Connect with us
MARE BALTICUM Gaming & TECH Summit 2024

Fintech

Gold Fund Holdings Update – November 2022 and Attribution Analysis

Published

on

Toronto, Ontario–(Newsfile Corp. – November 24, 2022) – This report details the most recent portfolio holdings for Precious Metal Managed Funds and summarizes changes in portfolio holdings.

A Copy of the Full Report is Available at the Link Below:

https://mailchi.mp/mineralfunds/portfolio-holdings-update-november-2022

Gold & Precious Metal Funds included in this report:

Domicile Fund Name Fund Fees Holdings Report
Funds Reporting Monthly
USA Fidelity Select Gold Summary Sep, 2022
USA Franklin Gold & Precious Metals Fund (USA) Summary Oct, 2022
Luxembourg Franklin Gold & Precious Metals Fund (Lux) Summary Oct, 2022
USA VanEck International Investors Gold Fund Summary Oct, 2022
USA VanEck VIP Global Gold Fund Summary Oct, 2022
Funds Reporting Quarterly
USA American Century Global Gold Fund Summary Sep, 2022
USA USAA Precious Metals and Minerals Fund Summary Sep, 2022
USA US Global Investors Gold and Precious Metals Fund Summary Jun, 2022
USA US Global Investors World Precious Minerals Summary Jun, 2022
USA OCM Gold Fund Summary Aug, 2022
Funds Reporting Annually / Semi Annually
Luxembourg Konwave Gold Equity Fund Summary Jun, 2022
Luxembourg Ninety One Global Gold Fund (Lux) Summary Jun, 2022
Luxembourg Invesco Gold and Special Minerals Fund (Lux) Summary Aug, 2022
Luxembourg NESTOR Gold Fund Summary Jun, 2022
Luxembourg Konwave Sustainable Gold Equity Fund Summary Jun, 2022
Luxembourg Claresco Or et Metaux Precieux Summary Jun, 2022
UK BlackRock Gold & General Fund Summary Aug, 2022
UK Junior Gold and Silver Miners Fund Summary Aug, 2022
France Amundi Actions Or Summary Jun, 2022
Cayman Island Gold 2000 Ltd. Summary May, 2022
Cayman Island Gold 3000 Ltd. Summary Jun, 2022
Germany Earth Gold Fund UI Summary Jun, 2022
Austria Amundi Gold Stock Summary Oct, 2022

 

A portfolio holding ‘attribution analysis‘ is undertaken on the portfolios of gold funds that report asset allocations monthly, and on any fund with assets in excess of $1 Billion USD reporting during the period.

The analysis includes a list of companies which are new to a portfolio in the period ‘New Company Holdings’, and companies which have been eliminated from a portfolio during the period ‘Companies Divested’.

FUNDS REPORTING MONTHLY

Fidelity Select Gold Fund

30.Sept.2022 $1,179 M USD
New Company Holdings Companies Divested
None None
Largest Position:
Newmont Corp. (NYSE: NEM) 11.6%

 

Franklin Gold & Precious Metals Fund (USA)                          Franklin Gold & Precious Metals Fund (Lux)

31.Oct.2022 $831 M USD 31.Oct.2022 $329 M USD
New Company Holdings Companies Divested New Company Holdings Companies Divested
De Grey Mining Ltd. Argonaut Gold Inc. De Grey Mining Ltd. Argonaut Gold Inc.
Dacian Gold Inc. Dacian Gold Inc.
Largest Position: Largest Position:
Endeavor Mining (TSX: EDV) 5.4% Endeavor Mining (TSX: EDV) 5.5%

 

VanEck International Investors Gold Fund                             VanEck VIP Global Gold Fund

31.Oct.2022 $588 M USD 31.Oct.2022 $37 M USD
New Company Holdings Companies Divested New Company Holdings Companies Divested
None Gold Fields Limited None Gold Fields Limited
Equinox Gold Corp. Equinox Gold Corp.
Nighthawk Gold Corp. Nighthawk Gold Corp.
Perpetua Resources Corp. Perpetua Resources Corp.
Pure Gold Mining Inc. Pure Gold Mining Inc.
Largest Position: Largest Position:
Agnico Eagle M. Ltd. (TSX: AEM) 9.8% Agnico Eagle M. Ltd. (TSX: AEM) 9.7%

 

FUNDS REPORTING MONTHLY          ATTRIBUTION ANALYSIS

Fidelity Select Gold Fund

AUM for Fidelity Gold Fund decreased in September from $1,186 M USD to $1,179 M USD (-0.6%).

The Fund did not take on any new positions, nor fully divest from any positions during the month. The Fund’s largest position remained Newmont Corp. (NYSE: NEM) with the weighting increasing very slightly on the month from 11.3% of the portfolio to 11.6% of the portfolio.

