Connect with us
MARE BALTICUM Gaming & TECH Summit 2024

Fintech

OCIM: Prepayment Financing, a Mutually Beneficial Arrangement…Under Certain Conditions

Published

on

Toronto, Ontario–(Newsfile Corp. – June 8, 2022) – OCIM: Mining is a unique industry in many ways. For one thing, it is highly capital intensive, requiring heavy investment and a significant amount of cash to operate on a daily basis. It also entails a set very distinct operating cycles, each phase of which has its own specific economic and financial challenges. Upstream, juniors must explore and study the potential of a mine without any guarantee of future production flows. This is the time for IPOs and successive capital increases, as the outline of the projects comes into focus. In contrast, the mass production and industrialisation phase occur when the mines are mature, the flows are known, and the infrastructure needed has been financed. At this stage, producers are able to provide banks with the necessary guarantees to obtain credit. The nature of the financing is logically consistent with this pattern: the more structured and developed the mining project is, the better the visibility of its future revenue streams and the less dilutive the financing.

There remains an intermediate phase between these two extremes, during which the exploration risks and technical hazards are sufficiently controlled to dispense with risk redistribution (and thus avoid dilution), but still too high to offer banks the many guarantees they require. This is the period of infrastructure deployment and production launch. So-called ‘alternative’ private financing makes it possible to address this critical phase. These come in several flavours. However, while these several possibilities may all be available to mining companies, they are by no means equal. Above all, they do not all offer a mining company the same peace of mind, far from it.

Royalty financing offers the mining company financing in exchange for a proportion of the turnover or operating profit to be generated by the mining project in the future. While the financial charges are adjustable and the balance sheet remains undiluted, the company’s liability continues throughout the life of the mine. Moreover, such a mechanism makes it impossible to determine the cost of capital ex ante; financing costs can be estimated only with great difficulty and after the fact. The same constraints apply to streaming, which permanently earmarks for the creditor a predefined portion of a mine’s future production, at a price well below market rates, in return for the initial financing.

To these perpetual burdens, there exists an alternative: prepayment. The creditor typically advances funds in exchange for later repayment in commodity produced by the mine. There are two possible scenarios. Either the repayment is made in the form of deliveries of commodity, whose quantity is calculated according to a fixed amount of currency (generally US dollars), or as regular deliveries of a fixed quantity of the underlying commodity of the project. For the mining company, the differences between these two options are critical.

Let us assume that the raw materials prices depreciate between the time the financing is granted and when it is actually repaid. According to the first arrangement, the mining company must produce more to repay its financing. The capture of an increasing share of production in turn weakens the economic equation of the mining company and hampers its ability to finance its development. In extreme cases, as in the event of default, guarantees are called, and the operator may lose all its assets to its creditor. This risk is far from theoretical, as dramatic examples from the past attest.

By definition, a repayment comprising the delivery of a predefined and fixed volume of commodity protects the mining company from this risk. Depreciation in the price of the underlying material has no impact on the quantity to be delivered to its creditor, which in this case is both the operator’s financier and its first buyer. It is the creditor, and no one else, who bears the risk of a fall in the price of the commodity. At most, the mining company assumes an opportunity cost if the price goes up. But at no point, whatever the price trend, is its survival or control of its assets at stake, provided of course, that it respects the schedule agreed to with its creditor.

On the express condition that it be repaid in the form of a predefined and fixed volume of commodity, prepayment financing offers further advantages. The repayment schedule is staggered according to production forecasts, allowing the operator to secure their cash flows and therefore the ability to continue operating. In addition to being non-dilutive, it is also less burdensome to set up and less intrusive. Designed with a short lifespan, it does not commit the parties beyond the transaction. Once the initial audits have been carried out and following a successful initial prepayment, new tranches can be set up easily as desired, taking into account the realities of production and the updated price of underlying raw materials. This is a way for the mining company to ensure that its financing is truly in line with its current economic situation. Unlike a predatory agreement, this type of financing gives the mining company a great deal of leeway to control its balance sheet and concentrate on its core business: extraction and processing. This is a key advantage for mining projects in their critical development and production start-up phase.

It is this form of non-predatory prepayment financing that the OCIM Group offers to a growing group of mining operators around the world, supporting their development in a mutually beneficial and virtuous cycle.

ABOUT OCIM

The OCIM group of privately held companies has a long and successful history as a Trader and Financier of Strategic Assets. Established in Paris in 1961, OCIM is headed by a third-generation member of the founding family. Besides its core historical business in Real Estate, OCIM has diversified into other strategic tangible assets such as coinage Precious Metals via its Geneva-based subsidiary. As a Merchant, OCIM trades physical metals across the full value chain, from producers to end users. As a Financier, OCIM invests in a wide variety of instruments and provides financing to the value chain with equity, debt, and alternative investments.

