Fintech PR
TD Bank Group Reports First Quarter 2020 Results

TD Bank Group (“TD” or the “Bank”) today announced its financial results for the first quarter ended January 31, 2020. First quarter reported earnings were $3 billion, up 24% on a reported basis and 4% on an adjusted basis, compared with the same quarter last year.
“TD started the year with a solid quarter, reflecting volume growth on both sides of the border in our Retail businesses and strong revenues and earnings in our Wholesale business,” said Bharat Masrani, Group President and Chief Executive Officer, TD Bank Group. “Our strong performance demonstrates the advantages of our strategy and proven business model, as we continued to acquire new customers and engage with them in more innovative and personalized ways.”
The Bank also announced a dividend increase of five cents per common share for the quarter ending in April, an increase of 7%.
Canadian Retail
Canadian Retail reported net income was $1,789 million, up 30% from the first quarter last year, primarily reflecting charges related to the Air Canada agreement in the first quarter of 2019. Adjusted net income was $1,813 million, a decrease of 2% compared with the same quarter last year. Revenue growth of 4%, reflecting volume-based increases in net interest and other income across the businesses, was more than offset by higher non-interest expenses, provisions for credit losses, and insurance claims.
Canadian Retail continued to invest in its business and capabilities, further strengthening its position as Canada’s leading credit card issuer with the introduction of a new line of business cards that give business customers added flexibility and choice. In addition, TD Direct Investing was ranked highest among the banks in The Globe and Mail’s annual review of online brokers, reflecting continued investments in its WebBroker and mobile platforms and resources to help customers achieve their financial goals.
U.S. Retail
U.S. Retail net income was $1,146 million (US$869 million), a decrease of 8% (7% in U.S. dollars), compared with the same quarter last year. TD Ameritrade contributed $201 million (US$152 million) in earnings to the segment, a decrease of 35% (35% in U.S. dollars) compared to the same quarter last year, primarily due to reduced trading commissions.
The U.S. Retail Bank, which excludes the Bank’s investment in TD Ameritrade, contributed $945 million (US$717 million), up 2% (2% in U.S. dollars) from the same quarter last year. Revenue was down 2% as loan and deposit volume growth was offset by reduced margins given the lower interest rate environment. Provision for income taxes benefitted from changes in estimates. The U.S. Retail Bank continued to invest in its digital capabilities and this quarter, increased its number of mobile active customers by 12%. TD Bank, America’s Most Convenient Bank®, also recorded a milestone achievement in the quarter, ranking “highest in customer satisfaction”, among the national banks, according to the J.D. Power 2019 U.S. National Banking Satisfaction Study1 that evaluated banks from across the country.
_______________________ |
|
1 |
TD Bank received the highest score in the J.D. Power 2019 U.S. National Banking Satisfaction Study of customers’ satisfaction with bank products and services among national banks. Visit jdpower.com/awards. |
Wholesale
Wholesale Banking reported net income of $281 million this quarter, an increase of $298 million, compared to the same quarter last year. Revenue for the quarter was $1,046 million, an increase of $464 million, compared with the first quarter last year, reflecting higher trading-related revenue and underwriting fees compared with the first quarter last year when the business experienced challenging market conditions. The Wholesale Bank continued to grow its banking and corporate lending relationships and gain market share, reflecting the investments made in its U.S. dollar strategy.
Capital
TD’s Common Equity Tier 1 Capital ratio on a Basel lll fully phased-in basis was 11.7%.
Innovation
“We continued to enhance our digital capabilities to provide customers with personalized and connected experiences and the ability to manage their finances across all of our channels,” continued Masrani. “Since launching our artificial intelligence-powered chatbot TD Clari last year, we have seen more than 90% of mobile chat interactions handled instantly. These and other investments are extending our competitive advantage and deepening our customer relationships across the Bank.”
Conclusion
“We are building for the future and are making strategic investments to extend our market differentiation and create lasting, trusted customer relationships across our businesses,” added Masrani. “While macroeconomic conditions may fluctuate, our strategy is clear, and our more than 85,000 colleagues are focused with passion and commitment on the work ahead.”
The foregoing contains forward-looking statements. Please refer to the “Caution Regarding Forward-Looking Statements”.
Caution Regarding Forward-Looking Statements From time to time, the Bank (as defined in this document) makes written and/or oral forward-looking statements, including in this document, in other filings with Canadian regulators or the United States (U.S.) Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), and in other communications. In addition, representatives of the Bank may make forward-looking statements orally to analysts, investors, the media and others. All such statements are made pursuant to the “safe harbour” provisions of, and are intended to be forward-looking statements under, applicable Canadian and U.S. securities legislation, including the U.S. Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, statements made in this document, the Management’s Discussion and Analysis (“2019 MD&A”) in the Bank’s 2019 Annual Report under the heading “Economic Summary and Outlook”, for the Canadian Retail, U.S. Retail, and Wholesale Banking segments under headings “Business Outlook and Focus for 2020”, and for the Corporate segment, “Focus for 2020”, and in other statements regarding the Bank’s objectives and priorities for 2020 and beyond and strategies to achieve them, the regulatory environment in which the Bank operates, and the Bank’s anticipated financial performance. Forward-looking statements are typically identified by words such as “will”, “would”, “should”, “believe”, “expect”, “anticipate”, “intend”, “estimate”, “plan”, “goal”, “target”, “may”, and “could”. By their very nature, these forward-looking statements require the Bank to make assumptions and are subject to inherent risks and uncertainties, general and specific. Especially in light of the uncertainty related to the physical, financial, economic, political, and regulatory environments, such risks and uncertainties – many of which are beyond the Bank’s control and the effects of which can be difficult to predict – may cause actual results to differ materially from the expectations expressed in the forward-looking statements. Risk factors that could cause, individually or in the aggregate, such differences include: credit, market (including equity, commodity, foreign exchange, interest rate, and credit spreads), liquidity, operational (including technology, cyber security, and infrastructure), model, reputational, insurance, strategic, regulatory, legal, conduct, environmental, capital adequacy, and other risks. Examples of such risk factors include the general business and economic conditions in the regions in which the Bank operates; geopolitical risk; the ability of the Bank to execute on long-term strategies and shorter-term key strategic priorities, including the successful completion of acquisitions and dispositions, business retention plans, and strategic plans; the ability of the Bank to attract, develop, and retain key executives; disruptions in or attacks (including cyber-attacks or data security breaches) on the Bank’s information technology, internet, network access or other voice or data communications systems or services; fraud or other criminal activity to which the Bank is exposed; the failure of third parties to comply with their obligations to the Bank or its affiliates, including relating to the care and control of information; the impact of new and changes to, or application of, current laws and regulations, including without limitation tax laws, capital guidelines and liquidity regulatory guidance and the bank recapitalization “bail-in” regime; exposure related to significant litigation and regulatory matters; increased competition from incumbents and non-traditional competitors, including Fintech and big technology competitors; changes to the Bank’s credit ratings; changes in currency and interest rates (including the possibility of negative interest rates); increased funding costs and market volatility due to market illiquidity and competition for funding; Interbank Offered Rate (IBOR) transition risk; critical accounting estimates and changes to accounting standards, policies, and methods used by the Bank; existing and potential international debt crises; environmental and social risk; and the occurrence of natural and unnatural catastrophic events and claims resulting from such events. The Bank cautions that the preceding list is not exhaustive of all possible risk factors and other factors could also adversely affect the Bank’s results. For more detailed information, please refer to the “Risk Factors and Management” section of the 2019 MD&A, as may be updated in subsequently filed quarterly reports to shareholders and news releases (as applicable) related to any events or transactions discussed under the headings “Significant and Subsequent Events, and Pending Transactions” and “Significant Events and Pending Transactions” in the relevant MD&A, which applicable releases may be found on www.td.com. All such factors should be considered carefully, as well as other uncertainties and potential events, and the inherent uncertainty of forward-looking statements, when making decisions with respect to the Bank and the Bank cautions readers not to place undue reliance on the Bank’s forward-looking statements. |
This document was reviewed by the Bank‘s Audit Committee and was approved by the Bank‘s Board of Directors, on the Audit Committee‘s recommendation, prior to its release.
