Connect with us
MARE BALTICUM Gaming & TECH Summit 2024

Fintech

Peter H. Smith and The Concerned Shareholders of Fancamp Provide an Accurate Update on Petition Decision and Remind Shareholders of Management’s Entrenchment Patterns and Continued Destruction of Shareholder Value

Published

on

Reading Time: 7 minutes

  • Press Release issued on September 7th by the entrenched board and management is purposely deceitful as it portrays an incomplete picture of the decision rendered by the Supreme Court of British Columbia
  • Court reinforces voting record date must remain the same and notes the TSX Venture Exchange has required that Fancamp hold its AGM at least two clear business days before closing the ScoZinc Arrangement
  • Reminds Shareholders that the Entrenched Board and Management have consistently refused to hold the AGM in efforts to thwart shareholder democracy and continue to not announce a meeting date
  • Shareholders are urged to stop Management from further entrenchment and destruction of shareholder value by continuing to vote the GREEN form of proxy and to resist desperate inducements to change their votes
  • The Concerned Shareholders would like to thank the true owners of Fancamp for their tremendous support and patience to date and are confident enough votes have already been cast on GREEN to win the vote

Montreal, Quebec–(Newsfile Corp. – September 8, 2021) – Incumbent director of Fancamp Exploration Ltd. (“Fancamp” or the “Company”), Dr. Peter H. Smith, who, together with joint actors, James Hunter and his affiliates, Mark Fekete and Heather Hannan, (the “Concerned Shareholders”) hold in aggregate, directly and indirectly an aggregate of 22,285,597 shares, representing approximately 12.63% of Fancamp’s issued and outstanding common shares, want to update shareholders on recent events impacting the long overdue 2020 annual general meeting of shareholders (the “AGM”) originally scheduled for June 29, 2021, but delayed indefinitely by the incumbent directors and officers excluding Dr. Smith (the “Entrenched Board and Management”).

As noted previously, despite numerous requests made by Dr. Smith which were denied, Dr. Smith was compelled to file a petition with the Supreme Court of British Columbia (the “Court”) seeking 11 different orders. The Company ultimately consented to five orders, including an order that the record date for the AGM has been frozen at May 28, 2021. Hence, the shareholders, and shareholdings, authorized to vote at the meeting will not change. On September 3, 2021, the Court refused to grant an order for an independent chair at the AGM or to order that the AGM occur earlier than November 12, 2021 which was the date the Company submitted to the Court that it intended to hold the AGM. The court also refused to require that votes cast with QuickVote (which was used despite it being considered under general industry practice to be inappropriate for use in a disputed election) be recast noting that they comprise less than 1% of eligible votes. Additionally, the Court noted that the TSX Venture Exchange (the “Exchange”) has required that Fancamp hold its AGM at least two clear business days before closing the transaction with ScoZinc Mining Ltd. (“ScoZinc”, the “ScoZinc Arrangement”) and Dr. Smith can re-apply for further orders after the AGM if necessary. In effect the Court has maintained the status quo with respect to the AGM.

Shareholders are reminded that the Entrenched Board and Management have consistently refused to hold the AGM in a timely manner. A full 22 months has passed since the last annual general meeting and Fancamp stubbornly remains not in compliance with section 4 of Exchange Policy 3.2. with respect to the timing of annual general meetings. The AGM, as scheduled on June 29, 2021, was postponed indefinitely under an extension granted on May 27, 2021 by the BC Registrar of Companies under the pretext of issues related to the COVID-19 pandemic, prior to the filing of Dr. Smith’s petition to the court. In Fancamp’s September 7, 2021 press release it falsely states that the postponement was made necessary by Dr. Smith’s petition. In any event, the Court has settled this petition, so it is no longer an excuse to delay the AGM.