Franklin Gold & Precious Metals Fund (USA)

AUM for Franklin Gold and Precious Metals Fund (USA) decreased in October from $839 M USD to $831 M USD (-1.0%).

The Fund took up a new position in Australian listed De Grey Mining Ltd. (ASX: DEG). De Grey is expanding the Hemi discovery in Australia’s Pilbara region. Hemi is an intrusion-related gold deposit type considered new to the Pilbara region and is showing gold mineralisation scale potential not previously encountered in the Mallina Basin.

During the month of October, the Fund divested of a holding in Australian listed Dacian Gold Inc. (ASX: DEG) after shares doubled in price pursuant to a takeover offer from Genesis Minerals Ltd. (ASX: GMD). The Fund also divested from its holding of Argonaut Gold Ltd. (TSX: AR).

Franklin Gold & Precious Metals Fund (Lux)

AUM for Franklin Gold and Precious Metals Fund (Lux) decreased in October from $334 M USD to $329 M USD (-1.5%).

VanEck International Investors Gold Fund

AUM for VanEck International Investors Gold Fund decreased in October from $611 M USD to $588 M USD (-3.8%).

During October the Fund divested fully from: Gold Fields Ltd. (JSE: GFI), Equinox Gold Corp. (TSX: EQX), Nighthawk Gold Corp. (TSX: NHK), Perpetua Resources Corp. (TSX: PPTA) and Pure Gold Mining Inc. (CVE: PGM.H).

After a difficult year for Pure Gold Mining Inc. (CVE: PGM.H) in which new senior management were recruited, and new credit facilities were secured and extended, on October 24th the company announced suspension of operations and closure of the PureGold Mine. The Fund liquidated its position in Pure Gold Mining Inc. during the month of October.

VanEck VIP Global Gold Fund

AUM for VanEck VIP Gold Gold Fund decreased in October from $39 M USD to $37 M USD (-5.1%).

The Fund’s largest holding remains Agnico Eagle Mines Ltd. (TSX: AEM), the world’s third largest publicly listed gold producer, representing 9.7% of the portfolio.

FUNDS AUM > $1 BILLION USD

BlackRock Gold & General Fund

Fund Comparison: February 28th, 2022 / August 31st, 2022

31.Aug.2022 £874.75 M GBP
New Company Holdings Companies Divested
Predictive Discovery Great Bear Resources
Rupert Resources Pretium Resources
Yamana Gold
Largest Position:
Barrick Gold Corp. (TSX: ABX) 7.4%

 

FUNDS AUM > $1 BILLION USD ATTRIBUTION ANALYSIS

BlackRock Gold & General Fund

AUM for BlackRock Gold and General Fund decreased over the period from: £1,173.58 M GBP on 28th February 2022 to £874.75 M GBP on 31st August 2022 (-25.5%). On August 31st the Fund’s largest holding was Barrick Gold Corp. (TSX: ABX) representing 7.4% of the portfolio.

Two of the Fund’s company investments were acquired during the period. Pretium Resources Inc. (TSX: PVG) was acquired by Newcrest Mining Ltd. (ASX: NCM) and Great Bear Resources Ltd. (TSX-V: GBR) was acquired by Kinross Gold Corp. (TSX: K).

During the period, the Fund took new positions in: Predictive Discovery Ltd. (ASX: PDI), Rupert Resources Ltd. (CVE: RUP) and Yamana Gold Inc. (TSX: YRI).

Predictive Discovery Ltd. (ASX: PDI) is focused on developing the Tier-1 Bankan Gold Discovery in Guinea, West Africa, and Rupert Resources Ltd. (CVE: RUP) is advancing the new Ikkari gold discovery in Lapland, Northern Finland. The Predictive Discovery Ltd. Bankan Gold Discovery is billed as the largest gold discovery in West Africa in the past decade.

Yamana Gold Inc. (TSX: YRI) is a Canadian company that owns and operates gold, silver and copper mines in Canada, Chile, Brazil and Argentina. Yamana Gold Inc. is currently the subject of a bidding competition between Agnico Eagle Mines Ltd. (TSX: AEM) and Pan American Silver Corp. (TSX: PAAS) on the one side and Gold Fields Ltd. (JSE: GFI) on the other.

‘Increasing Shareholding’ and ‘Decreasing Shareholding’ fields identify companies to which a fund is either increasing or, alternatively, decreasing exposure. This portfolio analysis information is available to Substack subscribers only.

