Connect with us
MARE BALTICUM Gaming & TECH Summit 2024

Fintech

SEC Announces Enforcement Results for FY 2021

Published

on

Washington, D.C.–(Newsfile Corp. – November 18, 2021) – The Securities and Exchange Commission today announced that it filed 434 new enforcement actions in fiscal year 2021, representing a 7 percent increase over the prior year. Seventy percent of these new or “stand-alone” actions involved at least one individual defendant or respondent. The new actions spanned the entire securities waterfront, including against emerging threats in the crypto and SPAC spaces. For example, the SEC charged a company for operating an unregistered online digital asset exchange, charged a crypto lending platform and top executives alleging a $2 billion fraud, and brought an action against a special purpose acquisition company, its merger target, top executives, and others for alleged misconduct in a SPAC transaction. The SEC’s whistleblower program was critical to these efforts and had a record-breaking year.

The agency filed 697 total enforcement actions in fiscal year 2021, including the 434 new actions, 120 actions against issuers who were delinquent in making required filings with the SEC, and 143 “follow-on” administrative proceedings seeking bars against individuals based on criminal convictions, civil injunctions, or other orders. This represented a 3 percent decrease over the total actions filed in fiscal year 2020.

“The SEC’s Enforcement Division is the cop on the beat for America’s securities laws,” said Chair Gary Gensler. “As these results show, we go after misconduct wherever we find it in the financial system, holding individuals and companies accountable, without fear or favor, across the $100-plus trillion capital markets we oversee.”

“This year has seen a number of critically important and first-of-their-kind enforcement actions, as well as record-breaking achievements for our whistleblower program, which we expect will lead to even more successful actions in the future,” said Gurbir S. Grewal, Director of the SEC’s Division of Enforcement. “Undeterred by the challenges of the pandemic, the dedicated public servants in the Enforcement Division have continued to overcome obstacles to bring these cases that protect investors and promote market integrity.”

In fiscal year 2021, which ended on Sept. 30, the SEC also obtained judgments and orders for nearly $2.4 billion in disgorgement and more than $1.4 billion in penalties, which represented a respective 33 percent decrease and 33 percent increase over amounts ordered in the prior fiscal year in these categories.

Fiscal year 2021 also was a record year for whistleblower awards, with the SEC awarding a total of $564 million to 108 whistleblowers. The whistleblower program also surpassed $1 billion in awards over the life of the program.

Overview of SEC Enforcement in Fiscal Year 2021

In fiscal year 2021, the SEC filed noteworthy enforcement actions across new areas, including a number of first-of-their-kind actions:

In addition, the SEC filed impactful enforcement actions that spanned the securities markets, including the following matters:

Other examples of enforcement actions in key priority areas include:

Holding Individuals Accountable

Ensuring Gatekeepers Live Up to Their Obligations

  • Suspended two former KPMG auditors for alleged improper professional conduct during the audit of the not-for-profit College of New Rochelle.
  • Charged a CPA with failing to register his firm with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB) and failures in auditing and reviewing the financial statements of a public company client.
  • Charged an audit firm partner for allegedly engaging in improper professional conduct during audits of a public company client.
  • Charged two attorneys – one of whom was previously disbarred – for their roles in an alleged scheme to fraudulently facilitate the sale of millions of shares of microcap securities to retail investors.
  • Barred a securities lawyer from practicing or appearing before the SEC.

Rooting Out Misconduct in Crypto

  • Charged entities and individuals with unregistered and/or fraudulent offerings of digital asset securities, including: fraud and unregistered offering charges against three individuals who founded and promoted digital asset companies; charges against an issuer and its founders for allegedly defrauding more than a thousand investors in an unregistered offering of digital asset securities; and charges against Ripple Labs and two of its executives alleging a $1.3 billion unregistered offering.
  • Took action against other misconduct in the crypto market, including charging the operator of ICO listing website Coinschedule.com with unlawfully touting digital asset securities.