Aside from the issue of the long overdue AGM, shareholders are encouraged to review the annual Audited Annual Financial Statements and Management Discussion and Analysis (the “Annual Financial Statements”) filed August 30, 2021 on SEDAR for the fiscal year 2021. It has been a full year since Dr. Smith was forced to resign his position as CEO in favour of Rajesh Sharma in that role. The Annual Financial Statements provide information for the 12-month period ending April 30, 2021 and so it does not cover the full period of Mr. Sharma’s tenure as CEO. However, it does show that Mr. Sharma has failed to build any new value for shareholders. The share price has remained stagnant even though Fancamp recorded net income of $0.11 per share basic for the period. This extraordinary increase in net income is related mainly to unrealized gains on marketable securities ($15,007,544) and realized gains on the disposal of marketable securities ($6,833,369). These gains are almost entirely attributable to securities of Champion Iron Mines Ltd. (“Champion”) that were acquired directly due to actions undertaken by Dr. Smith on Fancamp’s behalf years before Mr. Sharma became involved with the Company.

Management and consulting fees have exploded to $564,084 for 2021 from $93,375 in the same period for 2020. For his part, the Annual Financial Statements show that Mr. Sharma has collected fees of $139,000 over a seven and half month period for approximately $18,500 per month. No details of his management contract are revealed in the Annual Financial Statements. Legal Fees are $739,836 for 2021 compared to $249,525 for 2020 due mainly to multiple frivolous civil suits launched by Fancamp against Dr. Smith. On the exploration side, no meaningful drilling, survey or assay results have been reported during Mr. Sharma’s tenure as CEO. Total exploration costs for fiscal 2021 amounted to only $430,492 with $193,470 (45%) of that described vaguely as “Engineering, Consulting and Sundry”. It is shocking that exploration costs for the 12-month period amounted to a mere 17% of total expenditures compared to 83% ($2,138,260) spent on general and administrative expenses.

The subsequent notes also cast doubt on the ability of the Entrenched Board and Management to fulfill their fiduciary duty to do what is best for the Company. The ScoZinc Arrangement continues to drain Fancamp with a secured loan agreement of $250,000 to ScoZinc executed on May 19, 2021, and outright cash payments to ScoZinc of $125,000 per month subsequently to obtain one month extensions for July and August. This is excessive considering that there is no guarantee that the ScoZinc Arrangement will close.

On May 12, 2021, KPMG International Ltd. was retained to launch a formal forensic investigation into the alleged misconduct of Dr. Smith and on May 14, 2021 Fancamp filed a civil claim in the British Columbia Supreme Court against Dr. Smith. Dr. Smith has produced documentation in accordance with the rules of court. Despite demand and in breach of the rules, the Company has yet to produce any documents to Dr. Smith in the BC action. Notably, it has also refused, despite requests, to provide particulars of the alleged self-dealing allegations made in the BC action. In the BC petition proceedings, KPMG advised that they had received over 100,000 documents and the only opinions they have been able to provide are that the Magpie transaction which is a basis for action occurred in 2007, has been disclosed since the 2008 audited financial statements and there is a discrepancy in the records as to whether shares were issued to Dr. Smith in consideration for past services or for agreeing to be a director. Moreover, despite that over 100,000 documents have been provided to KPMG, the Company proceeded with a duplicative proceeding the Quebec Superior Court to obtain technical and financial information belonging to the Company allegedly withheld by Dr. Smith. On August 6, 2021, the safeguard order was dismissed on the basis that there was no urgent need for any documents. Notably, the Company and its auditors were able to sign the audited financial statements without qualification based on the documents in their possession. Further, the Company completed its technical review with the documents in its possession. The only basis to continue to pursue Dr. Smith at the expense of the Company’s shareholders in these circumstances is to attempt to discredit him and bankrupt him in an effort to win the proxy fight.

On May 27, 2021, the day prior to the record date, the Entrenched Board and Management exercised recently issued incentive stock options for the purchase of a total of 10,200,000 common shares. Prior to this exercise they collectively held only 1.9% of the issued and outstanding shares of the Company.

