Connect with us
MARE BALTICUM Gaming & TECH Summit 2024

Fintech

E-Tech Resources Inc. Reports Diamond Drill Intercepts of REE Bearing Dykes Beyond the Current Resource at Its Eureka Project in Namibia

Published

on

Reading Time: 5 minutes

Halifax, Nova Scotia–(Newsfile Corp. – February 10, 2022) – E-Tech Resources Inc. (TSXV: REE) (FSE: K2i) (“E-Tech” or the “Company”) is pleased to announce additional assay results from the first diamond drilling campaign completed at the Eureka REE Project (“Eureka” or the “Project”), located in central Namibia. Significant intersections include 9.4m @ 1.3% Total Rare Earth Oxide (“TREO”) (ED008), 4.8m @ 1.2% TREO (ED009), 1m @ 13.4% TREO (ED017), 3.5m @ 4% TREO (ED011), 4.2m @1.2% TREO (ED017) and 1.9m @ 1.8% TREO (ED019). The results from these eight holes, all of which have intersected mineralisation, have confirmed the presence of mineralisation in Zones 1 and 2 at depth and its southward extension along strike. The deposit remains open both along strike and at depth. The Corporation is awaiting receipt of additional results from the 5 remaining holes of this first diamond drilling campaign completed in September 2021. Previous diamond drilling results were reported in the press release dated 10 November 2021.

Elbert Loois, CEO of E-Tech Resources Inc., commented:

“The assay results received to date reveal further extension of the mineralization both to depth and along strike. Further monazite bearing carbonatitic dykes have been intersected, which suggests connectivity of Zones 1 and 2. We are excited about the perspective of further expanding the extent of the known mineralisation during our ongoing second campaign of diamond drilling. After receipt of the remaining drill hole assays our next step will include the development of a resource block model as a basis for updating the current Mineral Resource Estimate.”

The newly received assay results are part of the resource expansion program across Zones 1, 2 and 3, which was completed in late September 2021 totaling 5,761 meters of diamond drilling (DD) in 20 holes. Figure 1 indicates the drill collar positions and the assays received to date. These assay results include the newly received batch of 541 samples out of a total of 1288 samples, representing holes ED008, ED009, ED010, ED011, ED012, ED016, ED017 and ED019.

The positions of the DD and RC holes from the previous drilling as well as the ongoing campaign is displayed in Figure 1. In this figure, the white lined box indicates the area of projected holes used for expanded cross-section (A-B), as shown in detail in Figures 2 and 3.

FIGURE 2: The white lined box shows the zoomed-in area of holes used for projection into cross-section (A-B), as presented in Figure 3. The purple outline represents the current 2021 Mineral Resource Estimate (MRE). Blue diamonds are DD assays received. Red lines represent DD hole traces related to new assay results. Hollow white dots and diamonds are assays pending. Red dots are RC holes drilled in 2017.

To view an enhanced version of Figure 2, please visit:

FIGURE 3: Schematic cross-section through Zone 1, including the projection of all relevant DD and RC assay results. The new assay results of drill hole ED009 are marked in yellow. EU001, EU003 and EU004 are the historical RC holes used for MRE definition, as drilled in 2017.

To view an enhanced version of Figure 3, please visit:
https://orders.newsfilecorp.com/files/6102/113314_figure3.jpg

A summary of the assay results received from the eight (8) diamond drill holes is provided in Table 1.

TABLE 1: Significant intercepts from the new analytical results of the 2021 diamond drilling (DD) campaign. Reported intercepts are drilled lengths while the true thickness of the mineralization is estimated to range between 60 and 80 per cent of the drilled lengths. Further drilling is necessary to establish the true thickness of the dykes.