Policing Financial Fraud and Issuer Disclosure

Charging Improper Conduct by Investment Professionals

  • Brought an action against UK-based investment adviser BlueCrest Capital Management for inadequate disclosures and other misstatements and omissions concerning its transfer of top traders to another fund, which will result in $170 million being returned to harmed investors.
  • Charged investment advisers and their portfolio managers with misleading investors and others about their risk management practices over funds that lost more than $1 billion in two trading days.
  • Charged a fund manager with fraudulently raising and misappropriating tens of millions of dollars in a private fund.
  • Charged an unregistered investment adviser for allegedly defrauding a Puerto Rican municipality and misappropriating more than $7 million of taxpayer funds.
  • Charged a rogue trader with causing millions of dollars of losses through unauthorized trading and bankrupting his broker-dealer firm.
  • Charged a robo-adviser with breaching its fiduciary duties in connection with its investment of client assets into exchange-traded funds sponsored by its parent company.
  • Charged an investment adviser for breaching its fiduciary duties in connection with its receipt of revenue sharing payments.

Protecting Market Integrity

  • Charged S&P Dow Jones Indices for failures relating to a quality control feature of one of its volatility-related indices, which led S&P to publish and distribute stale index values during a period of unprecedented volatility.
  • Charged former credit ratings agency Morningstar Credit Ratings with alleged disclosure and internal control violations in rating commercial mortgage-backed securities.
  • Brought charges against UBS and other investment advisers and broker-dealers as part of the Division of Enforcement’s Exchange-Traded Products Initiative, which utilizes trading data analytics to uncover potential violations of the securities laws.
  • Charged a company, its principal, and its trader with causing broker-dealers to violate Reg SHO by mismarking trades and related issues.
  • Charged a global securities pricing service with compliance deficiencies related to so-called single broker quotes.
  • Charged a broker-dealer for failures related to filing Suspicious Activity Reports.

Cracking Down on Insider Trading and Market Manipulation

  • Brought insider trading charges against numerous individuals, including:
  • Charged two individuals for alleged wash trading in the options of certain “meme stocks” in early 2021.
  • Charged a quantitative analyst and a hedge fund trader for allegedly perpetrating front-running schemes, which were uncovered by the SEC’s data analytics tools.
  • Charged numerous individuals, including the chairman of a public company, for their roles in alleged long-running fraudulent schemes that generated hundreds of millions of dollars from unlawful stock sales and harmed retail investors in the U.S. and around the world.

Enforcing the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act

  • Charged Goldman Sachs in connection with the 1Malaysia Development Berhad (1MDB) bribery scheme, resulting in the company paying more than $1 billion to settle the SEC’s charges.
  • Charged Deutsche Bank for internal control failures relating to its payments to third-party intermediaries that resulted in approximately $7 million in bribe payments or payments for unknown services.
  • Charged WPP, the world’s largest advertising group, with violating the anti-bribery, books and records, and internal accounting controls provisions of the FCPA, resulting in a more than $19 million settlement.
  • Charged Brazilian meat producers with an extensive, multi-year bribery scheme, resulting in a nearly $27 million settlement to resolve the SEC’s charges.