On July 13, 2021, the Company announced that it had received a paltry $1.3 million in exchange for its 1.5% royalty interests in the O’Keefe-Purdy, Harvey-Tuttle, Bellechasse, Oil Can, Fire Lake North Consolidated, Peppler Lake and Moiré Lake iron-ore properties in the Fermont area of Quebec, and for its 100%-owned Lac Lamêlée iron-ore property in the same area under an agreement executed with Champion (the “Agreement”). The Annual Financial Statements state that under the Agreement “… certain future finite production payments [will be] payable once certain iron ore production thresholds have been reached…” Since royalty payments are by definition based on production, it appears Fancamp gave away rights to production payments that it already owned.

The Annual Financial Statements do not reflect disclosure contained in SEDI filings, that Ashwath Mehra a director of Fancamp and of Scozinc, purchased 22,000,000 shares of Fancamp from Champion on July 15, 2021 through ASTOR Management AG, a company that he controls. This transaction was done only two days after the Royalty Agreement between Fancamp and Champion closed. On July 19, 2021 Mehra, again through ASTOR Management AG, acquired an additional 6,668,000 to bring his beneficial ownership and control to 31,418,000 shares, representing 17.8% of the outstanding issued and outstanding share capital.

The interim first quarter financial statements for the three months ending July 31 are due to be filed by Fancamp by the end of September. These statements will likely reveal more misguided spending on administrative, directors fees and legal fees, no efforts to build value for shareholders and continued unwillingness to apply fiduciary duties to the Company above the self-interests of the Entrenched Board and Management. The easiest, quickest, most ethical and legal way to prevent this continued, massive hemorrhage of Company funds is to hold the long-overdue AGM. Fancamp cannot move forward until the festering issue of accountability of the board to shareholders is settled.

Shareholders are urged to stop the Entrenched Board and Management from further entrenchment and destruction of shareholder value by continuing to vote the GREEN form of proxy and to resist inducements to change their votes. The Concerned Shareholders would like to thank the true owners of Fancamp for their tremendous support and patience to date. This support comes from independent shareholders that are completely frustrated and totally disgusted by the unethical, corrupt and frantic entrenchment tactics employed for personal benefit over the interests of the Company.

Advisors

Farris LLP are acting as legal advisors to Dr. Peter Smith and Gryphon Advisors Inc., are acting as their strategic shareholder communications and proxy advisor. Gryphon’s responsibility will include providing strategic advice and advising the Concerned Shareholders with respect to the annual general meeting and proxy protocol.

The registered address of Fancamp is located at 3200 – 650 West Georgia Street, Vancouver, BC, V6B 4P7. The mailing and head office address of Fancamp is 7290 Gray Avenue, Burnaby, British Columbia V5J 3Z2. A copy of this press release may be obtained on Fancamp’s SEDAR profile at www.sedar.com.

For more information regarding the Concerned Shareholders’ position please contact:
Gryphon Advisors Inc.
Tel: 1-833-461-3651
Email: [email protected]

To view the source version of this press release, please visit https://www.newsfilecorp.com/release/95881

Powered by WPeMatico

Fintech

How to identify authenticity in crypto influencer channels

Published

on

 

Modern brands stake on influencer marketing, with 76% of users making a purchase after seeing a product on social media.The cryptocurrency industry is no exception to this trend. However, promoting crypto products through influencer marketing can be particularly challenging. Crypto influencers pose a significant risk to a brand’s reputation and ROI due to rampant scams. Approximately 80% of channels provide fake statistics, including followers counts and engagement metrics. Additionally, this niche is characterized by high CPMs, which can increase the risk of financial loss for brands.

In this article Nadia Bubennnikova, Head of agency Famesters, will explore the most important things to look for in crypto channels to find the perfect match for influencer marketing collaborations.

 

  1. Comments 

There are several levels related to this point.

 

LEVEL 1

Analyze approximately 10 of the channel’s latest videos, looking through the comments to ensure they are not purchased from dubious sources. For example, such comments as “Yes sir, great video!”; “Thanks!”; “Love you man!”; “Quality content”, and others most certainly are bot-generated and should be avoided.