TABLE 1: FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS |
||||||||||||||||||||
(millions of Canadian dollars, except as noted) |
As at or for the three months ended |
|||||||||||||||||||
January 31 |
October 31 |
January 31 |
||||||||||||||||||
2020 |
2019 |
2019 |
||||||||||||||||||
Results of operations |
||||||||||||||||||||
Total revenue – reported |
$ |
10,609 |
$ |
10,340 |
$ |
9,998 |
||||||||||||||
Total revenue – adjusted |
10,609 |
10,340 |
9,998 |
|||||||||||||||||
Provision for credit losses |
919 |
891 |
850 |
|||||||||||||||||
Insurance claims and related expenses |
780 |
705 |
702 |
|||||||||||||||||
Non-interest expenses – reported |
5,467 |
5,543 |
5,855 |
|||||||||||||||||
Non-interest expenses – adjusted1 |
5,397 |
5,463 |
5,161 |
|||||||||||||||||
Net income – reported |
2,989 |
2,856 |
2,410 |
|||||||||||||||||
Net income – adjusted1 |
3,072 |
2,946 |
2,953 |
|||||||||||||||||
Financial position (billions of Canadian dollars) |
||||||||||||||||||||
Total loans net of allowance for loan losses |
$ |
693.2 |
$ |
684.6 |
$ |
648.5 |
||||||||||||||
Total assets |
1,457.4 |
1,415.3 |
1,322.5 |
|||||||||||||||||
Total deposits |
908.4 |
887.0 |
849.3 |
|||||||||||||||||
Total equity |
88.8 |
87.7 |
81.7 |
|||||||||||||||||
Total risk-weighted assets |
476.0 |
456.0 |
439.3 |
|||||||||||||||||
Financial ratios |
||||||||||||||||||||
Return on common equity (ROE) – reported |
14.2 |
% |
13.6 |
% |
12.2 |
% |
||||||||||||||
Return on common equity – adjusted2 |
14.6 |
14.0 |
15.0 |
|||||||||||||||||
Return on tangible common equity (ROTCE)2 |
19.6 |
18.9 |
17.5 |
|||||||||||||||||
Return on tangible common equity – adjusted2 |
19.7 |
19.1 |
21.0 |
|||||||||||||||||
Efficiency ratio – reported |
51.5 |
53.6 |
58.6 |
|||||||||||||||||
Efficiency ratio – adjusted1 |
50.9 |
52.8 |
51.6 |
|||||||||||||||||
Provision for credit losses as a % of net average loans |
||||||||||||||||||||
and acceptances3 |
0.52 |
0.51 |
0.50 |
|||||||||||||||||
Common share information – reported (Canadian dollars) |
||||||||||||||||||||
Per share earnings |
||||||||||||||||||||
Basic |
$ |
1.61 |
$ |
1.54 |
$ |
1.27 |
||||||||||||||
Diluted |
1.61 |
1.54 |
1.27 |
|||||||||||||||||
Dividends per share |
0.74 |
0.74 |
0.67 |
|||||||||||||||||
Book value per share |
45.91 |
45.20 |
41.69 |
|||||||||||||||||
Closing share price4 |
73.14 |
75.21 |
74.00 |
|||||||||||||||||
Shares outstanding (millions) |
||||||||||||||||||||
Average basic |
1,810.9 |
1,811.7 |
1,833.1 |
|||||||||||||||||
Average diluted |
1,813.6 |
1,814.5 |
1,836.2 |
|||||||||||||||||
End of period |
1,808.2 |
1,811.9 |
1,830.8 |
|||||||||||||||||
Market capitalization (billions of Canadian dollars) |
$ |
132.3 |
$ |
136.3 |
$ |
135.5 |
||||||||||||||
Dividend yield5 |
4.0 |
% |
4.0 |
% |
3.8 |
% |
||||||||||||||
Dividend payout ratio |
45.8 |
48.0 |
52.6 |
|||||||||||||||||
Price-earnings ratio |
11.1 |
12.0 |
12.3 |
|||||||||||||||||
Total shareholder return (1 year)6 |
2.8 |
7.1 |
2.6 |
|||||||||||||||||
Common share information – adjusted (Canadian dollars)1 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Per share earnings |
||||||||||||||||||||
Basic |
$ |
1.66 |
$ |
1.59 |
$ |
1.57 |
||||||||||||||
Diluted |
1.66 |
1.59 |
1.57 |
|||||||||||||||||
Dividend payout ratio |
44.6 |
% |
46.5 |
% |
42.7 |
% |
||||||||||||||
Price-earnings ratio |
10.8 |
11.2 |
11.4 |
|||||||||||||||||
Capital ratios |
||||||||||||||||||||
Common Equity Tier 1 Capital ratio |
11.7 |
% |
12.1 |
% |
12.0 |
% |
||||||||||||||
Tier 1 Capital ratio |
13.1 |
13.5 |
13.5 |
|||||||||||||||||
Total Capital ratio |
15.7 |
16.3 |
15.9 |
|||||||||||||||||
Leverage ratio |
4.0 |
4.0 |
4.1 |
1 |
Adjusted measures are non-GAAP measures. Refer to the “How the Bank Reports” section of this document for an explanation of reported and adjusted results. |
2 |
Metrics are non-GAAP financial measures. Refer to the “Return on Common Equity” and “Return on Tangible Common Equity” sections of this document for an explanation. |
3 |
Excludes acquired credit-impaired (ACI) loans. |
4 |
Toronto Stock Exchange (TSX) closing market price. |
5 |
Dividend yield is calculated as the annualized dividend per common share paid divided by daily average closing stock price in the relevant period. Dividend per common share is derived as follows: a) for the quarter – by annualizing the dividend per common share paid during the quarter; and b) for the year-to-date – by annualizing the year-to-date dividend per common share paid. |
6 |
Total shareholder return (TSR) is calculated based on share price movement and dividends reinvested over a trailing one-year period. |
HOW WE PERFORMED
How the Bank Reports
The Bank prepares its Interim Consolidated Financial Statements in accordance with IFRS, the current GAAP, and refers to results prepared in accordance with IFRS as “reported” results. The Bank also utilizes non-GAAP financial measures referred to as “adjusted” results to assess each of its businesses and to measure the Bank’s overall performance. To arrive at adjusted results, the Bank removes “items of note” from reported results. The items of note relate to items which management does not believe are indicative of underlying business performance. The Bank believes that adjusted results provide the reader with a better understanding of how management views the Bank’s performance. The items of note are disclosed in Table 3. As explained, adjusted results differ from reported results determined in accordance with IFRS. Adjusted results, items of note, and related terms used in this document are not defined terms under IFRS and, therefore, may not be comparable to similar terms used by other issuers.
The Bank’s U.S. strategic cards portfolio comprises agreements with certain U.S. retailers pursuant to which TD is the U.S. issuer of private label and co-branded consumer credit cards to their U.S. customers. Under the terms of the individual agreements, the Bank and the retailers share in the profits generated by the relevant portfolios after credit losses. Under IFRS, TD is required to present the gross amount of revenue and provisions for credit losses related to these portfolios in the Bank’s Interim Consolidated Statement of Income. At the segment level, the retailer program partners’ share of revenues and credit losses is presented in the Corporate segment, with an offsetting amount (representing the partners’ net share) recorded in Non-interest expenses, resulting in no impact to Corporate reported Net income (loss). The Net income (loss) included in the U.S. Retail segment includes only the portion of revenue and credit losses attributable to TD under the agreements.
The following table provides the operating results on a reported basis for the Bank.
TABLE 2: OPERATING RESULTS – Reported |
||||||||
(millions of Canadian dollars) |
For the three months ended |
|||||||
January 31 |
October 31 |
January 31 |
||||||
2020 |
2019 |
2019 |
||||||
Net interest income |
$ |
6,301 |
$ |
6,175 |
$ |
5,860 |
||
Non-interest income |
4,308 |
4,165 |
4,138 |
|||||
Total revenue |
10,609 |
10,340 |
9,998 |
|||||
Provision for credit losses |
919 |
891 |
850 |
|||||
Insurance claims and related expenses |
780 |
705 |
702 |
|||||
Non-interest expenses |
5,467 |
5,543 |
5,855 |
|||||
Income before income taxes and equity in net income of an |
||||||||
investment in TD Ameritrade |
3,443 |
3,201 |
2,591 |
|||||
Provision for income taxes |
659 |
646 |
503 |
|||||
Equity in net income of an investment in TD Ameritrade |
205 |
301 |
322 |
|||||
Net income – reported |
2,989 |
2,856 |
2,410 |
|||||
Preferred dividends |
67 |
68 |
60 |
|||||
Net income available to common shareholders and non-controlling |
||||||||
interests in subsidiaries |
$ |
2,922 |
$ |
2,788 |
$ |
2,350 |
||
Attributable to: |
||||||||
Common shareholders |
$ |
2,922 |
$ |
2,788 |
$ |
2,332 |
||
Non-controlling interests |
– |
– |
18 |
The following table provides a reconciliation between the Bank’s adjusted and reported results.
TABLE 3: NON-GAAP FINANCIAL MEASURES – Reconciliation of Adjusted to Reported Net Income |
|||||||
(millions of Canadian dollars) |
For the three months ended |
||||||
January 31 |
October 31 |
January 31 |
|||||
2020 |
2019 |
2019 |
|||||
Operating results – adjusted |
|||||||
Net interest income |
$ |
6,301 |
$ |
6,175 |
$ |
5,860 |
|
Non-interest income |
4,308 |
4,165 |
4,138 |
||||
Total revenue |
10,609 |
10,340 |
9,998 |
||||
Provision for credit losses |
919 |
891 |
850 |
||||
Insurance claims and related expenses |
780 |
705 |
702 |
||||
Non-interest expenses1 |
5,397 |
5,463 |
5,161 |
||||
Income before income taxes and equity in net income of an |
|||||||
investment in TD Ameritrade |
3,513 |
3,281 |
3,285 |
||||
Provision for income taxes |
670 |
660 |
678 |
||||
Equity in net income of an investment in TD Ameritrade2 |
229 |
325 |
346 |
||||
Net income – adjusted |
3,072 |
2,946 |
2,953 |
||||
Preferred dividends |
67 |
68 |
60 |
||||
Net income available to common shareholders and non-controlling |
|||||||
interests in subsidiaries – adjusted |
3,005 |
2,878 |
2,893 |
||||
Attributable to: |
|||||||
Non-controlling interests in subsidiaries, net of income taxes |
– |
– |
18 |
||||
Net income available to common shareholders – adjusted |
3,005 |
2,878 |
2,875 |
||||
Pre-tax adjustments for items of note |
|||||||
Amortization of intangibles3 |
(70) |
(74) |
(80) |
||||
Charges related to the long-term loyalty agreement with Air Canada4 |
– |
– |
(607) |
||||
Charges associated with the acquisition of Greystone5 |
(24) |
(30) |
(31) |
||||
Less: Impact of income taxes |
|||||||
Amortization of intangibles |
(11) |
(12) |
(13) |
||||
Charges related to the long-term loyalty agreement with Air Canada |
– |
– |
(161) |
||||
Charges associated with the acquisition of Greystone |
– |
(2) |
(1) |
||||
Total adjustments for items of note |
(83) |
(90) |
(543) |
||||
Net income available to common shareholders – reported |
$ |
2,922 |
$ |
2,788 |
$ |
2,332 |
1 |
Adjusted Non-interest expenses exclude the following items of note: Amortization of intangibles, as explained in footnote 3 – first quarter 2020 – $46 million, fourth quarter 2019 – $50 million, first quarter 2019 – $56 million, these amounts were reported in the Corporate segment. Charges related to the long-term loyalty agreement with Air Canada, as explained in footnote 4 – first quarter 2019 – $607 million; this amount was reported in the Canadian Retail segment. Charges associated with the acquisition of Greystone, as explained in footnote 5 – first quarter 2020 – $24 million, fourth quarter 2019 – $30 million, first quarter 2019 – $31 million; this amount was reported in the Canadian Retail segment. |
2 |
Adjusted Equity in net income of an investment in TD Ameritrade excludes the following items of note: Amortization of intangibles, as explained in footnote 3 – first quarter 2020 – $24 million, fourth quarter 2019 – $24 million, first quarter 2019 – $24 million. The earnings impact of this item was reported in the Corporate segment. |
3 |
Amortization of intangibles relates to intangibles acquired as a result of asset acquisitions and business combinations, including the after-tax amounts for amortization of intangibles relating to the Equity in net income of the investment in TD Ameritrade. Although the amortization of software and asset servicing rights are recorded in amortization of intangibles, they are not included for purposes of the items of note. |
4 |
On January 10, 2019, the Bank’s long-term loyalty program agreement with Air Canada became effective in conjunction with Air Canada completing its acquisition of Aimia Canada Inc., which operates the Aeroplan loyalty business (the “Transaction”). In connection with the Transaction, the Bank recognized an expense of $607 million ($446 million after-tax) in the Canadian Retail segment. |
5 |
On November 1, 2018, the Bank acquired Greystone Capital Management Inc., the parent company of Greystone Managed Investments Inc. (“Greystone”). The Bank incurred acquisition related charges including compensation to employee shareholders issued in common shares in respect of the purchase price, direct transaction costs, and certain other acquisition related costs. These amounts have been recorded as an adjustment to net income and were reported in the Canadian Retail segment. |
TABLE 4: RECONCILIATION OF REPORTED TO ADJUSTED EARNINGS PER SHARE (EPS)1 |
|||||||
(Canadian dollars) |
For the three months ended |
||||||
January 31 |
October 31 |
January 31 |
|||||
2020 |
2019 |
2019 |
|||||
Basic earnings per share – reported |
$ |
1.61 |
$ |
1.54 |
$ |
1.27 |
|
Adjustments for items of note2 |
0.05 |
0.05 |
0.30 |
||||
Basic earnings per share – adjusted |
$ |
1.66 |
$ |
1.59 |
$ |
1.57 |
|
Diluted earnings per share – reported |
$ |
1.61 |
$ |
1.54 |
$ |
1.27 |
|
Adjustments for items of note2 |
0.05 |
0.05 |
0.30 |
||||
Diluted earnings per share – adjusted |
$ |
1.66 |
$ |
1.59 |
$ |
1.57 |
1 |
EPS is computed by dividing net income available to common shareholders by the weighted-average number of shares outstanding during the period. |
2 |
For explanations of items of note, refer to the “Non-GAAP Financial Measures – Reconciliation of Adjusted to Reported Net Income” table in the “How We Performed” section of this document. |
Return on Common Equity
The Bank’s methodology for allocating capital to its business segments is aligned with the common equity capital requirements under Basel III. Capital allocated to the business segments is based on 10.5% Common Equity Tier 1 (CET1) Capital in fiscal 2020 and 10% in fiscal 2019.
