Connect with us
European Gaming Congress 2024

Latest News

Courageous Whistleblowers Reclaim Derogatory Terms As Data Shows 80% of Financial Professionals Stay Silent on Suspected Internal Fraud, Fearing Retaliation

Published

on

  • Enron whistleblower, Sherron Watkins, alongside stars of Apple TV’s The Big Conn, Sarah Carver and Jennifer Griffith, reclaim derogatory labels for whistleblowers
  • Concerning new data shows more than half of financial professionals in the UK and US have spotted or suspected internal fraud in their workplaces, yet four out of five stay silent fearing retaliation
  • 32% of professionals in finance have seen whistleblowers victimized behind their back or to their face

JACKSONVILLE, Fla., May 22, 2024 /PRNewswire/ — New data from fraud detection software company Medius shows more than half of financial professionals in the UK and US (56%) have spotted or suspected internal fraud in their workplaces yet four in five (81%) stayed silent. When asked why, 45% of professionals cited the fear of recrimination.

Whistleblowers Sherron Watkins, Sarah Carver and Jennifer Griffith have joined forces to reclaim the derogatory names they were called after reporting serious internal financial fraud.

To help empower others to come forward, the whistleblowers are reclaiming the terms “snitch”, “rat” and “traitor”.

Sherron Watkins is the former Vice President of Enron Corporation who alerted the CEO to accounting irregularities, warning the organization “might implode in a wave of accounting scandals.” Watkins received national acclaim for her courageous actions and TIME magazine named her along with two others as their Persons of the Year in 2002, calling them simply ‘The Whistleblowers.’

Sarah Carver and Jennifer Griffith are the stars of Apple TV’s The Big Conn after they exposed a fraud scheme of more than $550 million while employed at the Social Security Administration. In efforts to silence their disclosures, they experienced multiple acts of severe retaliation and were denied protection. Ultimately, both Carver and Griffith were forced from employment.

Concerns of repercussions are vindicated – the survey reveals the extent to which financial professionals in the UK and US have witnessed negative consequences for whistleblowers firsthand:

Advertisement
Stake.com
  • 59% have seen whistleblowers subsequently left out of important decisions
  • 33% have seen whistleblowers moved to a different team
  • 32% have heard whistleblowers called derogatory names behind their backs or directly to their face

When asked what would encourage them to flag suspicious activity, 93% of workers surveyed would feel more comfortable doing so if they had more evidence, yet nearly half (48%) said the legal system simply does not adequately protect whistleblowers.

Jim Lucier, CEO at Medius, a leading global provider of cloud-based accounts payable automation and spend management solutions, said:

“White collar crime is on the rise and no organization is safe. Employees are the last line of defense against fraud but confidence to report suspicious activity is declining. AI anomaly-detection technology can provide employees with the evidence and assurances they need to be more forthcoming. Building a culture where employees feel comfortable to report their suspicions could save organizations millions in the long-run.”

Medius works with over 4,000 customers across 102 countries and processes $200 billion in annual spend. It uses the power of AI and automation to detect fraud, the moment invoices are submitted safeguarding against bad actors and potential threats, internal and external.

Sherron Watkins, whistleblower who was called a “snitch” said: “When someone is troubled by corporate wrongdoing and they attempt to sound the alarm, the pathway is uncharted, things happen organically. Normal rational people speak about their concerns with their closest friends and work colleagues, who often suggest staying safe saying “keep your head down, if you must report, go soft, nothing black and white.” Yet black and white evidence is what is needed to get the attention of those in power, either internally or with media or outside watchdog groups to prevent or stop fraudulent activity.”  

Jennifer Griffith, whistleblower who was called a “traitor” said: “Choosing to blow the whistle involves more than just the desire to right a wrong.  It’s about protecting their employers from fraud. However, it’s more often than not seen as causing trouble for the employer, or as a self-serving action to get a financial reward. No one who chooses to blow the whistle expects to have their reputation attacked, their credibility impugned or to lose their job. The cost of ignoring a whistleblowers complaints are far greater than acknowledging that a problem exists and taking steps to fix it.  It’s been 19 years since I blew the whistle and the problems that existed then with the Social Security Administration still exist today. We must do more to protect whistleblowers.”