Guarding Against Public Finance Abuse

Pursing Wrongdoing in Securities Offerings

  • Charged an Israeli company and its former top executives with deceiving U.S. investors out of more than $100 million through fraudulent and unregistered sales of risky “binary option” securities.
  • Charged two former executives of a subprime automobile finance company with misleading investors about the loans that backed their $100 million offering.
  • Charged a company and two managing members with participating in a fraudulent, unregistered offering of securities in a purported “green” mining venture.
  • Charged a top executive at two companies for allegedly defrauding investors by “scalping” (secretly selling stock while paying promoters to recommend retail investors buy the stock), misappropriating funds, and falsely promoting apps that he claimed would facilitate cryptocurrency transactions and help combat the coronavirus.
  • Charged the co-founders of a San Francisco-based medical testing company for allegedly defrauding investors out of $60 million by falsely portraying the company as a successful start-up with a proven business model and strong prospects for future growth, and the former CEO of another Silicon Valley technology company for allegedly defrauding investors out of $80 million by falsely claiming strong and consistent growth.
  • Brought actions against wrongdoers targeting affinity groups, including:
    • Charging a jewelry wholesaler with raising more than $69 million and operating a fraudulent Ponzi-like scheme targeting current and retired police officers and firefighters;
    • Charging a company and its CEO for an alleged $119 million securities fraud targeting members of the South Asian American community;
    • Charging a New Jersey resident with defrauding investors, most of whom were members of the Orthodox Jewish community; and
    • Charging a Florida payday loan company and its CEO with fraudulently raising at least $66 million from retain investors including members of the Venezuelan-American community.

Swiftly Acting to Protect Investors

Achieving Success in Litigation

  • Investment adviser World Tree Financial and co-owners Wesley Kyle Perkins and Priscilla Perkins were found liable for a fraudulent cherry-picking scheme and related misrepresentations.
  • Investment adviser Richard Duncan was found liable for violating the anti-fraud provisions of the Investment Advisers Act for soliciting his clients’ investments in an advance-fee scam.
  • Final judgments were entered against investment adviser Westport Capital Markets and its owner, Chris McClure, ordering disgorgement and related interest of more than $820,000, and civil penalties of $500,000 against Westport and $200,000 against McClure. The final judgments follow a March 2020 jury verdict, as well as a prior grant of partial summary judgment, both in the SEC’s favor.

Rewarding and Protecting Whistleblowers

  • Gave the highest awards in the program’s history, including a $114 million award to a whistleblower whose information and assistance led to the successful enforcement of an SEC action and related actions by another agency; and a $110 million award to another whistleblower who provided significant independent analysis that substantially advanced both the SEC’s investigation and another agency’s related investigation.
  • Charged a broker-dealer with violating a whistleblower protection rule that prohibits taking any action to impede an individual from communicating directly with the SEC about a possible securities law violation.
  • Charged a registered investment adviser with allegedly violating whistleblower protection laws by including language in termination and separation agreements that impeded individuals from coming forward to the SEC and by retaliating against a known whistleblower, along with charging that entity and others with running a Ponzi-like scheme that raised more than $1.7 billion from more than 17,000 retail investors.

Fintech

How to identify authenticity in crypto influencer channels

Published

on

 

Modern brands stake on influencer marketing, with 76% of users making a purchase after seeing a product on social media.The cryptocurrency industry is no exception to this trend. However, promoting crypto products through influencer marketing can be particularly challenging. Crypto influencers pose a significant risk to a brand’s reputation and ROI due to rampant scams. Approximately 80% of channels provide fake statistics, including followers counts and engagement metrics. Additionally, this niche is characterized by high CPMs, which can increase the risk of financial loss for brands.

In this article Nadia Bubennnikova, Head of agency Famesters, will explore the most important things to look for in crypto channels to find the perfect match for influencer marketing collaborations.

 

  1. Comments 

There are several levels related to this point.

 

LEVEL 1

Analyze approximately 10 of the channel’s latest videos, looking through the comments to ensure they are not purchased from dubious sources. For example, such comments as “Yes sir, great video!”; “Thanks!”; “Love you man!”; “Quality content”, and others most certainly are bot-generated and should be avoided.

Just to compare: 

LEVEL 2

Don’t rush to conclude that you’ve discovered the perfect crypto channel just because you’ve come across some logical comments that align with the video’s topic. This may seem controversial, but it’s important to dive deeper. When you encounter a channel with logical comments, ensure that they are unique and not duplicated under the description box. Some creators are smarter than just buying comments from the first link that Google shows you when you search “buy YouTube comments”. They generate topics, provide multiple examples, or upload lists of examples, all produced by AI. You can either manually review the comments or use a script to parse all the YouTube comments into an Excel file. Then, add a formula to highlight any duplicates.