A complete list of Precious Metal Managed Funds and their respective portfolio holdings can be found at:

https://mineralfunds.com/gold-funds/

Reported by: Khadijah Samnani, Analyst Supported By: Christopher Berlet BSc, CFA

For further information please contact:
(416) 525 – 6869
[email protected]

To view the source version of this press release, please visit https://www.newsfilecorp.com/release/145661

Fintech

How to identify authenticity in crypto influencer channels

Published

on

 

Modern brands stake on influencer marketing, with 76% of users making a purchase after seeing a product on social media.The cryptocurrency industry is no exception to this trend. However, promoting crypto products through influencer marketing can be particularly challenging. Crypto influencers pose a significant risk to a brand’s reputation and ROI due to rampant scams. Approximately 80% of channels provide fake statistics, including followers counts and engagement metrics. Additionally, this niche is characterized by high CPMs, which can increase the risk of financial loss for brands.

In this article Nadia Bubennnikova, Head of agency Famesters, will explore the most important things to look for in crypto channels to find the perfect match for influencer marketing collaborations.

 

  1. Comments 

There are several levels related to this point.

 

LEVEL 1

Analyze approximately 10 of the channel’s latest videos, looking through the comments to ensure they are not purchased from dubious sources. For example, such comments as “Yes sir, great video!”; “Thanks!”; “Love you man!”; “Quality content”, and others most certainly are bot-generated and should be avoided.

Just to compare: 

LEVEL 2

Don’t rush to conclude that you’ve discovered the perfect crypto channel just because you’ve come across some logical comments that align with the video’s topic. This may seem controversial, but it’s important to dive deeper. When you encounter a channel with logical comments, ensure that they are unique and not duplicated under the description box. Some creators are smarter than just buying comments from the first link that Google shows you when you search “buy YouTube comments”. They generate topics, provide multiple examples, or upload lists of examples, all produced by AI. You can either manually review the comments or use a script to parse all the YouTube comments into an Excel file. Then, add a formula to highlight any duplicates.

LEVEL 3

It is also a must to check the names of the profiles that leave the comments: most of the bot-generated comments are easy to track: they will all have the usernames made of random symbols and numbers, random first and last name combinations, “Habibi”, etc. No profile pictures on all comments is also a red flag.

 

LEVEL 4

Another important factor to consider when assessing comment authenticity is the posting date. If all the comments were posted on the same day, it’s likely that the traffic was purchased.

 

2. Average views number per video

This is indeed one of the key metrics to consider when selecting an influencer for collaboration, regardless of the product type. What specific factors should we focus on?

First & foremost: the views dynamics on the channel. The most desirable type of YouTube channel in terms of views is one that maintains stable viewership across all of its videos. This stability serves as proof of an active and loyal audience genuinely interested in the creator’s content, unlike channels where views vary significantly from one video to another.

Many unauthentic crypto channels not only buy YouTube comments but also invest in increasing video views to create the impression of stability. So, what exactly should we look at in terms of views? Firstly, calculate the average number of views based on the ten latest videos. Then, compare this figure to the views of the most recent videos posted within the past week. If you notice that these new videos have nearly the same number of views as those posted a month or two ago, it’s a clear red flag. Typically, a YouTube channel experiences lower views on new videos, with the number increasing organically each day as the audience engages with the content. If you see a video posted just three days ago already garnering 30k views, matching the total views of older videos, it’s a sign of fraudulent traffic purchased to create the illusion of view stability.

 

3. Influencer’s channel statistics

The primary statistics of interest are region and demographic split, and sometimes the device types of the viewers.

LEVEL 1

When reviewing the shared statistics, the first step is to request a video screencast instead of a simple screenshot. This is because it takes more time to organically edit a video than a screenshot, making it harder to manipulate the statistics. If the creator refuses, step two (if only screenshots are provided) is to download them and check the file’s properties on your computer. Look for details such as whether it was created with Adobe Photoshop or the color profile, typically Adobe RGB, to determine if the screenshot has been edited.

LEVEL 2

After confirming the authenticity of the stats screenshot, it’s crucial to analyze the data. For instance, if you’re examining a channel conducted in Spanish with all videos filmed in the same language, it would raise concerns to find a significant audience from countries like India or Turkey. This discrepancy, where the audience doesn’t align with regions known for speaking the language, is a red flag.

If we’re considering an English-language crypto channel, it typically suggests an international audience, as English’s global use for quality educational content on niche topics like crypto. However, certain considerations apply. For instance, if an English-speaking channel shows a significant percentage of Polish viewers (15% to 30%) without any mention of the Polish language, it could indicate fake followers and views. However, if the channel’s creator is Polish, occasionally posts videos in Polish alongside English, and receives Polish comments, it’s important not to rush to conclusions.