Adjusted ROE is adjusted net income available to common shareholders as a percentage of average common equity.
Adjusted ROE is a non-GAAP financial measure as it is not a defined term under IFRS. Readers are cautioned that earnings and other measures adjusted to a basis other than IFRS do not have standardized meanings under IFRS and, therefore, may not be comparable to similar terms used by other issuers.
TABLE 5: RETURN ON COMMON EQUITY |
||||||||||
(millions of Canadian dollars, except as noted) |
For the three months ended |
|||||||||
January 31 |
October 31 |
January 31 |
||||||||
2020 |
2019 |
2019 |
||||||||
Average common equity |
$ |
81,933 |
$ |
81,286 |
$ |
75,873 |
||||
Net income available to common shareholders – reported |
2,922 |
2,788 |
2,332 |
|||||||
Items of note, net of income taxes1 |
83 |
90 |
543 |
|||||||
Net income available to common shareholders – adjusted |
3,005 |
2,878 |
2,875 |
|||||||
Return on common equity – reported |
14.2 |
% |
13.6 |
% |
12.2 |
% |
||||
Return on common equity – adjusted |
14.6 |
14.0 |
15.0 |
1 |
For explanations of items of note, refer to the “Non-GAAP Financial Measures – Reconciliation of Adjusted to Reported Net Income” table in the “How We Performed” section of this document. |
Return on Tangible Common Equity
Tangible common equity (TCE) is calculated as common shareholders’ equity less goodwill, imputed goodwill and intangibles on an investment in TD Ameritrade and other acquired intangible assets, net of related deferred tax liabilities. ROTCE is calculated as reported net income available to common shareholders after adjusting for the after‑tax amortization of acquired intangibles, which are treated as an item of note, as a percentage of average TCE. Adjusted ROTCE is calculated using reported net income available to common shareholders, adjusted for items of note, as a percentage of average TCE. Adjusted ROTCE provides a useful measure of the performance of the Bank’s income producing assets, independent of whether or not they were acquired or developed internally. TCE, ROTCE, and adjusted ROTCE are each non-GAAP financial measures and are not defined terms under IFRS. Readers are cautioned that earnings and other measures adjusted to a basis other than IFRS do not have standardized meanings under IFRS and, therefore, may not be comparable to similar terms used by other issuers.
TABLE 6: RETURN ON TANGIBLE COMMON EQUITY |
||||||||||
(millions of Canadian dollars, except as noted) |
For the three months ended |
|||||||||
January 31 |
October 31 |
January 31 |
||||||||
2020 |
2019 |
2019 |
||||||||
Average common equity |
$ |
81,933 |
$ |
81,286 |
$ |
75,873 |
||||
Average goodwill |
16,971 |
17,046 |
17,021 |
|||||||
Average imputed goodwill and intangibles on an |
||||||||||
investment in TD Ameritrade |
4,089 |
4,119 |
4,170 |
|||||||
Average other acquired intangibles1 |
564 |
613 |
676 |
|||||||
Average related deferred tax liabilities |
(261) |
(267) |
(238) |
|||||||
Average tangible common equity |
60,570 |
59,775 |
54,244 |
|||||||
Net income available to common shareholders – reported |
2,922 |
2,788 |
2,332 |
|||||||
Amortization of acquired intangibles, net of income taxes2 |
59 |
62 |
67 |
|||||||
Net income available to common shareholders after |
||||||||||
adjusting for after-tax amortization of acquired intangibles |
2,981 |
2,850 |
2,399 |
|||||||
Other items of note, net of income taxes2 |
24 |
28 |
476 |
|||||||
Net income available to common shareholders – adjusted |
$ |
3,005 |
$ |
2,878 |
$ |
2,875 |
||||
Return on tangible common equity |
19.6 |
% |
18.9 |
% |
17.5 |
% |
||||
Return on tangible common equity – adjusted |
19.7 |
19.1 |
21.0 |
1 |
Excludes intangibles relating to software and asset servicing rights. |
2 |
For explanations of items of note, refer to the “Non-GAAP Financial Measures – Reconciliation of Adjusted to Reported Net Income” table in the “How We Performed” section of this document. |
SIGNIFICANT EVENTS AND PENDING TRANSACTIONS
TD Ameritrade Holding Corporation and The Charles Schwab Corporation
On November 25, 2019, the Bank announced its support for the acquisition of TD Ameritrade, of which the Bank is a major shareholder, by The Charles Schwab Corporation, through a definitive agreement announced by those companies. The transaction is expected to close in the second half of calendar 2020, subject to all applicable closing conditions having been satisfied. Refer to the “Financial Results Overview – Significant and Subsequent Events, and Pending Transactions” section of the Bank’s 2019 MD&A for a discussion of the announced transaction.
HOW OUR BUSINESSES PERFORMED
For management reporting purposes, the Bank reports its results under three key business segments: Canadian Retail, which includes the results of the Canadian personal and commercial banking, wealth, and insurance businesses; U.S. Retail, which includes the results of the U.S. personal and business banking operations, wealth management services, and the Bank’s investment in TD Ameritrade; and Wholesale Banking. The Bank’s other activities are grouped into the Corporate segment.
Results of each business segment reflect revenue, expenses, assets, and liabilities generated by the businesses in that segment. Where applicable, the Bank measures and evaluates the performance of each segment based on adjusted results and ROE, and for those segments the Bank indicates that the measure is adjusted. For further details, refer to the “How the Bank Reports” section of this document, the “Business Focus” section in the Bank’s 2019 MD&A, and Note 29 Segmented Information of the Bank’s Consolidated Financial Statements for the year ended October 31, 2019. For information concerning the Bank’s measure of ROE, which is a non-GAAP financial measure, refer to the “How We Performed” section of this document.
PCL related to performing (Stage 1 and Stage 2) and impaired (Stage 3) financial assets, loan commitments, and financial guarantees is recorded within the respective segment.
Net interest income within Wholesale Banking is calculated on a taxable equivalent basis (TEB), which means that the value of non-taxable or tax-exempt income, including certain dividends, is adjusted to its equivalent before-tax value. Using TEB allows the Bank to measure income from all securities and loans consistently and makes for a more meaningful comparison of net interest income with similar institutions. The TEB increase to net interest income and provision for income taxes reflected in Wholesale Banking’s results are reversed in the Corporate segment. The TEB adjustment for the quarter was $38 million, compared with $21 million in the first quarter last year and $36 million in the prior quarter.
TABLE 7: CANADIAN RETAIL |
||||||||||
(millions of Canadian dollars, except as noted) |
For the three months ended |
|||||||||
January 31 |
October 31 |
January 31 |
||||||||
2020 |
2019 |
2019 |
||||||||
Net interest income |
$ |
3,167 |
$ |
3,173 |
$ |
3,044 |
||||
Non-interest income |
3,088 |
2,960 |
2,944 |
|||||||
Total revenue |
6,255 |
6,133 |
5,988 |
|||||||
Provision for credit losses – impaired |
320 |
324 |
264 |
|||||||
Provision for credit losses – performing |
71 |
76 |
46 |
|||||||
Total provision for credit losses |
391 |
400 |
310 |
|||||||
Insurance claims and related expenses |
780 |
705 |
702 |
|||||||
Non-interest expenses – reported |
2,636 |
2,637 |
3,084 |
|||||||
Non-interest expenses – adjusted1 |
2,612 |
2,607 |
2,446 |
|||||||
Provision for (recovery of) income taxes – reported |
659 |
646 |
513 |
|||||||
Provision for (recovery of) income taxes – adjusted1 |
659 |
648 |
675 |
|||||||
Net income – reported |
1,789 |
1,745 |
1,379 |
|||||||
Net income – adjusted1 |
$ |
1,813 |
$ |
1,773 |
$ |
1,855 |
||||
Selected volumes and ratios |
||||||||||
Return on common equity – reported2 |
37.1 |
% |
37.9 |
% |
31.6 |
% |
||||
Return on common equity – adjusted1,2 |
37.6 |
38.5 |
42.5 |
|||||||
Net interest margin (including on securitized assets) |
2.94 |
2.96 |
2.94 |
|||||||
Efficiency ratio – reported |
42.1 |
43.0 |
51.5 |
|||||||
Efficiency ratio – adjusted |
41.8 |
42.5 |
40.8 |
|||||||
Assets under administration (billions of Canadian dollars) |
$ |
439 |
$ |
422 |
$ |
396 |
||||
Assets under management (billions of Canadian dollars) |
365 |
353 |
332 |
|||||||
Number of Canadian retail branches |
1,088 |
1,091 |
1,099 |
|||||||
Average number of full-time equivalent staff |
41,394 |
41,650 |
39,997 |
1 |
Adjusted non-interest expenses excludes the following items of note: Charges related to the long-term loyalty agreement with Air Canada in the first quarter 2019 – $607 million ($446 million after-tax); and charges associated with the acquisition of Greystone in the first quarter 2020 – $24 million ($24 million after-tax), fourth quarter 2019 – $30 million ($28 million after-tax), first quarter 2019 – $31 million ($30 million after-tax). For explanations of items of note, refer to the “Non-GAAP Financial Measures – Reconciliation of Adjusted to Reported Net Income” table in the “How We Performed” section of this document. |
2 |
Capital allocated to the business segment was increased to 10.5% CET1 effective fiscal 2020 compared to 10% in fiscal 2019. |
Quarterly comparison – Q1 2020 vs. Q1 2019
Canadian Retail reported net income for the quarter was $1,789 million, an increase of $410 million, or 30%, compared with the first quarter last year, primarily due to charges related to the agreement with Air Canada in the prior year. On an adjusted basis, net income for the quarter was $1,813 million, a decrease of $42 million, or 2%, reflecting higher adjusted non-interest expenses, PCL, and insurance claims, partially offset by revenue growth. The reported and adjusted annualized ROE for the quarter was 37.1% and 37.6%, respectively, compared with 31.6% and 42.5%, respectively, in the first quarter last year.