Advertisement
Stake.com

Sarah Carver, whistleblower who was called a “rat” said: “The government’s attempt to conceal the fraud resulted in exacerbated damage, whereas a more prudent approach would have entailed immediate acknowledgement and rectification upon initial disclosure. The retaliatory measures aimed at silencing me made me stronger and fight harder to find someone to listen and stop the fraud.”

The billboard advertising campaign runs on Wall Street from Saturday, 18th May to Friday, 24th May 2024.

For more information about how Medius can prevent fraud, visit: https://www.medius.com/whistleblowing/

For more information, please contact:
Fight or Flight for Medius
[email protected] / +44 330 133 0985

This information was brought to you by Cision http://news.cision.com

Advertisement
Stake.com

https://news.cision.com/medius/r/courageous-whistleblowers-reclaim-derogatory-terms-as-data-shows-80–of-financial-professionals-stay,c3985898

 

View original content:https://www.prnewswire.co.uk/news-releases/courageous-whistleblowers-reclaim-derogatory-terms-as-data-shows-80-of-financial-professionals-stay-silent-on-suspected-internal-fraud-fearing-retaliation-302152639.html

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Latest News

Corlytics Hires New CTO, Chief Data Officer, and Chief Tech Architect

Published

on

 

Corlytics, a leading provider of regulatory risk intelligence solutions, has announced the appointment of three key executives: a new Chief Technology Officer (CTO), Chief Data Officer (CDO), and Chief Tech Architect. These strategic hires are set to bolster Corlytics’ capabilities and drive its mission to deliver cutting-edge regulatory risk intelligence.

The New Appointments

Corlytics’ latest appointments include highly experienced professionals who bring a wealth of knowledge and expertise to the company.

Advertisement
Stake.com

Key Appointments:

  • Chief Technology Officer (CTO): The new CTO will oversee the company’s technology strategy, ensuring that Corlytics remains at the forefront of innovation in regulatory risk intelligence.
  • Chief Data Officer (CDO): The CDO will be responsible for managing and leveraging data to enhance Corlytics’ solutions, providing clients with deeper insights into regulatory risks.
  • Chief Tech Architect: The Chief Tech Architect will focus on the technical architecture of Corlytics’ platforms, ensuring scalability, reliability, and security.

Enhancing Regulatory Risk Intelligence

With these strategic hires, Corlytics aims to enhance its regulatory risk intelligence offerings, providing clients with more comprehensive and actionable insights.

Enhanced Capabilities:

  • Advanced Analytics: Leveraging advanced analytics to provide deeper insights into regulatory risks and trends.
  • Data Integration: Improving data integration capabilities to provide a holistic view of regulatory risks across various jurisdictions and sectors.
  • Scalable Solutions: Developing scalable solutions that can grow with clients’ needs, ensuring they remain compliant in an evolving regulatory landscape.

The Importance of Regulatory Risk Intelligence

In today’s complex regulatory environment, effective regulatory risk intelligence is crucial for financial institutions and other regulated entities.

Key Benefits:

Advertisement
Stake.com
  • Risk Mitigation: Identifying and mitigating regulatory risks before they materialize can save organizations from significant financial and reputational damage.
  • Compliance Management: Enhancing compliance management processes to ensure adherence to evolving regulations.
  • Strategic Decision-Making: Providing data-driven insights that support strategic decision-making and long-term planning.

Corlytics’ Strategic Vision

The new hires align with Corlytics’ strategic vision of becoming a global leader in regulatory risk intelligence, leveraging technology and data to transform how organizations manage regulatory compliance.