Hole From To Interval m TREO % Coordinates Zone
ED008 69.2 70.3 1.1 3.5   526341 7562679   Zone 2
ED008 81 82.1 1.1 0.7 Zone 2
ED008 96.4 97.2 0.8 0.5 Zone 2
ED008 100.2 100.6 0.4 3.9 Zone 2
ED008 106.5 107.7 1.2 2.7 Zone 2
ED008 109.7 110.3 0.6 6.7 Zone 2
ED008 126.5 127 0.5 3.1 Zone 2
ED008 154 154.4 0.4 0.5 Zone 2
ED008 231.4 231.6 0.2 8.1 Zone 2
ED008 249.3 250 0.7 3.8 Zone 2
ED008 255.7 257.7 2 2.4 Zone 2
ED008 260.3 260.5 0.2 0.9 Zone 2
ED008 270.3 272.4 2.1 0.4 Zone 2
ED008 273.3 273.7 0.4 0.5 Zone 2
ED008 278.6 280.4 1.8 1.1 Zone 2
ED008 287.1 290.1 3 1.8 Zone 2
incl. 288 289 1 4.2 Zone 2
ED008 303.3 312.7 9.4 1.3 Zone 2
incl. 305.2 306.9 1.7 4.6 Zone 2
ED008 314.8 315 0.2 3.2 Zone 2
ED008 334.1 335.7 1.6 0.4 Zone 2
ED008 340.2 341.7 1.5 0.7 Zone 2
ED008 348.4 348.9 0.5 0.4 Zone 2
ED009 65.4 66.3 0.9 1   526529 7562615   Zone 1
ED009 85.5 86 0.5 0.5 Zone 1
ED009 247.3 247.6 0.3 9.1 Zone 1
ED009 253.2 258 4.8 1.2 Zone 1
incl. 257.2 258 0.8 5.4 Zone 1
ED009 263.7 264.2 0.5 0.5 Zone 1
ED010 140 141.3 1.3 1.5   526371 7562312   Zone 3
ED010 157.5 159.5 2 1.2 Zone 3
incl. 158.6 159.5 0.9 2.5 Zone 3
ED010 176.4 177.2 0.8 0.3 Zone 3
ED010 191.8 192.4 0.6 0.5 Zone 3
ED011 180.8 181.4 0.6 1   526124 7562677   Zone 2
ED011 199 200 1 0.3 Zone 2
ED011 210 210.8 0.8 1.3 Zone 2
ED011 223.3 225.3 2 0.7 Zone 2
ED011 229.3 232.6 3.3 0.4 Zone 2
ED011 240.3 241.3 1 0.3 Zone 2
ED011 259 260 1 0.5 Zone 2
ED011 274.6 278.1 3.5 4 Zone 2
ED011 296.5 297.5 1 1.6 Zone 2
ED011 310.9 312.2 1.3 0.4 Zone 2
ED011 336.6 336.9 0.3 1.5 Zone 2
ED012 81 81.7 0.7 1.7   526272 7562072   Zone 3
ED016 12.5 17.1 4.6 0.4   526227 7562361   Zone 3
Incl. 16.1 17.1 1 0.9 Zone 3
ED016 42.4 46.5 4.1 1.7 Zone 3
Incl. 42.4 45 2.6 2.4 Zone 3
ED016 84.4 90.2 5.8 0.7 Zone 3
Incl. 84.4 86.2 1.8 0.9 Zone 3
ED016 137.1 139.2 2.1 0.4 Zone 3
ED016 152 153 1 2.9 Zone 3
ED016 154.5 156.5 2 2.8 Zone 3
ED016 172.6 173.2 0.6 1.1 Zone 3
ED016 202.8 204 1.2 0.5 Zone 3
ED016 214.8 216 1.2 0.7 Zone 3
ED016 229.7 231.2 1.5 1.1 Zone 3
ED016 236.4 237.4 1 1.2 Zone 3
ED016 239.6 240.7 1.1 0.6 Zone 3
ED017 19.8 20.8 1 13.4   526306 7562562   Zone1/3
ED017 22.5 23.2 0.7 1.7 Zone1/3
ED017 92.6 93.8 1.2 0.7 Zone1/3
ED017 98 99.7 1.7 1.5 Zone1/3
ED017 100.6 102.8 2.2 1.4 Zone1/3
ED017 104.7 107.3 2.6 0.4 Zone1/3
ED017 207.8 210.7 2.9 0.8 Zone1/3
ED017 223.1 233.9 10.8 0.2 Zone1/3
ED017 235.7 237.2 1.5 0.4 Zone1/3
ED017 248.2 248.8 0.6 0.7 Zone1/3
ED017 256.3 261.6 5.3 0.2 Zone1/3
ED017 276.5 278.1 1.6 1.5 Zone1/3
Incl. 276.5 277 0.5 4.5 Zone1/3
ED019 58.9 61.5 2.6 0.3   526249 7562544   Zone1/3
ED019 127.1 127.5 0.4 0.3 Zone1/3
ED019 129.1 129.7 0.6 0.3 Zone1/3
ED019 139.5 140.4 0.9 0.5 Zone1/3
ED019 174.7 175.8 1.1 0.7 Zone1/3
Incl. 175.2 175.8 0.6 1.2 Zone1/3
ED019 180.9 182.8 1.9 1.8 Zone1/3
Incl. 181.7 182.8 1.1 2.8 Zone1/3
ED019 186.5 187.6 1.1 0.6 Zone1/3
Incl. 186.5 187 0.5 1.2 Zone1/3
ED019 199.1 204.6 5.5 0.6 Zone1/3
Incl. 200.6 202.4 1.8 1.0 Zone1/3
ED019 205.8 209.8 4 0.4 Zone1/3
ED019 214.4 214.9 0.5 1.6 Zone1/3
ED019 222.8 225.5 2.7 0.2 Zone1/3
ED019 230.3 231.8 1.5 0.5 Zone1/3
ED019 249.9 250.3 0.4 0.7 Zone1/3
ED019 261.6 262.1 0.5 0.5 Zone1/3
ED019 265.3 265.7 0.3 0.3 Zone1/3