Canadian Retail revenue is derived from Canadian personal and commercial banking, wealth, and insurance businesses. Revenue for the quarter was $6,255 million, an increase of $267 million, or 4%, compared with the first quarter last year.
Net interest income was $3,167 million, an increase of $123 million, or 4%, reflecting volume growth. Average loan volumes increased $19 billion, or 4%, reflecting 4% growth in personal loans and 8% growth in business loans. Average deposit volumes increased $24 billion, or 7%, reflecting 7% growth in both personal and business deposits, and an 8% increase in wealth deposits. Net interest margin was 2.94%, consistent with the first quarter last year, reflecting competitive pricing and the impact of interest expense relating to lease liabilities recorded upon adoption of IFRS 16, Leases (IFRS 16), offset by favourable balance sheet mix from growth in deposits.
Non-interest income was $3,088 million, an increase of $144 million, or 5%, reflecting higher revenues from the insurance business and higher fee-based revenue in the wealth business.
Assets under administration (AUA) were $439 billion as at January 31, 2020, an increase of $43 billion, or 11%, compared with the first quarter last year, reflecting increases in market value and new asset growth. Assets under management (AUM) were $365 billion as at January 31, 2020, an increase of $33 billion, or 10%, compared with the first quarter last year, reflecting increases in market value.
PCL was $391 million, an increase of $81 million, or 26%, compared with the first quarter last year. PCL – impaired for the quarter was $320 million, an increase of $56 million, or 21%, reflecting lower prior year provisions in commercial, higher insolvencies in consumer lending, and volume growth. PCL – performing was $71 million, an increase of $25 million, reflecting credit migration in the commercial and auto portfolios. Total PCL as an annualized percentage of credit volume was 0.36%, or an increase of 7 basis points (bps).
Insurance claims and related expenses for the quarter were $780 million, an increase of $78 million, or 11%, compared with the first quarter last year reflecting higher current year claims primarily from business growth.
Reported non-interest expenses for the quarter were $2,636 million, a decrease of $448 million, or 15%, compared with the first quarter last year, primarily due to prior year charges related to the agreement with Air Canada. On an adjusted basis, non-interest expenses were $2,612 million, an increase of $166 million, or 7%, reflecting higher spend supporting business growth, volume-driven expenses, and changes in pension costs, partially offset by a reduction in operating expense due to the adoption of IFRS 16.
The reported and adjusted efficiency ratio for the quarter was 42.1% and 41.8%, respectively, compared with 51.5% and 40.8%, respectively, in the first quarter last year.
Quarterly comparison – Q1 2020 vs. Q4 2019
Canadian Retail reported net income for the quarter increased $44 million, or 3%, compared with the prior quarter, reflecting revenue growth, partially offset by higher insurance claims. On an adjusted basis, net income increased $40 million, or 2%. The reported and adjusted annualized ROE for the quarter was 37.1% and 37.6%, respectively, compared with 37.9% and 38.5%, respectively, in the prior quarter.
Revenue increased $122 million, or 2%, compared with the prior quarter. Net interest income decreased $6 million, relatively flat compared with the prior quarter. Average loan volumes increased $4 billion, or 1%, reflecting 1% growth in both personal and business loans. Average deposit volumes increased $10 billion, or 3%, reflecting 2% growth in personal deposits, 4% in business deposits, and 5% in wealth deposits. Net interest margin was 2.94%, a decrease of 2 bps, reflecting seasonality and the impact of interest expense relating to lease liabilities recorded upon adoption of IFRS 16.
Non-interest income increased $128 million, or 4%, reflecting higher revenues from the insurance business and higher fee-based revenue in the banking and wealth businesses. The increase in non-interest income also includes $54 million related to higher fair value of investments supporting claims liabilities, which resulted in a similar increase to insurance claims.
AUA increased $17 billion, or 4%, compared with the prior quarter, reflecting increases in market value and new asset growth. AUM increased $12 billion, or 3%, reflecting increases in market value.
PCL decreased $9 million, or 2%, compared with the prior quarter. PCL – impaired decreased by $4 million. PCL – performing decreased $5 million. Total PCL as an annualized percentage of credit volume was 0.36%, or a decrease of 1 basis point.
Insurance claims and related expenses for the quarter increased $75 million, or 11%, compared with the prior quarter. The increase reflects less favourable prior years’ claims development and changes in the fair value of investments supporting claims liabilities, partially offset by lower current year claims and less severe weather-related events.
Reported non-interest expenses decreased $1 million, relatively flat, compared with the prior quarter. On an adjusted basis, non-interest expenses increased $5 million.
The reported and adjusted efficiency ratio for the quarter was 42.1% and 41.8%, respectively, compared with 43.0% and 42.5%, respectively, in the prior quarter.
TABLE 8: U.S. RETAIL |
||||||||||
(millions of dollars, except as noted) |
For the three months ended |
|||||||||
January 31 |
October 31 |
January 31 |
||||||||
Canadian Dollars |
2020 |
2019 |
2019 |
|||||||
Net interest income |
$ |
2,196 |
$ |
2,232 |
$ |
2,247 |
||||
Non-interest income |
706 |
717 |
701 |
|||||||
Total revenue |
2,902 |
2,949 |
2,948 |
|||||||
Provision for credit losses – impaired |
273 |
268 |
285 |
|||||||
Provision for credit losses – performing |
46 |
27 |
21 |
|||||||
Total provision for credit losses |
319 |
295 |
306 |
|||||||
Non-interest expenses |
1,593 |
1,669 |
1,611 |
|||||||
Provision for (recovery of) income taxes |
45 |
85 |
102 |
|||||||
U.S. Retail Bank net income |
945 |
900 |
929 |
|||||||
Equity in net income of an investment in TD Ameritrade1 |
201 |
291 |
311 |
|||||||
Net income |
$ |
1,146 |
$ |
1,191 |
$ |
1,240 |
||||
U.S. Dollars |
||||||||||
Net interest income |
$ |
1,668 |
$ |
1,687 |
$ |
1,688 |
||||
Non-interest income |
536 |
543 |
528 |
|||||||
Total revenue – reported |
2,204 |
2,230 |
2,216 |
|||||||
Provision for credit losses – impaired |
208 |
203 |
214 |
|||||||
Provision for credit losses – performing |
35 |
20 |
16 |
|||||||
Total provision for credit losses |
243 |
223 |
230 |
|||||||
Non-interest expenses |
1,210 |
1,261 |
1,209 |
|||||||
Provision for (recovery of) income taxes |
34 |
65 |
77 |
|||||||
U.S. Retail Bank net income |
717 |
681 |
700 |
|||||||
Equity in net income of an investment in TD Ameritrade1 |
152 |
219 |
235 |
|||||||
Net income |
$ |
869 |
$ |
900 |
$ |
935 |
||||
Selected volumes and ratios |
||||||||||
Return on common equity2 |
11.1 |
% |
11.8 |
% |
12.6 |
% |
||||
Net interest margin3 |
3.07 |
3.18 |
3.42 |
|||||||
Efficiency ratio |
54.9 |
56.5 |
54.6 |
|||||||
Assets under administration (billions of U.S. dollars) |
$ |
22 |
$ |
21 |
$ |
19 |
||||
Assets under management (billions of U.S. dollars) |
44 |
44 |
46 |
|||||||
Number of U.S. retail stores |
1,220 |
1,241 |
1,240 |
|||||||
Average number of full-time equivalent staff |
26,261 |
26,513 |
26,864 |
1 |
The after-tax amounts for amortization of intangibles relating to the Equity in net income of the investment in TD Ameritrade is recorded in the Corporate segment with other acquired intangibles. |
2 |
Capital allocated to the business segment was increased to 10.5% CET1 effective fiscal 2020 compared to 10% in fiscal 2019. |
3 |
Net interest margin excludes the impact related to the TD Ameritrade insured deposit accounts (IDA) and the impact of intercompany deposits and cash collateral. In addition, the value of tax-exempt interest income is adjusted to its equivalent before-tax value. |
Quarterly comparison – Q1 2020 vs. Q1 2019
U.S. Retail net income for the quarter was $1,146 million (US$869 million), a decrease of $94 million (US$66 million), or 8% (7% in U.S. dollars), compared with the first quarter last year. The annualized ROE for the quarter was 11.1%, compared with 12.6% in the first quarter last year.
U.S. Retail net income includes contributions from the U.S. Retail Bank and the Bank’s investment in TD Ameritrade. Net income for the quarter from the U.S. Retail Bank and the Bank’s investment in TD Ameritrade were $945 million (US$717 million) and $201 million (US$152 million), respectively.
The contribution from TD Ameritrade was US$152 million, a decrease of US$83 million, or 35%, compared with the first quarter last year, primarily reflecting the reduced trading commissions and higher operating expenses, partially offset by higher trading volumes.
U.S. Retail Bank net income of US$717 million for the quarter increased US$17 million, or 2%, compared with the first quarter last year, reflecting loan and deposit growth and a lower provision for income taxes, partially offset by lower deposit margins and higher PCL.
U.S. Retail Bank revenue is derived from personal and business banking, and wealth management. Revenue for the quarter was US$2,204 million, a decrease of US$12 million, or 1%, compared with the first quarter last year. Net interest income decreased US$20 million, or 1%, as lower deposit margins and the impact of interest expense relating to lease liabilities recorded upon adoption of IFRS 16 in the quarter were partially offset by growth in loan and deposit volumes. Net interest margin was 3.07%, a decrease of 35 bps, reflecting lower deposit margins, balance sheet mix, and the impact of interest expense relating to lease liabilities recorded upon adoption of IFRS 16. Non-interest income increased US$8 million, or 2%, reflecting higher personal and commercial banking volumes.
Average loan volumes increased US$8 billion, or 5%, compared with the first quarter last year reflecting growth in business and personal loans of 2% and 8%, respectively. Average deposit volumes increased US$13 billion, or 5%, reflecting 10% growth in business deposit volumes, 5% growth in personal deposit volumes, and 2% increase in sweep deposit volume from TD Ameritrade.
AUA were US$22 billion as at January 31, 2020, an increase of US$3 billion, or 16%, compared with the first quarter last year. AUM were US$44 billion as at January 31, 2020, a decrease of US$2 billion, or 4%, compared with the first quarter last year.