Strategic Goals:

  • Innovation: Continuing to innovate and develop cutting-edge solutions that address the evolving needs of clients.
  • Global Expansion: Expanding Corlytics’ presence in key markets around the world.
  • Client Focus: Maintaining a strong focus on client needs, delivering solutions that provide tangible value and support regulatory compliance efforts.

Future Prospects

With the addition of the new executives, Corlytics is well-positioned to drive future growth and innovation in the regulatory risk intelligence space. The company plans to leverage its enhanced capabilities to expand its market reach and deliver even greater value to clients.

Growth Opportunities:

  • Product Development: Developing new products and features that address emerging regulatory risks and challenges.
  • Partnerships: Forming strategic partnerships with other technology providers and regulatory bodies to enhance Corlytics’ solutions.
  • Market Penetration: Increasing market penetration by targeting new industries and geographic regions.

Conclusion

The appointment of a new CTO, CDO, and Chief Tech Architect marks a significant milestone for Corlytics. These strategic hires will enhance the company’s capabilities, driving innovation and delivering greater value to clients. As Corlytics continues to expand and innovate, it is well-positioned to lead the regulatory risk intelligence market and support organizations in managing their regulatory compliance challenges.

Advertisement
Stake.com

Source of the news: Fintech Futures

 

The post Corlytics Hires New CTO, Chief Data Officer, and Chief Tech Architect appeared first on HIPTHER Alerts.

Continue Reading

Latest News

Instant Payments Regulation: Overview for Banks and Corporate Treasurers

Published

on

 

The regulation of instant payments is becoming increasingly important as both banks and corporate treasurers seek to leverage faster, more efficient payment solutions. This article provides an overview of instant payments regulation, highlighting the key considerations and implications for banks and corporate treasurers.

What Are Instant Payments?

Instant payments refer to electronic payments that are processed in real-time or near real-time, enabling the transfer of funds between accounts within seconds. These payments can be initiated and completed at any time, providing convenience and efficiency for both individuals and businesses.

Advertisement
Stake.com

Key Characteristics:

  • Speed: Funds are transferred almost instantly, reducing the time taken for payment settlement.
  • Availability: Instant payments can be made 24/7, including weekends and holidays.
  • Irrevocability: Once initiated, instant payments cannot be reversed, ensuring finality of the transaction.

Regulatory Landscape

The regulation of instant payments varies across different jurisdictions, with a focus on ensuring security, efficiency, and interoperability of payment systems.

Key Regulations:

  • EU Regulation on Instant Payments: The EU has implemented specific regulations to promote the adoption of instant payments, ensuring that payment service providers offer these services to customers.
  • PSD2: The Second Payment Services Directive (PSD2) in the EU includes provisions that support the development and regulation of instant payments.
  • Local Regulations: Various countries have their own regulations and guidelines to govern instant payments, focusing on aspects such as fraud prevention, consumer protection, and technical standards.

Implications for Banks

Banks play a critical role in the provision of instant payments and must navigate the regulatory landscape to ensure compliance and provide seamless services to customers.

Key Considerations for Banks:

Advertisement
Stake.com
  • Compliance: Banks must comply with relevant regulations and guidelines to offer instant payment services. This includes adhering to technical standards and implementing robust security measures.
  • Infrastructure: Investing in the necessary infrastructure to support real-time payment processing and ensure system reliability and availability.
  • Customer Education: Educating customers about the benefits and features of instant payments, as well as any potential risks associated with their use.

Implications for Corporate Treasurers

Corporate treasurers can benefit significantly from the adoption of instant payments, which can enhance cash flow management and improve operational efficiency.

Key Considerations for Corporate Treasurers:

  • Cash Flow Management: Instant payments can improve cash flow management by reducing the time taken for payment settlement and providing real-time visibility into account balances.
  • Operational Efficiency: Faster payment processing can streamline business operations, reducing administrative burdens and improving supplier relationships.
  • Risk Management: Corporate treasurers must be aware of the irrevocability of instant payments and implement appropriate controls to prevent fraudulent transactions.