Just to compare: 

LEVEL 2

Don’t rush to conclude that you’ve discovered the perfect crypto channel just because you’ve come across some logical comments that align with the video’s topic. This may seem controversial, but it’s important to dive deeper. When you encounter a channel with logical comments, ensure that they are unique and not duplicated under the description box. Some creators are smarter than just buying comments from the first link that Google shows you when you search “buy YouTube comments”. They generate topics, provide multiple examples, or upload lists of examples, all produced by AI. You can either manually review the comments or use a script to parse all the YouTube comments into an Excel file. Then, add a formula to highlight any duplicates.

LEVEL 3

It is also a must to check the names of the profiles that leave the comments: most of the bot-generated comments are easy to track: they will all have the usernames made of random symbols and numbers, random first and last name combinations, “Habibi”, etc. No profile pictures on all comments is also a red flag.

 

LEVEL 4

Another important factor to consider when assessing comment authenticity is the posting date. If all the comments were posted on the same day, it’s likely that the traffic was purchased.

 

2. Average views number per video

This is indeed one of the key metrics to consider when selecting an influencer for collaboration, regardless of the product type. What specific factors should we focus on?

First & foremost: the views dynamics on the channel. The most desirable type of YouTube channel in terms of views is one that maintains stable viewership across all of its videos. This stability serves as proof of an active and loyal audience genuinely interested in the creator’s content, unlike channels where views vary significantly from one video to another.

Many unauthentic crypto channels not only buy YouTube comments but also invest in increasing video views to create the impression of stability. So, what exactly should we look at in terms of views? Firstly, calculate the average number of views based on the ten latest videos. Then, compare this figure to the views of the most recent videos posted within the past week. If you notice that these new videos have nearly the same number of views as those posted a month or two ago, it’s a clear red flag. Typically, a YouTube channel experiences lower views on new videos, with the number increasing organically each day as the audience engages with the content. If you see a video posted just three days ago already garnering 30k views, matching the total views of older videos, it’s a sign of fraudulent traffic purchased to create the illusion of view stability.

 

3. Influencer’s channel statistics

The primary statistics of interest are region and demographic split, and sometimes the device types of the viewers.

LEVEL 1

When reviewing the shared statistics, the first step is to request a video screencast instead of a simple screenshot. This is because it takes more time to organically edit a video than a screenshot, making it harder to manipulate the statistics. If the creator refuses, step two (if only screenshots are provided) is to download them and check the file’s properties on your computer. Look for details such as whether it was created with Adobe Photoshop or the color profile, typically Adobe RGB, to determine if the screenshot has been edited.

LEVEL 2

After confirming the authenticity of the stats screenshot, it’s crucial to analyze the data. For instance, if you’re examining a channel conducted in Spanish with all videos filmed in the same language, it would raise concerns to find a significant audience from countries like India or Turkey. This discrepancy, where the audience doesn’t align with regions known for speaking the language, is a red flag.

If we’re considering an English-language crypto channel, it typically suggests an international audience, as English’s global use for quality educational content on niche topics like crypto. However, certain considerations apply. For instance, if an English-speaking channel shows a significant percentage of Polish viewers (15% to 30%) without any mention of the Polish language, it could indicate fake followers and views. However, if the channel’s creator is Polish, occasionally posts videos in Polish alongside English, and receives Polish comments, it’s important not to rush to conclusions.

Example of statistics

 

Wrapping up

These are the main factors to consider when selecting an influencer to promote your crypto product. Once you’ve launched the campaign, there are also some markers to show which creators did bring the authentic traffic and which used some tools to create the illusion of an active and engaged audience. While this may seem obvious, it’s still worth mentioning. After the video is posted, allow 5-7 days for it to accumulate a basic number of views, then check performance metrics such as views, clicks, click-through rate (CTR), signups, and conversion rate (CR) from clicks to signups.

If you overlooked some red flags when selecting crypto channels for your launch, you might find the following outcomes: channels with high views numbers and high CTRs, demonstrating the real interest of the audience, yet with remarkably low conversion rates. In the worst-case scenario, you might witness thousands of clicks resulting in zero to just a few signups. While this might suggest technical issues in other industries, in crypto campaigns it indicates that the creator engaged in the campaign not only bought fake views and comments but also link clicks. And this happens more often than you may realize.