LEVEL 3

It is also a must to check the names of the profiles that leave the comments: most of the bot-generated comments are easy to track: they will all have the usernames made of random symbols and numbers, random first and last name combinations, “Habibi”, etc. No profile pictures on all comments is also a red flag.

 

LEVEL 4

Another important factor to consider when assessing comment authenticity is the posting date. If all the comments were posted on the same day, it’s likely that the traffic was purchased.

 

2. Average views number per video

This is indeed one of the key metrics to consider when selecting an influencer for collaboration, regardless of the product type. What specific factors should we focus on?

First & foremost: the views dynamics on the channel. The most desirable type of YouTube channel in terms of views is one that maintains stable viewership across all of its videos. This stability serves as proof of an active and loyal audience genuinely interested in the creator’s content, unlike channels where views vary significantly from one video to another.

Many unauthentic crypto channels not only buy YouTube comments but also invest in increasing video views to create the impression of stability. So, what exactly should we look at in terms of views? Firstly, calculate the average number of views based on the ten latest videos. Then, compare this figure to the views of the most recent videos posted within the past week. If you notice that these new videos have nearly the same number of views as those posted a month or two ago, it’s a clear red flag. Typically, a YouTube channel experiences lower views on new videos, with the number increasing organically each day as the audience engages with the content. If you see a video posted just three days ago already garnering 30k views, matching the total views of older videos, it’s a sign of fraudulent traffic purchased to create the illusion of view stability.

 

3. Influencer’s channel statistics

The primary statistics of interest are region and demographic split, and sometimes the device types of the viewers.

LEVEL 1

When reviewing the shared statistics, the first step is to request a video screencast instead of a simple screenshot. This is because it takes more time to organically edit a video than a screenshot, making it harder to manipulate the statistics. If the creator refuses, step two (if only screenshots are provided) is to download them and check the file’s properties on your computer. Look for details such as whether it was created with Adobe Photoshop or the color profile, typically Adobe RGB, to determine if the screenshot has been edited.

LEVEL 2

After confirming the authenticity of the stats screenshot, it’s crucial to analyze the data. For instance, if you’re examining a channel conducted in Spanish with all videos filmed in the same language, it would raise concerns to find a significant audience from countries like India or Turkey. This discrepancy, where the audience doesn’t align with regions known for speaking the language, is a red flag.

If we’re considering an English-language crypto channel, it typically suggests an international audience, as English’s global use for quality educational content on niche topics like crypto. However, certain considerations apply. For instance, if an English-speaking channel shows a significant percentage of Polish viewers (15% to 30%) without any mention of the Polish language, it could indicate fake followers and views. However, if the channel’s creator is Polish, occasionally posts videos in Polish alongside English, and receives Polish comments, it’s important not to rush to conclusions.

Example of statistics

 

Wrapping up

These are the main factors to consider when selecting an influencer to promote your crypto product. Once you’ve launched the campaign, there are also some markers to show which creators did bring the authentic traffic and which used some tools to create the illusion of an active and engaged audience. While this may seem obvious, it’s still worth mentioning. After the video is posted, allow 5-7 days for it to accumulate a basic number of views, then check performance metrics such as views, clicks, click-through rate (CTR), signups, and conversion rate (CR) from clicks to signups.

If you overlooked some red flags when selecting crypto channels for your launch, you might find the following outcomes: channels with high views numbers and high CTRs, demonstrating the real interest of the audience, yet with remarkably low conversion rates. In the worst-case scenario, you might witness thousands of clicks resulting in zero to just a few signups. While this might suggest technical issues in other industries, in crypto campaigns it indicates that the creator engaged in the campaign not only bought fake views and comments but also link clicks. And this happens more often than you may realize.