PCL for the quarter was US$243 million, an increase of US$13 million, or 6%, compared with the first quarter last year. PCL – impaired was US$208 million, a decrease of US$6 million, or 3%. PCL – performing was US$35 million, an increase of US$19 million, primarily reflecting higher provisions in the commercial portfolio. U.S. Retail PCL including only the Bank’s contractual portion of credit losses in the U.S. strategic cards portfolio, as an annualized percentage of credit volume was 0.59%, flat, compared with the first quarter last year.
Non-interest expenses for the quarter were US$1,210 million, an increase of US$1 million, compared with the first quarter last year, primarily reflecting higher employee-related and volume-driven expenses, partially offset by productivity savings and a reduction in operating expense reflecting the adoption of IFRS 16.
Provision for income taxes for the quarter was US$34 million, a decrease of US$43 million, or 56%, compared with the first quarter last year, primarily reflecting changes to the estimated liability for uncertain tax positions.
The efficiency ratio for the quarter was 54.9%, compared with 54.6% in the first quarter last year.
Quarterly comparison – Q1 2020 vs. Q4 2019
U.S. Retail net income of $1,146 million (US$869 million) decreased $45 million (US$31 million), or 4% (3% in U.S. dollars), compared with the prior quarter. The annualized ROE for the quarter was 11.1%, compared with 11.8% in the prior quarter.
The contribution from TD Ameritrade was US$152 million, a decrease of US$67 million, or 31%, compared with the prior quarter, primarily reflecting the reduced trading commissions, partially offset by higher trading volumes and lower operating expenses.
U.S. Retail Bank net income for the quarter was US$717 million, an increase of US$36 million or 5%, compared with prior quarter, reflecting lower expenses and a lower provision for income taxes, partially offset by lower revenue and higher PCL.
Revenue for the quarter decreased US$26 million, or 1%, compared with the prior quarter. Net interest income decreased US$19 million, or 1%, reflecting lower deposit margins and the impact of interest expense relating to lease liabilities recorded upon adoption of IFRS 16, partially offset by growth in loan and deposit volumes. Net interest margin was 3.07%, a decrease of 11 bps, primarily reflecting lower deposit margins and the impact of interest expense relating to lease liabilities recorded upon adoption of IFRS 16. Non-interest income decreased US$7 million, or 1%, compared with the prior quarter.
Average loan volumes increased US$1 billion, or 1%, compared with prior quarter, reflecting growth in personal loans of 3% and decline in business loans of 1%. Average deposit volumes increased US$8 billion, or 3%, reflecting 2% growth in both personal and business deposit volumes, respectively, and a 5% increase in sweep deposit volume from TD Ameritrade.
AUA were US$22 billion as at January 31, 2020, an increase of US$1 billion, or 4%, compared to prior quarter. AUM were US$44 billion as at January 31, 2020, relatively flat to prior quarter.
PCL for the quarter increased US$20 million, or 9%, compared with the prior quarter. PCL – impaired increased US$5 million, or 2%. PCL – performing increased US$15 million, or 75%, primarily reflecting higher provisions in the commercial portfolio. U.S. Retail PCL including only the Bank’s contractual portion of credit losses in the U.S. strategic cards portfolio, as an annualized percentage of credit volume was 0.59%, or an increase of 4 bps.
Non-interest expenses for the quarter were US$1,210 million, a decrease of US$51 million, or 4% compared with the prior quarter, primarily reflecting prior quarter restructuring charges and a reduction in operating expense reflecting the adoption of IFRS 16, partially offset by a prior quarter adjustment in post-retirement benefit costs.
Provision for income taxes for the quarter was US$34 million, a decrease of US$31 million, or 48%, compared with the prior quarter, primarily reflecting changes to the estimated liability for uncertain tax positions.
The efficiency ratio for the quarter was 54.9%, compared with 56.5% in the prior quarter.
TABLE 9: WHOLESALE BANKING |
||||||||||
(millions of Canadian dollars, except as noted) |
For the three months ended |
|||||||||
January 31 |
October 31 |
January 31 |
||||||||
2020 |
2019 |
2019 |
||||||||
Net interest income (TEB) |
$ |
357 |
$ |
278 |
$ |
173 |
||||
Non-interest income |
689 |
570 |
409 |
|||||||
Total revenue |
1,046 |
848 |
582 |
|||||||
Provision for (recovery of) credit losses – impaired |
52 |
8 |
– |
|||||||
Provision for (recovery of) credit losses – performing |
(35) |
33 |
7 |
|||||||
Total provision for (recovery of) credit losses |
17 |
41 |
7 |
|||||||
Non-interest expenses |
652 |
600 |
602 |
|||||||
Provision for (recovery of) income taxes (TEB) |
96 |
47 |
(10) |
|||||||
Net income (loss) |
$ |
281 |
$ |
160 |
$ |
(17) |
||||
Selected volumes and ratios |
||||||||||
Trading-related revenue (TEB) |
$ |
612 |
$ |
411 |
$ |
251 |
||||
Average gross lending portfolio (billions of Canadian dollars)1 |
55.1 |
52.5 |
48.9 |
|||||||
Return on common equity2 |
14.0 |
% |
8.5 |
% |
(0.9) |
% |
||||
Efficiency ratio |
62.3 |
70.8 |
103.4 |
|||||||
Average number of full-time equivalent staff |
4,517 |
4,570 |
4,478 |
1 |
Includes gross loans and bankers’ acceptances relating to Wholesale Banking, excluding letters of credit, cash collateral, credit default swaps (CDS), and allowance for credit losses. |
2 |
Capital allocated to the business segment was increased to 10.5% CET1 effective fiscal 2020 compared to 10% in fiscal 2019. |
Quarterly comparison – Q1 2020 vs. Q1 2019
Wholesale Banking net income for the quarter was $281 million, an increase in net income of $298 million, compared with net loss of $17 million in the first quarter last year, reflecting higher revenue, partially offset by higher non-interest expenses.
Wholesale Banking revenue is derived primarily from capital markets and corporate and investment banking services provided to corporate, government, and institutional clients. Wholesale Banking generates revenue from corporate lending, advisory, underwriting, sales, trading and research, client securitization, trade finance, cash management, prime services, and trade execution services. Revenue for the quarter was $1,046 million, an increase of $464 million, or 80%, compared with the first quarter last year, reflecting higher trading-related revenue and underwriting fees compared with the first quarter last year when the business experienced challenging market conditions.
PCL for the quarter was $17 million, an increase of $10 million compared with the first quarter last year. PCL – impaired was $52 million reflecting credit migration. PCL – performing decreased $42 million, reflecting migration from performing to impaired.
Non-interest expenses were $652 million, an increase of $50 million, or 8%, compared with the first quarter last year. This increase reflects higher variable compensation, securities lending fees, and underwriting costs.
Quarterly comparison – Q1 2020 vs. Q4 2019
Wholesale Banking net income for the quarter was $281 million, an increase in net income of $121 million, or 76%, compared with net income of $160 million in the prior quarter, reflecting higher revenue and lower PCL, partially offset by higher non-interest expenses.
Revenue for the quarter increased $198 million, or 23%, compared with the prior quarter, reflecting higher trading-related revenue, advisory and loan fees, and higher derivative valuation charges in the prior quarter.
PCL for the quarter decreased by $24 million, compared with the prior quarter. PCL – impaired increased by $44 million reflecting credit migration. PCL – performing decreased $68 million, reflecting migration from performing to impaired.
Non-interest expenses for the quarter increased $52 million, or 9%, compared with the prior quarter, reflecting higher securities lending fees, underwriting costs, and variable compensation, partially offset by restructuring charges in the prior quarter.
TABLE 10: CORPORATE |
||||||||
(millions of Canadian dollars) |
For the three months ended |
|||||||
January 31 |
October 31 |
January 31 |
||||||
2020 |
2019 |
2019 |
||||||
Net income (loss) – reported |
$ |
(227) |
$ |
(240) |
$ |
(192) |
||
Adjustments for items of note1 |
||||||||
Amortization of intangibles before income taxes |
70 |
74 |
80 |
|||||
Less: impact of income taxes |
11 |
12 |
13 |
|||||
Net income (loss) – adjusted |
$ |
(168) |
$ |
(178) |
$ |
(125) |
||
Decomposition of items included in net income (loss) – adjusted |
||||||||
Net corporate expenses |
$ |
(179) |
$ |
(201) |
$ |
(182) |
||
Other |
11 |
23 |
39 |
|||||
Non-controlling interests |
– |
– |
18 |
|||||
Net income (loss) – adjusted |
$ |
(168) |
$ |
(178) |
$ |
(125) |
||
Selected volumes |
||||||||
Average number of full-time equivalent staff |
17,458 |
17,316 |
16,229 |
1 |
For explanations of items of note, refer to the “Non-GAAP Financial Measures – Reconciliation of Adjusted to Reported Net Income” table in the “How We Performed” section of this document. |
Quarterly comparison – Q1 2020 vs. Q1 2019
Corporate segment’s reported net loss for the quarter was $227 million, compared with a reported net loss of $192 million in the first quarter last year. Reported net loss increased primarily reflecting lower contribution from other items and non-controlling interests. Other items decreased primarily reflecting an unfavourable adjustment relating to hedge accounting, partially offset by higher revenue from other treasury and balance sheet management activities recognized in the first quarter this year. Adjusted net loss was $168 million compared with an adjusted net loss of $125 million in the first quarter last year.
Quarterly comparison – Q1 2020 vs. Q4 2019
Corporate segment’s reported net loss for the quarter was $227 million, compared with a reported net loss of $240 million in the prior quarter. Reported net loss decreased primarily reflecting lower net corporate expenses in the current quarter, partially offset by lower contribution from other items in the current quarter. Other items decreased primarily reflecting an unfavourable adjustment relating to hedge accounting, partially offset by higher revenue from other treasury and balance sheet management activities recognized in the first quarter this year. Net corporate expenses decreased largely due to restructuring charges incurred in the prior quarter. Adjusted net loss was $168 million compared with an adjusted net loss of $178 million in the prior quarter.