 

Eureka Technical Disclosure

The Corporation produced its current Mineral Resource Estimate (“MRE”) for the Eureka Project with an effective date of 2 August 2021. The MRE was prepared by SRK Consulting (UK) (“SRK”). An Independent Technical Report titled: “Independent Technical Report: Eureka, Rare Earth Project, Namibia” was originally released on the 15 September 2021, supporting the disclosure of the MRE, and is available on SEDAR and the Corporation’s website.

Quality Assurance / Quality Control

All E-Tech sample assay results have been independently monitored through a quality assurance / quality control (“QA/QC”) program including the insertion of certified reference standards, blanks and duplicate samples. QA/QC samples make up 10% of all samples submitted. Drill core is sawn in half on site and half drill-core samples are securely transported to Activation Laboratories Ltd. sample preparation facility in Windhoek, Namibia. The core is dried, crushed to 90% passing 2 mm, riffle splitting a 250 g sub-sample and pulverizing to 95% passing 105 µm. Sample pulps are sent to Activation Laboratories Ltd. in Ontario, Canada for analysis. REE analysis is by method 8-REE. The sample is milled to 95% -200 mesh. To ensure complete fusion of resistate minerals, lithium metaborate/tetraborate fusion is used with analysis by ICP-OES and ICP-MS.

Qualified Person

Pete Siegfried, BSc. (Hons), M.Sc., is a Consulting Geologist and a director of GeoAfrica Prospecting Services cc and has reviewed and approved the scientific and technical information in this news release. Mr. Siegfried is a member of The Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy (AusIMM) membership number: 221116 (CP Geology), and a Qualified Person for the purposes of National Instrument 43-101. Mr. Siegfried consents to the inclusion of this information for the announcement.

About E-Tech Resources Inc.

E-Tech Resources Inc. (TSXV: REE) (FSE: K2i) is a rare earth exploration and development company focused on developing its Eureka Rare Earths Project in Namibia. The Eureka Project is located approximately 250 km north-west of Namibia’s capital city Windhoek and 140km east of Namibia’s main industrial port Walvis Bay. The project is situated next to the national B1 highway in the Erongo Region of Namibia. The Eureka deposit lies in the Southern Central Zone of the Neoproterozoic Damara Belt within Exclusive Prospecting License (“EPL”) number EPL 6762, which covers farms Eureka 99 and Sukses 90. Namibia is recognized as one of Africa’s most politically stable jurisdictions, with an extremely well-established national infrastructure and a clear and transparent mining law. The Corporation continues to assess new project opportunities and expand its Southern African portfolio.

Further details are available on the Corporation’s website at www.etech-resources.com or contact Elbert Loois, CEO of E-Tech Resources Inc., at +1 (902) 334 1949.

Cautionary Statements

This press release may contain forward-looking information, such as statements regarding the completion of the work in Namibia by E-Tech Resources and future plans and objectives of E-Tech Resources. This information is based on current expectations and assumptions (including assumptions in connection with the continuance of the applicable company as a going concern and general economic and market conditions) that are subject to significant risks and uncertainties that are difficult to predict, including risks relating to the ability to satisfy the conditions to completion of exploration programs and work in Namibia. Actual results may differ materially from results suggested in any forward-looking information. E-Tech Resources assumes no obligation to update forward-looking information in this release, or to update the reasons why actual results could differ from those reflected in the forward-looking information unless and until required by applicable securities laws. Additional information identifying risks and uncertainties is contained in filings made by E-Tech Resources with Canadian securities regulators, copies of which are available at www.sedar.com.

Neither TSX Venture Exchange nor its Regulation Services Provider (as that term is defined in policies of the TSX Venture Exchange) accepts responsibility for the adequacy or accuracy of this release.