Summing up, choosing the right crypto creator to promote your product is indeed a tricky job that requires a lot of resources to be put into the search process. 

Author Nadia Bubennikova, Head of agency  at Famesters

Author

Nadia Bubennikova, Head of agency at Famesters

Continue Reading

Fintech

Central banks and the FinTech sector unite to change global payments space

Published

on

central-banks-and-the-fintech-sector-unite-to-change-global-payments-space

 

The BIS, along with seven leading central banks and a cohort of private financial firms, has embarked on an ambitious venture known as Project Agorá.

Named after the Greek word for “marketplace,” this initiative stands at the forefront of exploring the potential of tokenisation to significantly enhance the operational efficiency of the monetary system worldwide.

Central to this pioneering project are the Bank of France (on behalf of the Eurosystem), the Bank of Japan, the Bank of Korea, the Bank of Mexico, the Swiss National Bank, the Bank of England, and the Federal Reserve Bank of New York. These institutions have joined forces under the banner of Project Agorá, in partnership with an extensive assembly of private financial entities convened by the Institute of International Finance (IIF).

At the heart of Project Agorá is the pursuit of integrating tokenised commercial bank deposits with tokenised wholesale central bank money within a unified, public-private programmable financial platform. By harnessing the advanced capabilities of smart contracts and programmability, the project aspires to unlock new transactional possibilities that were previously infeasible or impractical, thereby fostering novel opportunities that could benefit businesses and consumers alike.

The collaborative effort seeks to address and surmount a variety of structural inefficiencies that currently plague cross-border payments. These challenges include disparate legal, regulatory, and technical standards; varying operating hours and time zones; and the heightened complexity associated with conducting financial integrity checks (such as anti-money laundering and customer verification procedures), which are often redundantly executed across multiple stages of a single transaction due to the involvement of several intermediaries.

As a beacon of experimental and exploratory projects, the BIS Innovation Hub is committed to delivering public goods to the global central banking community through initiatives like Project Agorá. In line with this mission, the BIS will soon issue a call for expressions of interest from private financial institutions eager to contribute to this ground-breaking project. The IIF will facilitate the involvement of private sector participants, extending an invitation to regulated financial institutions representing each of the seven aforementioned currencies to partake in this transformative endeavour.

Source: fintech.globa

The post Central banks and the FinTech sector unite to change global payments space appeared first on HIPTHER Alerts.

Continue Reading

Fintech

TD Bank inks multi-year strategic partnership with Google Cloud

Published

on

td-bank-inks-multi-year-strategic-partnership-with-google-cloud

 

TD Bank has inked a multi-year deal with Google Cloud as it looks to streamline the development and deployment of new products and services.

The deal will see the Canadian banking group integrate the vendor’s cloud services into a wider portion of its technology solutions portfolio, a move which TD expects will enable it “to respond quickly to changing customer expectations by rolling out new features, updates, or entirely new financial products at an accelerated pace”.

This marks an expansion of the already established relationship between TD Bank and Google Cloud after the group previously adopted the vendor’s Google Kubernetes Engine (GKE) for TD Securities Automated Trading (TDSAT), the Chicago-based subsidiary of its investment banking unit, TD Securities.

TDSAT uses GKE for process automation and quantitative modelling across fixed income markets, resulting in the development of a “data-driven research platform” capable of processing large research workloads in trading.

Dan Bosman, SVP and CIO of TD Securities, claims the infrastructure has so far supported TDSAT with “compute-intensive quantitative analysis” while expanding the subsidiary’s “trading volumes and portfolio size”.

TD’s new partnership with Google Cloud will see the group attempt to replicate the same level of success across its entire portfolio.

Source: fintechfutures.com

The post TD Bank inks multi-year strategic partnership with Google Cloud appeared first on HIPTHER Alerts.

Continue Reading

Trending