SHAREHOLDER AND INVESTOR INFORMATION
Shareholder Services
If you: |
And your inquiry relates to: |
Please contact: |
Are a registered shareholder (your name |
Missing dividends, lost share certificates, estate |
Transfer Agent: AST Trust Company (Canada) Montréal, Québec H3B 3K3 1-800-387-0825 (Canada and U.S. only) or 416-682-3860 Facsimile: 1-888-249-6189 |
Hold your TD shares through the Direct Registration System in the United States |
Missing dividends, lost share certificates, estate |
Co-Transfer Agent and Registrar: Computershare Louisville, KY 40233, or Computershare 462 South 4th Street, Suite 1600 Louisville, KY 40202 1-866-233-4836 TDD for hearing impaired: 1-800-231-5469 Shareholders outside of U.S.: 201-680-6578 TDD shareholders outside of U.S.: 201-680-6610 |
Beneficially own TD shares that are held in |
Your TD shares, including questions regarding the |
Your intermediary |
For all other shareholder inquiries, please contact TD Shareholder Relations at 416-944-6367 or 1-866-756-8936 or email tdshinfo@td.com. Please note that by leaving us an e-mail or voicemail message, you are providing your consent for us to forward your inquiry to the appropriate party for response.
Normal Course Issuer Bid
On December 19, 2019, the Bank announced that the TSX and OSFI approved the Bank’s Normal Course Issuer Bid (NCIB) to repurchase for cancellation up to 30 million of the Bank’s common shares. Pursuant to the Notice of Intention filed with the TSX, the NCIB ends on December 23, 2020, such earlier date as the Bank may determine or such earlier date as the Bank may complete its purchases. A copy of the Notice may be obtained without charge by contacting TD Shareholder Relations by phone at 416-944-6367 or 1-866-756-8936 or by e-mail at tdshinfo@td.com.
Access to Quarterly Results Materials
Interested investors, the media and others may view the first quarter earnings news release, results slides, supplementary financial information, and the Report to Shareholders on the TD Investor Relations website at www.td.com/investor.
Quarterly Earnings Conference Call
TD Bank Group will host an earnings conference call in Toronto, Ontario on February 27, 2020. The call will be audio webcast live through TD’s website at 2:00 p.m. ET. The call and audio webcast will feature presentations by TD executives on the Bank’s financial results for the first quarter, discussions of related disclosures, and will be followed by a question-and-answer period with analysts. The presentation material referenced during the call will be available on the TD website at www.td.com/investor on February 27, 2020, by approximately 12:00 p.m. ET. A listen-only telephone line is available at 416‑641‑6150 or 1-866-696-5894 (toll free) and the passcode is 2727354.
The audio webcast and presentations will be archived at www.td.com/investor. Replay of the teleconference will be available from 5:00 p.m. ET on February 27, 2020, until 11:59 p.m. ET on March 6, 2020, by calling 905-694-9451 or 1-800-408-3053 (toll free). The passcode is 3336790.
Fintech
Fintech Pulse: Your Daily Industry Brief – April 4, 2025: Maseera, Adva, Plaid, Navi

In today’s ever-evolving fintech landscape, innovation is not merely a buzzword—it is the lifeblood of a dynamic industry that continuously reshapes global finance. This edition of Fintech Pulse: Your Daily Industry Brief examines the latest pivotal developments that are driving change and fostering new opportunities across financial technology sectors. From strategic acquisitions and regulatory shifts in the buy-now-pay-later (BNPL) sphere to significant funding rounds and data-driven market analyses, the fintech narrative is bursting with energy and potential. In this op-ed-style briefing, we explore how companies like Maseera, Adva, Plaid, and Navi are not only navigating but actively defining the contours of the future of finance.
Our coverage today is rooted in a blend of hard news and informed analysis, as we delve into critical developments reported by renowned sources across the fintech spectrum. Each segment of this article has been meticulously curated and analyzed to provide you with a clear perspective on where the industry stands and where it might be headed. As you read on, you’ll discover insights into strategic expansions, regulatory reforms, and investment trends that are set to shape the fintech environment in the months to come.
Breaking News: Maseera’s Strategic Acquisition of Adva in Egypt
In a significant move aimed at bolstering its regional presence, Maseera’s recent acquisition of Adva marks a major milestone in the expansion of fintech services in Egypt. The acquisition, reported by Tech African News (Source: Tech African News), is poised to redefine how digital financial solutions are deployed in emerging markets.
A New Chapter in Fintech Expansion
Maseera, a recognized name in the fintech arena, has long been at the forefront of digital transformation in finance. With this acquisition, the company not only secures a stronger foothold in Egypt’s burgeoning market but also signals its intent to broaden its portfolio of fintech solutions. The deal is expected to unlock new synergies between Maseera’s technology-driven approach and Adva’s established customer base and operational expertise.
The significance of this acquisition cannot be overstated. In emerging markets, where traditional banking infrastructures often lag behind technological advances, strategic partnerships and acquisitions like this one enable companies to leapfrog legacy systems. By integrating Adva’s services into its own ecosystem, Maseera is poised to offer a seamless, more efficient financial experience to millions of users who are eager for modern digital banking solutions.
Market Impact and Strategic Implications
From an investor’s perspective, the acquisition highlights the potential for exponential growth within the fintech sector, particularly in regions that are ripe for digital disruption. The move is expected to enhance Maseera’s competitive edge, enabling it to offer a broader suite of financial services that cater to both consumer and business needs. Moreover, this deal exemplifies the increasing trend of cross-border investments and strategic consolidations that are redefining the competitive landscape in fintech.
Financial analysts suggest that such strategic moves are critical in a sector where speed and innovation dictate market success. With regulatory frameworks in many emerging economies still in their nascent stages, the agility of fintech firms like Maseera provides them with a unique advantage. The integration of Adva’s operational prowess is likely to streamline processes and introduce innovative products that could significantly disrupt traditional banking paradigms.
Broader Economic and Social Implications
Beyond the immediate business implications, Maseera’s acquisition of Adva holds broader economic significance. As digital financial services become increasingly accessible, they play a pivotal role in driving financial inclusion. For a country like Egypt, which has a significant portion of its population still underbanked, the introduction of advanced fintech solutions can be transformative. It is anticipated that this move will not only boost economic growth but also foster greater transparency and efficiency in financial transactions, ultimately empowering individuals and businesses alike.
Navigating Regulatory Waters: The Future of BNPL in Asia
Regulatory oversight continues to be a critical component in the evolution of fintech, particularly in emerging sectors like BNPL. An insightful piece from Fintech News Singapore (Source: Fintech News Singapore) examines the challenges and opportunities that lie ahead for BNPL services in Asia.
The Rise of BNPL and Its Regulatory Challenges
BNPL has rapidly gained traction as a convenient payment method, particularly among younger consumers who favor flexibility over traditional credit lines. However, this rapid adoption has not come without its share of regulatory scrutiny. Policymakers in Asia are increasingly aware of the potential risks associated with BNPL, such as over-indebtedness and lack of consumer protection. As such, regulators are now tasked with striking a balance between fostering innovation and ensuring robust consumer safeguards.
The report emphasizes that the road ahead for BNPL regulation in Asia is complex. Authorities must navigate a landscape that is marked by diverse economic conditions and varying levels of regulatory maturity across different countries. The challenge lies in developing a framework that is both flexible enough to accommodate innovative business models and stringent enough to prevent systemic risks.
Impact on Fintech Companies and Consumers
For fintech companies operating in the BNPL space, the evolving regulatory environment represents both a challenge and an opportunity. On one hand, stricter regulations could potentially slow down the rapid expansion of BNPL services. On the other, a clear regulatory framework could help legitimize the sector, attract more institutional investors, and build greater consumer trust.
From an op-ed perspective, it is crucial to recognize that the proactive steps taken by regulators may ultimately serve to strengthen the fintech ecosystem. Clear guidelines can spur innovation by providing a stable operating environment, thereby reducing uncertainties that often deter investment. Additionally, enhanced consumer protection measures are likely to encourage more widespread adoption, as users gain confidence in the reliability and fairness of BNPL services.
Strategic Recommendations for Industry Players
Industry stakeholders are advised to engage proactively with regulators, contributing their insights to shape a balanced framework that supports both growth and consumer welfare. Fintech companies should invest in robust risk management systems and develop innovative compliance solutions to stay ahead of regulatory changes. Moreover, collaboration with financial institutions and technology partners will be crucial in navigating this evolving landscape successfully.
Plaid’s Robust Funding: Catalyzing Innovation in Digital Finance
In a display of strong market confidence, fintech firm Plaid recently secured a significant round of funding, a development that was detailed by Retail Banker International (Source: Retail Banker International). This funding milestone is not just a financial boost—it is a validation of Plaid’s strategic vision and its critical role in powering digital financial solutions.
The Funding Milestone and Its Significance
Plaid’s successful funding round reflects the broader trend of increased investment in fintech innovations that are transforming the financial services industry. The capital infusion is set to accelerate the company’s development of cutting-edge solutions, enabling it to expand its product offerings and enhance its technological infrastructure. For Plaid, this means a faster rollout of new features that will further streamline the integration of financial data into consumer and business applications.
Investors have shown considerable confidence in Plaid’s ability to navigate a competitive market by continually innovating and adapting to emerging trends. The funding round is indicative of the growing recognition that fintech platforms like Plaid are not merely technology providers, but pivotal enablers of financial inclusion and efficiency. The company’s focus on developing secure, scalable, and user-friendly products aligns perfectly with the evolving needs of modern financial consumers.
Strategic Implications for the Fintech Ecosystem
Plaid’s robust funding serves as a bellwether for the fintech industry, underscoring the importance of investment in technological innovation. With the influx of capital, Plaid is well-positioned to leverage emerging opportunities in areas such as open banking, digital identity verification, and data analytics. This strategic move is likely to have a ripple effect across the fintech ecosystem, inspiring other companies to accelerate their own innovation efforts.
From a broader perspective, the funding success of Plaid highlights the critical role that data integration plays in the digital finance landscape. In an era where data is a key asset, platforms that can seamlessly connect disparate financial systems and provide real-time insights will undoubtedly emerge as leaders in the industry. The funding round is a testament to the value that investors place on companies capable of delivering innovative, data-driven solutions that address the complex needs of today’s financial landscape.
Investor and Consumer Perspectives
For investors, Plaid’s funding round represents a compelling opportunity to capitalize on the rapid growth of digital finance. The company’s strategic vision and its ability to consistently deliver innovative products have positioned it as a standout performer in a crowded market. Meanwhile, consumers stand to benefit from enhanced digital banking experiences that are more secure, efficient, and tailored to their needs.
In this op-ed analysis, it is worth noting that the infusion of capital into fintech firms like Plaid is a harbinger of a more interconnected and data-driven financial future. As these companies continue to push the boundaries of what is possible, they are not only driving market growth but also setting the stage for a new era of financial empowerment.
Q1 Data Analysis: Unveiling Market Trends in Fintech
Data analytics remains one of the most powerful tools in the fintech arsenal. An in-depth analysis of Q1 data, as reported by Sifted (Source: Sifted), provides invaluable insights into the trends that are shaping the fintech landscape. This data-driven approach is critical for understanding market dynamics, forecasting future trends, and making informed strategic decisions.