To learn more, visit: www.ocim.eu

CONTACT

Laurence Mathiot
[email protected]
+33 1 88 83 86 17
+33 6 48 79 38 95

To view the source version of this press release, please visit https://www.newsfilecorp.com/release/126949

Fintech

How to identify authenticity in crypto influencer channels

Published

on

 

Modern brands stake on influencer marketing, with 76% of users making a purchase after seeing a product on social media.The cryptocurrency industry is no exception to this trend. However, promoting crypto products through influencer marketing can be particularly challenging. Crypto influencers pose a significant risk to a brand’s reputation and ROI due to rampant scams. Approximately 80% of channels provide fake statistics, including followers counts and engagement metrics. Additionally, this niche is characterized by high CPMs, which can increase the risk of financial loss for brands.

In this article Nadia Bubennnikova, Head of agency Famesters, will explore the most important things to look for in crypto channels to find the perfect match for influencer marketing collaborations.

 

  1. Comments 

There are several levels related to this point.

 

LEVEL 1

Analyze approximately 10 of the channel’s latest videos, looking through the comments to ensure they are not purchased from dubious sources. For example, such comments as “Yes sir, great video!”; “Thanks!”; “Love you man!”; “Quality content”, and others most certainly are bot-generated and should be avoided.

Just to compare: 

LEVEL 2

Don’t rush to conclude that you’ve discovered the perfect crypto channel just because you’ve come across some logical comments that align with the video’s topic. This may seem controversial, but it’s important to dive deeper. When you encounter a channel with logical comments, ensure that they are unique and not duplicated under the description box. Some creators are smarter than just buying comments from the first link that Google shows you when you search “buy YouTube comments”. They generate topics, provide multiple examples, or upload lists of examples, all produced by AI. You can either manually review the comments or use a script to parse all the YouTube comments into an Excel file. Then, add a formula to highlight any duplicates.

LEVEL 3

It is also a must to check the names of the profiles that leave the comments: most of the bot-generated comments are easy to track: they will all have the usernames made of random symbols and numbers, random first and last name combinations, “Habibi”, etc. No profile pictures on all comments is also a red flag.

 

LEVEL 4

Another important factor to consider when assessing comment authenticity is the posting date. If all the comments were posted on the same day, it’s likely that the traffic was purchased.

 

2. Average views number per video

This is indeed one of the key metrics to consider when selecting an influencer for collaboration, regardless of the product type. What specific factors should we focus on?

First & foremost: the views dynamics on the channel. The most desirable type of YouTube channel in terms of views is one that maintains stable viewership across all of its videos. This stability serves as proof of an active and loyal audience genuinely interested in the creator’s content, unlike channels where views vary significantly from one video to another.

Many unauthentic crypto channels not only buy YouTube comments but also invest in increasing video views to create the impression of stability. So, what exactly should we look at in terms of views? Firstly, calculate the average number of views based on the ten latest videos. Then, compare this figure to the views of the most recent videos posted within the past week. If you notice that these new videos have nearly the same number of views as those posted a month or two ago, it’s a clear red flag. Typically, a YouTube channel experiences lower views on new videos, with the number increasing organically each day as the audience engages with the content. If you see a video posted just three days ago already garnering 30k views, matching the total views of older videos, it’s a sign of fraudulent traffic purchased to create the illusion of view stability.

 

3. Influencer’s channel statistics

The primary statistics of interest are region and demographic split, and sometimes the device types of the viewers.

LEVEL 1

When reviewing the shared statistics, the first step is to request a video screencast instead of a simple screenshot. This is because it takes more time to organically edit a video than a screenshot, making it harder to manipulate the statistics. If the creator refuses, step two (if only screenshots are provided) is to download them and check the file’s properties on your computer. Look for details such as whether it was created with Adobe Photoshop or the color profile, typically Adobe RGB, to determine if the screenshot has been edited.

LEVEL 2

After confirming the authenticity of the stats screenshot, it’s crucial to analyze the data. For instance, if you’re examining a channel conducted in Spanish with all videos filmed in the same language, it would raise concerns to find a significant audience from countries like India or Turkey. This discrepancy, where the audience doesn’t align with regions known for speaking the language, is a red flag.

If we’re considering an English-language crypto channel, it typically suggests an international audience, as English’s global use for quality educational content on niche topics like crypto. However, certain considerations apply. For instance, if an English-speaking channel shows a significant percentage of Polish viewers (15% to 30%) without any mention of the Polish language, it could indicate fake followers and views. However, if the channel’s creator is Polish, occasionally posts videos in Polish alongside English, and receives Polish comments, it’s important not to rush to conclusions.