Example of statistics

 

Wrapping up

These are the main factors to consider when selecting an influencer to promote your crypto product. Once you’ve launched the campaign, there are also some markers to show which creators did bring the authentic traffic and which used some tools to create the illusion of an active and engaged audience. While this may seem obvious, it’s still worth mentioning. After the video is posted, allow 5-7 days for it to accumulate a basic number of views, then check performance metrics such as views, clicks, click-through rate (CTR), signups, and conversion rate (CR) from clicks to signups.

If you overlooked some red flags when selecting crypto channels for your launch, you might find the following outcomes: channels with high views numbers and high CTRs, demonstrating the real interest of the audience, yet with remarkably low conversion rates. In the worst-case scenario, you might witness thousands of clicks resulting in zero to just a few signups. While this might suggest technical issues in other industries, in crypto campaigns it indicates that the creator engaged in the campaign not only bought fake views and comments but also link clicks. And this happens more often than you may realize.

Summing up, choosing the right crypto creator to promote your product is indeed a tricky job that requires a lot of resources to be put into the search process. 

Author Nadia Bubennikova, Head of agency  at Famesters

Author

Nadia Bubennikova, Head of agency at Famesters

Continue Reading

Fintech

Central banks and the FinTech sector unite to change global payments space

Published

on

central-banks-and-the-fintech-sector-unite-to-change-global-payments-space

 

The BIS, along with seven leading central banks and a cohort of private financial firms, has embarked on an ambitious venture known as Project Agorá.

Named after the Greek word for “marketplace,” this initiative stands at the forefront of exploring the potential of tokenisation to significantly enhance the operational efficiency of the monetary system worldwide.

Central to this pioneering project are the Bank of France (on behalf of the Eurosystem), the Bank of Japan, the Bank of Korea, the Bank of Mexico, the Swiss National Bank, the Bank of England, and the Federal Reserve Bank of New York. These institutions have joined forces under the banner of Project Agorá, in partnership with an extensive assembly of private financial entities convened by the Institute of International Finance (IIF).

At the heart of Project Agorá is the pursuit of integrating tokenised commercial bank deposits with tokenised wholesale central bank money within a unified, public-private programmable financial platform. By harnessing the advanced capabilities of smart contracts and programmability, the project aspires to unlock new transactional possibilities that were previously infeasible or impractical, thereby fostering novel opportunities that could benefit businesses and consumers alike.

The collaborative effort seeks to address and surmount a variety of structural inefficiencies that currently plague cross-border payments. These challenges include disparate legal, regulatory, and technical standards; varying operating hours and time zones; and the heightened complexity associated with conducting financial integrity checks (such as anti-money laundering and customer verification procedures), which are often redundantly executed across multiple stages of a single transaction due to the involvement of several intermediaries.

As a beacon of experimental and exploratory projects, the BIS Innovation Hub is committed to delivering public goods to the global central banking community through initiatives like Project Agorá. In line with this mission, the BIS will soon issue a call for expressions of interest from private financial institutions eager to contribute to this ground-breaking project. The IIF will facilitate the involvement of private sector participants, extending an invitation to regulated financial institutions representing each of the seven aforementioned currencies to partake in this transformative endeavour.

Source: fintech.globa

The post Central banks and the FinTech sector unite to change global payments space appeared first on HIPTHER Alerts.

Continue Reading

Fintech

TD Bank inks multi-year strategic partnership with Google Cloud

Published

on

td-bank-inks-multi-year-strategic-partnership-with-google-cloud

 

TD Bank has inked a multi-year deal with Google Cloud as it looks to streamline the development and deployment of new products and services.

The deal will see the Canadian banking group integrate the vendor’s cloud services into a wider portion of its technology solutions portfolio, a move which TD expects will enable it “to respond quickly to changing customer expectations by rolling out new features, updates, or entirely new financial products at an accelerated pace”.

This marks an expansion of the already established relationship between TD Bank and Google Cloud after the group previously adopted the vendor’s Google Kubernetes Engine (GKE) for TD Securities Automated Trading (TDSAT), the Chicago-based subsidiary of its investment banking unit, TD Securities.

TDSAT uses GKE for process automation and quantitative modelling across fixed income markets, resulting in the development of a “data-driven research platform” capable of processing large research workloads in trading.

Dan Bosman, SVP and CIO of TD Securities, claims the infrastructure has so far supported TDSAT with “compute-intensive quantitative analysis” while expanding the subsidiary’s “trading volumes and portfolio size”.

TD’s new partnership with Google Cloud will see the group attempt to replicate the same level of success across its entire portfolio.

Source: fintechfutures.com

The post TD Bank inks multi-year strategic partnership with Google Cloud appeared first on HIPTHER Alerts.

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Advertisement

Latest news

Trending