Summing up, choosing the right crypto creator to promote your product is indeed a tricky job that requires a lot of resources to be put into the search process. 

Author Nadia Bubennikova, Head of agency  at Famesters

Author

Nadia Bubennikova, Head of agency at Famesters

Continue Reading

Fintech

Central banks and the FinTech sector unite to change global payments space

Published

on

central-banks-and-the-fintech-sector-unite-to-change-global-payments-space

 

The BIS, along with seven leading central banks and a cohort of private financial firms, has embarked on an ambitious venture known as Project Agorá.

Named after the Greek word for “marketplace,” this initiative stands at the forefront of exploring the potential of tokenisation to significantly enhance the operational efficiency of the monetary system worldwide.

Central to this pioneering project are the Bank of France (on behalf of the Eurosystem), the Bank of Japan, the Bank of Korea, the Bank of Mexico, the Swiss National Bank, the Bank of England, and the Federal Reserve Bank of New York. These institutions have joined forces under the banner of Project Agorá, in partnership with an extensive assembly of private financial entities convened by the Institute of International Finance (IIF).

At the heart of Project Agorá is the pursuit of integrating tokenised commercial bank deposits with tokenised wholesale central bank money within a unified, public-private programmable financial platform. By harnessing the advanced capabilities of smart contracts and programmability, the project aspires to unlock new transactional possibilities that were previously infeasible or impractical, thereby fostering novel opportunities that could benefit businesses and consumers alike.

The collaborative effort seeks to address and surmount a variety of structural inefficiencies that currently plague cross-border payments. These challenges include disparate legal, regulatory, and technical standards; varying operating hours and time zones; and the heightened complexity associated with conducting financial integrity checks (such as anti-money laundering and customer verification procedures), which are often redundantly executed across multiple stages of a single transaction due to the involvement of several intermediaries.

As a beacon of experimental and exploratory projects, the BIS Innovation Hub is committed to delivering public goods to the global central banking community through initiatives like Project Agorá. In line with this mission, the BIS will soon issue a call for expressions of interest from private financial institutions eager to contribute to this ground-breaking project. The IIF will facilitate the involvement of private sector participants, extending an invitation to regulated financial institutions representing each of the seven aforementioned currencies to partake in this transformative endeavour.

Source: fintech.globa

The post Central banks and the FinTech sector unite to change global payments space appeared first on HIPTHER Alerts.

Continue Reading

Fintech

TD Bank inks multi-year strategic partnership with Google Cloud

Published

on

td-bank-inks-multi-year-strategic-partnership-with-google-cloud

 

TD Bank has inked a multi-year deal with Google Cloud as it looks to streamline the development and deployment of new products and services.

The deal will see the Canadian banking group integrate the vendor’s cloud services into a wider portion of its technology solutions portfolio, a move which TD expects will enable it “to respond quickly to changing customer expectations by rolling out new features, updates, or entirely new financial products at an accelerated pace”.

This marks an expansion of the already established relationship between TD Bank and Google Cloud after the group previously adopted the vendor’s Google Kubernetes Engine (GKE) for TD Securities Automated Trading (TDSAT), the Chicago-based subsidiary of its investment banking unit, TD Securities.

TDSAT uses GKE for process automation and quantitative modelling across fixed income markets, resulting in the development of a “data-driven research platform” capable of processing large research workloads in trading.

Dan Bosman, SVP and CIO of TD Securities, claims the infrastructure has so far supported TDSAT with “compute-intensive quantitative analysis” while expanding the subsidiary’s “trading volumes and portfolio size”.

TD’s new partnership with Google Cloud will see the group attempt to replicate the same level of success across its entire portfolio.

Source: fintechfutures.com

The post TD Bank inks multi-year strategic partnership with Google Cloud appeared first on HIPTHER Alerts.

Continue Reading

Trending