To view the source version of this press release, please visit https://www.newsfilecorp.com/release/113314

Powered by WPeMatico

Fintech

How to identify authenticity in crypto influencer channels

Published

on

 

Modern brands stake on influencer marketing, with 76% of users making a purchase after seeing a product on social media.The cryptocurrency industry is no exception to this trend. However, promoting crypto products through influencer marketing can be particularly challenging. Crypto influencers pose a significant risk to a brand’s reputation and ROI due to rampant scams. Approximately 80% of channels provide fake statistics, including followers counts and engagement metrics. Additionally, this niche is characterized by high CPMs, which can increase the risk of financial loss for brands.

In this article Nadia Bubennnikova, Head of agency Famesters, will explore the most important things to look for in crypto channels to find the perfect match for influencer marketing collaborations.

 

  1. Comments 

There are several levels related to this point.

 

LEVEL 1

Analyze approximately 10 of the channel’s latest videos, looking through the comments to ensure they are not purchased from dubious sources. For example, such comments as “Yes sir, great video!”; “Thanks!”; “Love you man!”; “Quality content”, and others most certainly are bot-generated and should be avoided.

Just to compare: 

LEVEL 2

Don’t rush to conclude that you’ve discovered the perfect crypto channel just because you’ve come across some logical comments that align with the video’s topic. This may seem controversial, but it’s important to dive deeper. When you encounter a channel with logical comments, ensure that they are unique and not duplicated under the description box. Some creators are smarter than just buying comments from the first link that Google shows you when you search “buy YouTube comments”. They generate topics, provide multiple examples, or upload lists of examples, all produced by AI. You can either manually review the comments or use a script to parse all the YouTube comments into an Excel file. Then, add a formula to highlight any duplicates.

LEVEL 3

It is also a must to check the names of the profiles that leave the comments: most of the bot-generated comments are easy to track: they will all have the usernames made of random symbols and numbers, random first and last name combinations, “Habibi”, etc. No profile pictures on all comments is also a red flag.

 

LEVEL 4

Another important factor to consider when assessing comment authenticity is the posting date. If all the comments were posted on the same day, it’s likely that the traffic was purchased.

 

2. Average views number per video

This is indeed one of the key metrics to consider when selecting an influencer for collaboration, regardless of the product type. What specific factors should we focus on?

First & foremost: the views dynamics on the channel. The most desirable type of YouTube channel in terms of views is one that maintains stable viewership across all of its videos. This stability serves as proof of an active and loyal audience genuinely interested in the creator’s content, unlike channels where views vary significantly from one video to another.

Many unauthentic crypto channels not only buy YouTube comments but also invest in increasing video views to create the impression of stability. So, what exactly should we look at in terms of views? Firstly, calculate the average number of views based on the ten latest videos. Then, compare this figure to the views of the most recent videos posted within the past week. If you notice that these new videos have nearly the same number of views as those posted a month or two ago, it’s a clear red flag. Typically, a YouTube channel experiences lower views on new videos, with the number increasing organically each day as the audience engages with the content. If you see a video posted just three days ago already garnering 30k views, matching the total views of older videos, it’s a sign of fraudulent traffic purchased to create the illusion of view stability.

 

3. Influencer’s channel statistics

The primary statistics of interest are region and demographic split, and sometimes the device types of the viewers.

LEVEL 1

When reviewing the shared statistics, the first step is to request a video screencast instead of a simple screenshot. This is because it takes more time to organically edit a video than a screenshot, making it harder to manipulate the statistics. If the creator refuses, step two (if only screenshots are provided) is to download them and check the file’s properties on your computer. Look for details such as whether it was created with Adobe Photoshop or the color profile, typically Adobe RGB, to determine if the screenshot has been edited.

LEVEL 2

After confirming the authenticity of the stats screenshot, it’s crucial to analyze the data. For instance, if you’re examining a channel conducted in Spanish with all videos filmed in the same language, it would raise concerns to find a significant audience from countries like India or Turkey. This discrepancy, where the audience doesn’t align with regions known for speaking the language, is a red flag.

If we’re considering an English-language crypto channel, it typically suggests an international audience, as English’s global use for quality educational content on niche topics like crypto. However, certain considerations apply. For instance, if an English-speaking channel shows a significant percentage of Polish viewers (15% to 30%) without any mention of the Polish language, it could indicate fake followers and views. However, if the channel’s creator is Polish, occasionally posts videos in Polish alongside English, and receives Polish comments, it’s important not to rush to conclusions.