Key Insights from Q1 Data
The Q1 analysis reveals several noteworthy trends that are influencing the direction of the fintech industry. Among the most significant findings is the rapid pace of digital adoption, particularly in the realm of mobile banking and digital payments. Consumers are increasingly relying on fintech solutions for everyday financial transactions, driven by the convenience and security that these platforms offer.
Furthermore, the data underscores the importance of personalized financial services. As fintech companies harness the power of big data and machine learning, they are better equipped to tailor their offerings to meet the specific needs of individual consumers. This trend towards personalization is not only enhancing customer satisfaction but also driving customer loyalty, as users increasingly expect financial services that are both innovative and user-centric.
Implications for Fintech Companies
For fintech companies, the insights gleaned from Q1 data are invaluable. They highlight the areas where consumer demand is strongest and where investments in technology can yield the highest returns. Companies that can effectively leverage data to anticipate consumer needs and streamline their operations will undoubtedly gain a competitive advantage in the market.
From an op-ed perspective, this data analysis serves as a call to action for fintech leaders. In a rapidly evolving landscape, the ability to harness data and derive actionable insights is a key differentiator. As fintech firms continue to refine their strategies based on data-driven insights, we can expect to see even more innovative products and services that are tailored to the evolving needs of a digital-savvy consumer base.
Broader Market Implications
The Q1 data analysis also provides a broader perspective on the overall health of the fintech industry. It suggests that, despite occasional market fluctuations, the long-term trajectory of digital finance remains robust. The continuous growth in user adoption, coupled with increased investments in technology and innovation, paints a promising picture for the future of fintech.
Moreover, the insights from this analysis have significant implications for policymakers and regulators. As the fintech ecosystem expands, it is crucial for regulatory frameworks to evolve in tandem, ensuring that they support innovation while safeguarding consumer interests. This delicate balance between innovation and regulation is a recurring theme in the fintech narrative, and the Q1 data analysis underscores its importance in shaping a resilient and forward-looking industry.
The Role of Regulators: Insights from Navi’s Perspective
In a candid commentary on the role of regulatory bodies, Navi’s founder, Sachin Bansal, recently shared his perspective on how regulators serve as pivotal stakeholders for fintech companies. This insight was featured on TradingView (Source: TradingView), where Bansal emphasized that “for a fintech, the regulator is its most important stakeholder.”
Understanding the Regulatory Mandate
Bansal’s remarks underscore the complex interplay between innovation and regulation. While fintech companies are celebrated for their disruptive potential and technological prowess, they also operate within a framework that requires strict adherence to regulatory standards. The delicate balance between pushing technological boundaries and complying with regulatory mandates is a recurring challenge for fintech firms.
From an analytical standpoint, Bansal’s perspective invites us to rethink the conventional narrative around regulation. Rather than viewing regulatory oversight as a hindrance to innovation, it can be seen as a necessary partner in ensuring that fintech growth is sustainable, secure, and ultimately beneficial to consumers. Regulatory bodies provide a critical check on potential excesses and help maintain market stability, thereby laying the groundwork for long-term industry success.
Strategic Benefits of Regulatory Collaboration
For fintech companies, forging a collaborative relationship with regulators is not just advisable—it is imperative. Companies that proactively engage with regulatory bodies are better positioned to influence policy development, secure favorable regulatory conditions, and ultimately, drive innovation in a responsible manner. Navi’s emphasis on the regulator as a key stakeholder highlights the need for fintech firms to view regulatory engagement as an integral part of their strategic planning.
In our opinion, the ability to navigate regulatory frameworks effectively is one of the most significant challenges facing fintech companies today. However, those that manage to do so can turn regulatory constraints into competitive advantages by building trust with consumers, enhancing operational resilience, and paving the way for sustained growth.
Looking Ahead: Regulatory Trends and Industry Evolution
As the fintech industry matures, we can expect to see continued evolution in regulatory approaches. Emerging technologies such as blockchain, artificial intelligence, and biometric authentication are prompting regulators to rethink traditional frameworks and develop innovative solutions that address the unique challenges posed by digital finance. This dynamic regulatory environment is both a challenge and an opportunity—a duality that industry leaders must navigate with agility and foresight.
Navi’s insights serve as a timely reminder that successful fintech companies must be as adept at regulatory navigation as they are at technological innovation. The future of fintech depends on a collaborative effort between innovators and regulators to create an ecosystem that is secure, transparent, and conducive to sustained growth.
Synthesis and Strategic Outlook: Fintech in the Global Arena
As we synthesize the insights from today’s top fintech stories, several common themes emerge. Innovation, strategic expansion, regulatory engagement, and data-driven decision-making are not isolated trends—they are interwoven elements that collectively define the modern fintech landscape. In our view, the interplay between these factors is shaping a future where digital financial services become increasingly sophisticated, accessible, and integral to everyday life.
Consolidation and Expansion in Emerging Markets
Maseera’s acquisition of Adva is a prime example of how strategic consolidations are driving fintech growth in emerging markets. By combining forces, companies can accelerate innovation, expand their reach, and deliver more comprehensive financial services to underserved populations. This model of strategic expansion is likely to be replicated in other regions, signaling a broader trend toward consolidation that will reshape competitive dynamics in global fintech.
The Dual Edge of Regulatory Oversight
Regulation in fintech is a double-edged sword. While the imposition of regulatory frameworks can sometimes slow down innovation, clear and forward-thinking regulatory policies are essential for ensuring long-term market stability and consumer protection. As evidenced by the discussions surrounding BNPL services in Asia and Navi’s regulatory insights, the future success of fintech hinges on finding a harmonious balance between fostering innovation and maintaining robust oversight.
The Power of Data-Driven Strategies
Data analytics is emerging as a cornerstone of fintech strategy. The insights derived from Q1 data analysis not only validate current trends but also provide a roadmap for future innovation. Companies that can harness the power of data to optimize their products, enhance user experiences, and streamline operations will lead the way in the next phase of digital finance evolution.
Investment and Capital Flow
Plaid’s recent funding round is a testament to the unwavering investor confidence in fintech innovation. Capital investments in fintech are accelerating the development of new technologies, driving competitive dynamics, and ultimately delivering better financial services to consumers worldwide. This influx of funding is instrumental in pushing the boundaries of what is possible in digital finance.
Analyzing the Broader Implications for the Fintech Ecosystem
As fintech continues to disrupt traditional financial systems, it is important to contextualize these developments within the broader economic, technological, and social landscape.
Economic Empowerment and Financial Inclusion
At its core, fintech is about democratizing access to financial services. Strategic moves like Maseera’s acquisition and Plaid’s funding highlight the potential for digital platforms to bridge gaps in financial inclusion, particularly in regions where conventional banking services have historically fallen short. By providing innovative solutions that are both accessible and user-friendly, fintech companies are empowering individuals and businesses to participate more fully in the digital economy.
Technological Disruption and Consumer Behavior
The rapid pace of technological innovation in fintech is reshaping consumer expectations. As users become accustomed to the seamless, on-demand services offered by digital platforms, traditional banks are being forced to adapt or risk obsolescence. The trends discussed in today’s briefing, from BNPL regulation to data analytics, underscore a broader shift toward consumer-centric financial services that prioritize efficiency, transparency, and personalization.
The Role of Strategic Leadership
In an industry marked by rapid change and intense competition, visionary leadership is essential. Companies that can anticipate market trends, navigate regulatory complexities, and drive technological innovation will emerge as the leaders of tomorrow. The examples discussed in today’s briefing—whether it’s Maseera’s bold acquisition strategy or Plaid’s ability to secure significant funding—serve as powerful case studies in strategic leadership within the fintech sector.
Global Collaboration and Cross-Border Innovation
The fintech landscape is inherently global, and today’s developments reflect the interconnected nature of digital finance. Cross-border partnerships and investments are becoming the norm, as companies seek to leverage international expertise and expand their reach. This global perspective is crucial for understanding how local innovations can have far-reaching impacts, influencing market dynamics and regulatory practices worldwide.
In-Depth Commentary: Navigating the Fintech Revolution
As we move further into 2025, the fintech revolution is gathering unprecedented momentum. The stories we have explored today are not isolated incidents but rather interconnected threads in a larger tapestry of digital transformation.
The Convergence of Technology and Finance
At the heart of the fintech revolution is the convergence of advanced technologies—such as artificial intelligence, blockchain, and big data—with traditional financial services. This convergence is creating new business models that challenge the status quo and offer consumers unprecedented levels of convenience and security. The recent developments we have covered illustrate this phenomenon vividly. Whether it is through strategic acquisitions, innovative funding strategies, or data-driven insights, fintech companies are reimagining the future of finance with each passing day.
A Call to Innovate and Collaborate
For industry insiders, the message is clear: innovation must be paired with collaboration. Fintech companies that work closely with regulators, technology partners, and even competitors are better positioned to drive sustainable growth. This collaborative spirit is not just a strategic imperative—it is the only viable path forward in a landscape that is as dynamic as it is competitive.
Reflecting on the Journey So Far
Looking back at the evolution of fintech over the past few years, one cannot help but marvel at the speed and scale of change. The rapid digital transformation witnessed across global markets is a testament to the relentless pursuit of innovation. However, as we celebrate these advancements, it is equally important to remain vigilant about the challenges that lie ahead, particularly in areas related to cybersecurity, consumer protection, and regulatory compliance.
Balancing Optimism with Prudence
In our opinion, the future of fintech is both bright and complex. While the opportunities are immense, so too are the challenges. Navigating this landscape requires a balanced approach—one that is marked by optimism, but also by a realistic appraisal of the risks and obstacles. As fintech continues to push the boundaries of what is possible, it is incumbent upon industry leaders to ensure that innovation does not come at the expense of security or consumer trust.
The Imperative of Continuous Learning
One of the most compelling lessons from today’s developments is the importance of continuous learning and adaptation. The fintech sector is characterized by rapid change, and what worked yesterday may not necessarily be effective tomorrow. As new technologies emerge and consumer behaviors evolve, staying informed and agile is the key to long-term success. This op-ed-style analysis is intended not only to inform but also to inspire a proactive approach to learning and adaptation within the fintech community.
Conclusion: The Future of Fintech and the Road Ahead
In conclusion, today’s briefing has provided a comprehensive look at some of the most important developments in the fintech industry. From Maseera’s bold acquisition of Adva in Egypt and the evolving regulatory landscape for BNPL in Asia to Plaid’s significant funding round and the illuminating Q1 data analysis, each story underscores the dynamic and multifaceted nature of digital finance today.
Key Takeaways
-
Strategic Expansion: Maseera’s acquisition of Adva is a powerful example of how strategic consolidation can accelerate market penetration in emerging economies, fostering financial inclusion and innovation.
-
Regulatory Evolution: The ongoing discussions around BNPL regulation in Asia highlight the need for a balanced approach that supports innovation while protecting consumers. Regulatory bodies are emerging as key partners in the fintech ecosystem.