Example of statistics

 

Wrapping up

These are the main factors to consider when selecting an influencer to promote your crypto product. Once you’ve launched the campaign, there are also some markers to show which creators did bring the authentic traffic and which used some tools to create the illusion of an active and engaged audience. While this may seem obvious, it’s still worth mentioning. After the video is posted, allow 5-7 days for it to accumulate a basic number of views, then check performance metrics such as views, clicks, click-through rate (CTR), signups, and conversion rate (CR) from clicks to signups.

If you overlooked some red flags when selecting crypto channels for your launch, you might find the following outcomes: channels with high views numbers and high CTRs, demonstrating the real interest of the audience, yet with remarkably low conversion rates. In the worst-case scenario, you might witness thousands of clicks resulting in zero to just a few signups. While this might suggest technical issues in other industries, in crypto campaigns it indicates that the creator engaged in the campaign not only bought fake views and comments but also link clicks. And this happens more often than you may realize.

Summing up, choosing the right crypto creator to promote your product is indeed a tricky job that requires a lot of resources to be put into the search process. 

Author Nadia Bubennikova, Head of agency  at Famesters

Author

Nadia Bubennikova, Head of agency at Famesters

Continue Reading

Fintech

Central banks and the FinTech sector unite to change global payments space

Published

on

central-banks-and-the-fintech-sector-unite-to-change-global-payments-space

 

The BIS, along with seven leading central banks and a cohort of private financial firms, has embarked on an ambitious venture known as Project Agorá.

Named after the Greek word for “marketplace,” this initiative stands at the forefront of exploring the potential of tokenisation to significantly enhance the operational efficiency of the monetary system worldwide.

Central to this pioneering project are the Bank of France (on behalf of the Eurosystem), the Bank of Japan, the Bank of Korea, the Bank of Mexico, the Swiss National Bank, the Bank of England, and the Federal Reserve Bank of New York. These institutions have joined forces under the banner of Project Agorá, in partnership with an extensive assembly of private financial entities convened by the Institute of International Finance (IIF).

At the heart of Project Agorá is the pursuit of integrating tokenised commercial bank deposits with tokenised wholesale central bank money within a unified, public-private programmable financial platform. By harnessing the advanced capabilities of smart contracts and programmability, the project aspires to unlock new transactional possibilities that were previously infeasible or impractical, thereby fostering novel opportunities that could benefit businesses and consumers alike.

The collaborative effort seeks to address and surmount a variety of structural inefficiencies that currently plague cross-border payments. These challenges include disparate legal, regulatory, and technical standards; varying operating hours and time zones; and the heightened complexity associated with conducting financial integrity checks (such as anti-money laundering and customer verification procedures), which are often redundantly executed across multiple stages of a single transaction due to the involvement of several intermediaries.

As a beacon of experimental and exploratory projects, the BIS Innovation Hub is committed to delivering public goods to the global central banking community through initiatives like Project Agorá. In line with this mission, the BIS will soon issue a call for expressions of interest from private financial institutions eager to contribute to this ground-breaking project. The IIF will facilitate the involvement of private sector participants, extending an invitation to regulated financial institutions representing each of the seven aforementioned currencies to partake in this transformative endeavour.

Source: fintech.globa

The post Central banks and the FinTech sector unite to change global payments space appeared first on HIPTHER Alerts.

Continue Reading

Fintech

TD Bank inks multi-year strategic partnership with Google Cloud

Published

on

td-bank-inks-multi-year-strategic-partnership-with-google-cloud

 

TD Bank has inked a multi-year deal with Google Cloud as it looks to streamline the development and deployment of new products and services.

The deal will see the Canadian banking group integrate the vendor’s cloud services into a wider portion of its technology solutions portfolio, a move which TD expects will enable it “to respond quickly to changing customer expectations by rolling out new features, updates, or entirely new financial products at an accelerated pace”.

This marks an expansion of the already established relationship between TD Bank and Google Cloud after the group previously adopted the vendor’s Google Kubernetes Engine (GKE) for TD Securities Automated Trading (TDSAT), the Chicago-based subsidiary of its investment banking unit, TD Securities.

TDSAT uses GKE for process automation and quantitative modelling across fixed income markets, resulting in the development of a “data-driven research platform” capable of processing large research workloads in trading.

Dan Bosman, SVP and CIO of TD Securities, claims the infrastructure has so far supported TDSAT with “compute-intensive quantitative analysis” while expanding the subsidiary’s “trading volumes and portfolio size”.

TD’s new partnership with Google Cloud will see the group attempt to replicate the same level of success across its entire portfolio.

Source: fintechfutures.com

The post TD Bank inks multi-year strategic partnership with Google Cloud appeared first on HIPTHER Alerts.

Continue Reading

Trending