared statistics, the first step is to request a video screencast instead of a simple screenshot. This is because it takes more time to organically edit a video than a screenshot, making it harder to manipulate the statistics. If the creator refuses, step two (if only screenshots are provided) is to download them and check the file’s properties on your computer. Look for details such as whether it was created with Adobe Photoshop or the color profile, typically Adobe RGB, to determine if the screenshot has been edited.

LEVEL 2

After confirming the authenticity of the stats screenshot, it’s crucial to analyze the data. For instance, if you’re examining a channel conducted in Spanish with all videos filmed in the same language, it would raise concerns to find a significant audience from countries like India or Turkey. This discrepancy, where the audience doesn’t align with regions known for speaking the language, is a red flag.

If we’re considering an English-language crypto channel, it typically suggests an international audience, as English’s global use for quality educational content on niche topics like crypto. However, certain considerations apply. For instance, if an English-speaking channel shows a significant percentage of Polish viewers (15% to 30%) without any mention of the Polish language, it could indicate fake followers and views. However, if the channel’s creator is Polish, occasionally posts videos in Polish alongside English, and receives Polish comments, it’s important not to rush to conclusions.

Example of statistics

 

Wrapping up

These are the main factors to consider when selecting an influencer to promote your crypto product. Once you’ve launched the campaign, there are also some markers to show which creators did bring the authentic traffic and which used some tools to create the illusion of an active and engaged audience. While this may seem obvious, it’s still worth mentioning. After the video is posted, allow 5-7 days for it to accumulate a basic number of views, then check performance metrics such as views, clicks, click-through rate (CTR), signups, and conversion rate (CR) from clicks to signups.

If you overlooked some red flags when selecting crypto channels for your launch, you might find the following outcomes: channels with high views numbers and high CTRs, demonstrating the real interest of the audience, yet with remarkably low conversion rates. In the worst-case scenario, you might witness thousands of clicks resulting in zero to just a few signups. While this might suggest technical issues in other industries, in crypto campaigns it indicates that the creator engaged in the campaign not only bought fake views and comments but also link clicks. And this happens more often than you may realize.

Summing up, choosing the right crypto creator to promote your product is indeed a tricky job that requires a lot of resources to be put into the search process. 

Author Nadia Bubennikova, Head of agency  at Famesters

Author

Nadia Bubennikova, Head of agency at Famesters

Continue Reading

Fintech

Central banks and the FinTech sector unite to change global payments space

Published

on

central-banks-and-the-fintech-sector-unite-to-change-global-payments-space

 

The BIS, along with seven leading central banks and a cohort of private financial firms, has embarked on an ambitious venture known as Project Agorá.

Named after the Greek word for “marketplace,” this initiative stands at the forefront of exploring the potential of tokenisation to significantly enhance the operational efficiency of the monetary system worldwide.

Central to this pioneering project are the Bank of France (on behalf of the Eurosystem), the Bank of Japan, the Bank of Korea, the Bank of Mexico, the Swiss National Bank, the Bank of England, and the Federal Reserve Bank of New York. These institutions have joined forces under the banner of Project Agorá, in partnership with an extensive assembly of private financial entities convened by the Institute of International Finance (IIF).

At the heart of Project Agorá is the pursuit of integrating tokenised commercial bank deposits with tokenised wholesale central bank money within a unified, public-private programmable financial platform. By harnessing the advanced capabilities of smart contracts and programmability, the project aspires to unlock new transactional possibilities that were previously infeasible or impractical, thereby fostering novel opportunities that could benefit businesses and consumers alike.

The collaborative effort seeks to address and surmount a variety of structural inefficiencies that currently plague cross-border payments. These challenges include disparate legal, regulatory, and technical standards; varying operating hours and time zones; and the heightened complexity associated with conducting financial integrity checks (such as anti-money laundering and customer verification procedures), which are often redundantly executed across multiple stages of a single transaction due to the involvement of several intermediaries.

As a beacon of experimental and exploratory projects, the BIS Innovation Hub is committed to delivering public goods to the global central banking community through initiatives like Project Agorá. In line with this mission, the BIS will soon issue a call for expressions of interest from private financial institutions eager to contribute to this ground-breaking project. The IIF will facilitate the involvement of private sector participants, extending an invitation to regulated financial institutions representing each of the seven aforementioned currencies to partake in this transformative endeavour.

Source: fintech.globa

The post Central banks and the FinTech sector unite to change global payments space appeared first on HIPTHER Alerts.

Continue Reading

Fintech

TD Bank inks multi-year strategic partnership with Google Cloud

Published

on

td-bank-inks-multi-year-strategic-partnership-with-google-cloud

 

TD Bank has inked a multi-year deal with Google Cloud as it looks to streamline the development and deployment of new products and services.

The deal will see the Canadian banking group integrate the vendor’s cloud services into a wider portion of its technology solutions portfolio, a move which TD expects will enable it “to respond quickly to changing customer expectations by rolling out new features, updates, or entirely new financial products at an accelerated pace”.

This marks an expansion of the already established relationship between TD Bank and Google Cloud after the group previously adopted the vendor’s Google Kubernetes Engine (GKE) for TD Securities Automated Trading (TDSAT), the Chicago-based subsidiary of its investment banking unit, TD Securities.

TDSAT uses GKE for process automation and quantitative modelling across fixed income markets, resulting in the development of a “data-driven research platform” capable of processing large research workloads in trading.

Dan Bosman, SVP and CIO of TD Securities, claims the infrastructure has so far supported TDSAT with “compute-intensive quantitative analysis” while expanding the subsidiary’s “trading volumes and portfolio size”.

TD’s new partnership with Google Cloud will see the group attempt to replicate the same level of success across its entire portfolio.

Source: fintechfutures.com

The post TD Bank inks multi-year strategic partnership with Google Cloud appeared first on HIPTHER Alerts.

Continue Reading

Trending