-
Investment and Innovation: Plaid’s successful funding round is a clear signal that the market has strong confidence in the fintech revolution. Continued investments in digital finance are expected to drive further technological advancements and market growth.
-
Data-Driven Insights: The Q1 data analysis provides valuable insights into consumer trends and market dynamics, underscoring the importance of leveraging data to drive strategic decision-making in fintech.
-
The Role of Regulators: Navi’s emphasis on regulators as vital stakeholders reinforces the need for fintech companies to work closely with regulatory bodies to ensure sustainable, secure growth.
The Broader Vision
As we look ahead, it is evident that the fintech revolution is far from reaching its zenith. The convergence of technology, strategic investments, regulatory evolution, and data-driven insights is setting the stage for a future where digital financial services become increasingly integral to everyday life. Companies like Maseera, Plaid, and innovators like Navi are leading the charge, paving the way for a more inclusive, efficient, and dynamic financial ecosystem.
A Call to Action
For industry leaders, investors, and policymakers, today’s developments offer both inspiration and a roadmap for the future. The challenges are significant, but so too are the opportunities. By embracing innovation, fostering collaboration, and remaining steadfast in the pursuit of excellence, the fintech community can drive meaningful change that benefits not only the industry but society at large.
In this fast-paced era of digital transformation, staying ahead of the curve is essential. As we continue to witness rapid advancements and market shifts, the need for continuous learning, agile adaptation, and strategic foresight has never been more critical. The future of fintech is bright, but it will require a concerted effort from all stakeholders to navigate the complex, ever-changing landscape.
Final Thoughts
In wrapping up this comprehensive briefing, it is worth reiterating that the stories and trends discussed today are not isolated—they are part of a broader narrative of digital transformation. The fintech industry stands at the intersection of technology, finance, and innovation, and it is this convergence that promises to unlock unprecedented opportunities in the years to come. As we embrace this future, let us remain committed to the principles of innovation, collaboration, and responsible growth.
Thank you for joining us on this deep dive into the latest fintech developments. We look forward to bringing you more insightful analyses and op-ed-driven commentary as the fintech landscape continues to evolve.
The post Fintech Pulse: Your Daily Industry Brief – April 4, 2025: Maseera, Adva, Plaid, Navi appeared first on News, Events, Advertising Options.
Fintech PR
ANDURAND CAPITAL CEASES TO RELY ON ALTERNATIVE MONTHLY REPORTING SYSTEM; URGES SPROTT TO FIX SPROTT COPPER VEHICLE

The Units of Sprott Physical Copper Trust Trade at a Significant Discount to the Net Asset Value Per Unit with Inadequate Liquidity
Andurand Capital Ceases To Rely on the Alternative Monthly Reporting System in Respect of Sprott Physical Copper Trust
ST. JULIENS, Malta, April 4, 2025 /PRNewswire/ —
- Andurand Capital Management Ltd (“ACML“) believes that certain amendments to the Amended and Restated Trust Agreement of the Issuer, in particular to expand the restrictive redemption feature of the units of the Issuer (“Units”) consistent with the redemption features of other physical metals trusts managed by Sprott Asset Management LP, will help facilitate alignment between the price of the Units and the market price of physical copper.
- ACML believes that this will assist in addressing the underperformance of the Units, which trade at a significant discount to the net asset value per Unit and physical copper prices: as of market close on March 31, 2025, the price of each Unit traded at an average discount of ~18% to the net asset value per Unit over the preceding 30 trading days.
- The inception-to-date average traded value of the Units is <$200,000 per day, demonstrating the illiquidity of the Units for early investors.
MORE INFORMATION:
ACML, in its capacity as discretionary investment manager for Andurand Climate and Energy Transition Master Fund (the “Fund“), announces that it has elected to voluntarily cease filing reports under the Alternative Monthly Reporting System (“AMR System“) under Part 4 of National Instrument 62-103 – The Early Warning System and Related Take-Over Bid and Insider Reporting Issues (“NI 62-103“) in respect of Sprott Physical Copper Trust (the “Issuer“).
Immediately before and immediately after ACML elected to voluntarily cease filing reports under the AMR System on the date hereof, ACML, on behalf and for the sole benefit of the Fund, exercised control and direction over an aggregate 1,811,957 Units, representing approximately 16.4% of the issued and outstanding Units.
The Units described herein were acquired and partly redeemed in the ordinary course of business for the Fund’s investment purposes only and not for the purpose of exercising control or direction over the Issuer. ACML, on behalf and for the sole benefit of the Fund, may further purchase, hold, vote, trade, dispose or otherwise deal in Units or other securities of the Issuer in such manner as it deems advisable, including, without limitation, in order to benefit from changes in market prices of the Units, publicly disclosed changes in the operations of the Issuer, its business strategy or prospects, or from a sale or merger of the Issuer.
ACML may in the future determine to take any available course of action to address the foregoing concern or otherwise, which could involve one or more of the types of transactions or matters, or have one or more of the results, referred to in clauses (a) through (k) of item 5 of the report that ACML, on behalf of the Fund, will shortly file on Form 62-103F2 – Required Disclosure by an Eligible Institutional Investor under Section 4.3 in connection with this press release and in accordance with applicable securities laws (the “Report“), including requisitioning a meeting of unitholders of the Issuer, engaging with unitholders of the Issuer and soliciting proxies, or otherwise.
ACML’s registered office is located at The Hedge Business Centre, Level 5, Ir-Rampa ta’ San Giljan, Balluta Bay, St. Julian’s STJ 1062, Malta.
For further information or to receive a copy of the Report, please see the Issuer’s profile on SEDAR+ at www.sedarplus.ca, or contact ACML by phone at +356 2092 7400, Hakon Haugnes, or by email at contact@andurandcapital.com.
View original content:https://www.prnewswire.co.uk/news-releases/andurand-capital-ceases-to-rely-on-alternative-monthly-reporting-system-urges-sprott-to-fix-sprott-copper-vehicle-302421017.html
Fintech PR
BizClik Media Launches April Editions of Supply Chain Digital and Procurement Magazine

The April editions feature interviews with leading executives from PepsiCo, BMW Group, DP World, Exotec, Royal Mail, Coupa Software and more, offering insights into supply chain innovation, procurement transformation, and global logistics strategies.
LONDON, April 4, 2025 /PRNewswire/ — BizClik, the UK’s fastest-growing B2B digital media and publishing company, has released the April 2025 editions of Supply Chain Digital and Procurement Magazine. These titles remain essential reading for professionals across the global supply chain, logistics, and procurement industries, offering forward-looking features, in-depth interviews, and exclusive event coverage.
This edition’s lead interview features Rashid Abdulla, CEO for Europe at DP World, who shares how the company is driving supply chain transformation across the continent.
Other highlights include:
- Lauren Hymen, PepsiCo – On how digital transformation is empowering procurement
- Milan Nedeljkovic, BMW Group – Exploring the impact of Industry 4.0 on manufacturing
- Charles Hou, J&T Express Middle East – On revolutionising last-mile delivery
- Romain Moulin & Arthur Bellamy, Exotec – Discussing robotics, AI, and future-ready automation
- Mary Rollman, KPMG US – Analysing nearshoring strategies to navigate trade uncertainty
- Pierre-Yves Dermagne – On entering a new era of supplier diversity and compliance
- Top 10 Supply Chain Leaders – Featuring standout figures including Carol B. Tomé at UPS
- People Moves – Updates on Fernando Fernandez, Torsten Pilz, Gavin Chappell, and Adam Jones
This issue also includes highlights from Procurement & Supply Chain LIVE: Sustainability and previews of the upcoming shows in Chicago and London.
The April edition features a cover story with Lauren Hymen of PepsiCo, who shares how the company is leveraging digital tools to drive innovation and meet its sustainability goals.
Key content includes:
- Stuart Farrell & Natalia Merkulova, AllPoints Fibre Networks – On aligning procurement and finance for value creation
- Joao Paulo da Silva, Coupa Software – On leading digital transformation initiatives
- Ernest Rolfson, Finexio – Executive perspective on payment innovation
- Kristian O’Meara, JAGGAER – Exploring AI’s impact on supply chain visibility
- Top 10 Influential CPOs – Including Heather Ostis, Thomas Udesen, Amanda Davies, and more
- People Moves – Career updates from David Khuat-Duy, Franck Lheureux, James Jones and Willem Uijen
- Supplier Diversity – Insights from Kelly Grainger, Felizitas Lichtenberg and Rebecca Simpson
- Blockchain – Expert commentary from Scott Zoldi at FICO and Cristiano Ventricelli at Moody’s Ratings
Also featured: Highlights from Procurement & Supply Chain LIVE: Sustainability, and what to expect at upcoming events in Dubai and Chicago.
About BizClik
BizClik is one of the fastest-growing digital media companies in the UK, host to a growing portfolio of industry-leading global brands and communities.
BizClik’s expanding portfolio includes Technology, AI, FinTech, InsurTech, Supply Chain, Procurement, Energy, Mining, Manufacturing, Healthcare, Mobile, Data Centre, Cyber, and Sustainability.
For more information, please visit https://www.bizclikmedia.com/
View original content:https://www.prnewswire.co.uk/news-releases/bizclik-media-launches-april-editions-of-supply-chain-digital-and-procurement-magazine-302420939.html
-
Fintech7 days ago
Fintech Pulse: Your Daily Industry Brief – March 27, 2025 | Almond Fintech, Maplerad & More
-
Fintech PR6 days ago
BRI Holds 2025 Annual General Meeting of Shareholders (AGMS), Distributes IDR 51.73 Trillion in Dividends and Prepares for IDR 3 Trillion Buyback
-
Fintech4 days ago
Fintech Pulse: Your Daily Industry Brief – March 29, 2025 Featuring: Charlie Javice, Rabobank, Mollie, Ivy, Barclays, and more
-
Fintech2 days ago
Fintech Pulse: Your Daily Industry Brief – April 2, 2025 | Featuring Citi, Insigneo, Luma Financial Technologies, Weefin, Tirana Bank, Backbase
-
Fintech PR2 days ago
Abeille Assurances Relies on Location Intelligence and Data Enrichment from Precisely to Manage Climate Risks and Enhance Customer Experience
-
Fintech3 days ago
Fintech Pulse: Your Daily Industry Brief – April 1, 2025 Featuring: Neobanks, Fintech Innovators, Spendr, Financial Finesses, Elga Credit Union, Pocketnest
-
Fintech PR1 day ago
KuCoin Surpasses 40 Million Registered Users, Demonstrating Commitment to Compliance and Innovation
-
Fintech PR4 days ago
Precisely Acquires DTS Software, Adding Mainframe Storage Optimization Software to Data Integrity Portfolio