Example of statistics

 

Wrapping up

These are the main factors to consider when selecting an influencer to promote your crypto product. Once you’ve launched the campaign, there are also some markers to show which creators did bring the authentic traffic and which used some tools to create the illusion of an active and engaged audience. While this may seem obvious, it’s still worth mentioning. After the video is posted, allow 5-7 days for it to accumulate a basic number of views, then check performance metrics such as views, clicks, click-through rate (CTR), signups, and conversion rate (CR) from clicks to signups.

If you overlooked some red flags when selecting crypto channels for your launch, you might find the following outcomes: channels with high views numbers and high CTRs, demonstrating the real interest of the audience, yet with remarkably low conversion rates. In the worst-case scenario, you might witness thousands of clicks resulting in zero to just a few signups. While this might suggest technical issues in other industries, in crypto campaigns it indicates that the creator engaged in the campaign not only bought fake views and comments but also link clicks. And this happens more often than you may realize.

Summing up, choosing the right crypto creator to promote your product is indeed a tricky job that requires a lot of resources to be put into the search process. 

Author Nadia Bubennikova, Head of agency  at Famesters

Author

Nadia Bubennikova, Head of agency at Famesters

Continue Reading

Fintech

Central banks and the FinTech sector unite to change global payments space

Published

on

central-banks-and-the-fintech-sector-unite-to-change-global-payments-space

 

The BIS, along with seven leading central banks and a cohort of private financial firms, has embarked on an ambitious venture known as Project Agorá.

Named after the Greek word for “marketplace,” this initiative stands at the forefront of exploring the potential of tokenisation to significantly enhance the operational efficiency of the monetary system worldwide.

Central to this pioneering project are the Bank of France (on behalf of the Eurosystem), the Bank of Japan, the Bank of Korea, the Bank of Mexico, the Swiss National Bank, the Bank of England, and the Federal Reserve Bank of New York. These institutions have joined forces under the banner of Project Agorá, in partnership with an extensive assembly of private financial entities convened by the Institute of International Finance (IIF).

At the heart of Project Agorá is the pursuit of integrating tokenised commercial bank deposits with tokenised wholesale central bank money within a unified, public-private programmable financial platform. By harnessing the advanced capabilities of smart contracts and programmability, the project aspires to unlock new transactional possibilities that were previously infeasible or impractical, thereby fostering novel opportunities that could benefit businesses and consumers alike.

The collaborative effort seeks to address and surmount a variety of structural inefficiencies that currently plague cross-border payments. These challenges include disparate legal, regulatory, and technical standards; varying operating hours and time zones; and the heightened complexity associated with conducting financial integrity checks (such as anti-money laundering and customer verification procedures), which are often redundantly executed across multiple stages of a single transaction due to the involvement of several intermediaries.

As a beacon of experimental and exploratory projects, the BIS Innovation Hub is committed to delivering public goods to the global central banking community through initiatives like Project Agorá. In line with this mission, the BIS will soon issue a call for expressions of interest from private financial institutions eager to contribute to this ground-breaking project. The IIF will facilitate the involvement of private sector participants, extending an invitation to regulated financial institutions representing each of the seven aforementioned currencies to partake in this transformative endeavour.

Source: fintech.globa

The post Central banks and the FinTech sector unite to change global payments space appeared first on HIPTHER Alerts.

Continue Reading

Fintech

TD Bank inks multi-year strategic partnership with Google Cloud

Published

on

td-bank-inks-multi-year-strategic-partnership-with-google-cloud

 

TD Bank has inked a multi-year deal with Google Cloud as it looks to streamline the development and deployment of new products and services.

The deal will see the Canadian banking group integrate the vendor’s cloud services into a wider portion of its technology solutions portfolio, a move which TD expects will enable it “to respond quickly to changing customer expectations by rolling out new features, updates, or entirely new financial products at an accelerated pace”.

This marks an expansion of the already established relationship between TD Bank and Google Cloud after the group previously adopted the vendor’s Google Kubernetes Engine (GKE) for TD Securities Automated Trading (TDSAT), the Chicago-based subsidiary of its investment banking unit, TD Securities.

TDSAT uses GKE for process automation and quantitative modelling across fixed income markets, resulting in the development of a “data-driven research platform” capable of processing large research workloads in trading.

Dan Bosman, SVP and CIO of TD Securities, claims the infrastructure has so far supported TDSAT with “compute-intensive quantitative analysis” while expanding the subsidiary’s “trading volumes and portfolio size”.

TD’s new partnership with Google Cloud will see the group attempt to replicate the same level of success across its entire portfolio.

Source: fintechfutures.com

The post TD Bank inks multi-year strategic partnership with Google Cloud appeared first on HIPTHER Alerts.

Continue Reading

Trending