Benefits of Instant Payments

The adoption of instant payments offers several benefits for both banks and corporate treasurers, driving efficiency and enhancing the customer experience.

Key Benefits:

  • Convenience: Instant payments provide a convenient and efficient way to transfer funds, reducing the reliance on traditional payment methods.
  • Cost Savings: Faster payment processing can reduce the costs associated with payment settlement and reconciliation.
  • Enhanced Customer Experience: Offering instant payment services can enhance the customer experience, providing greater flexibility and speed in financial transactions.

Challenges and Future Trends

While instant payments offer numerous benefits, there are also challenges that banks and corporate treasurers must address to fully leverage these services.

Advertisement
Stake.com

Key Challenges:

  • Security Risks: Ensuring the security of instant payments is critical, particularly given the speed and irrevocability of transactions.
  • Interoperability: Achieving interoperability between different payment systems and networks is essential for the widespread adoption of instant payments.
  • Regulatory Compliance: Navigating the complex regulatory landscape and ensuring compliance with relevant regulations can be challenging.

Future Trends:

  • Increased Adoption: The adoption of instant payments is expected to continue growing, driven by regulatory support and customer demand.
  • Technological Advancements: Advances in technology, such as blockchain and artificial intelligence, are likely to further enhance the capabilities and security of instant payments.
  • Global Standardization: Efforts to develop global standards for instant payments will promote interoperability and facilitate cross-border transactions.

Conclusion

The regulation of instant payments is crucial for ensuring the security, efficiency, and interoperability of payment systems. Banks and corporate treasurers must navigate the regulatory landscape and invest in the necessary infrastructure to provide seamless and secure instant payment services. As the adoption of instant payments continues to grow, it offers significant benefits for enhancing cash flow management, operational efficiency, and the overall customer experience.

Source of the news: The Paypers

The post Instant Payments Regulation: Overview for Banks and Corporate Treasurers appeared first on HIPTHER Alerts.

Advertisement
Stake.com
Continue Reading

Latest News

Regulators Issue Joint Warning on Bank-Fintech Risks

Published

on

 

Regulators have issued a joint warning highlighting the risks associated with partnerships between banks and fintech companies. This warning underscores the need for careful management of these relationships to ensure regulatory compliance and mitigate potential risks.

Overview of the Joint Warning

The joint warning, issued by a coalition of financial regulators, emphasizes the importance of robust risk management practices when banks partner with fintech companies. These partnerships, while beneficial in driving innovation and enhancing customer services, also introduce new risks that must be addressed.

Advertisement
Stake.com

Key Points of the Warning:

  • Regulatory Compliance: Banks must ensure that fintech partners comply with all relevant regulations and standards.
  • Risk Management: Robust risk management frameworks must be in place to identify, assess, and mitigate risks associated with fintech partnerships.
  • Data Security: Ensuring the security and privacy of customer data is paramount, particularly given the increasing prevalence of cyber threats.
  • Operational Resilience: Banks must ensure that fintech partnerships do not compromise their operational resilience and ability to deliver critical services.

Benefits of Bank-Fintech Partnerships

Despite the risks, partnerships between banks and fintech companies offer significant benefits, driving innovation and enhancing the customer experience.

Key Benefits:

  • Innovation: Fintech companies bring innovative technologies and solutions that can enhance banking services and products.
  • Customer Experience: Partnerships with fintechs can improve the customer experience by offering faster, more efficient, and personalized services.
  • Cost Efficiency: Fintech solutions can help banks reduce costs and improve operational efficiency through automation and digitalization.

Risks Associated with Bank-Fintech Partnerships

The joint warning highlights several risks associated with bank-fintech partnerships that must be carefully managed.

Key Risks:

Advertisement
Stake.com
  • Regulatory Risk: Ensuring compliance with complex and evolving regulatory requirements is a significant challenge.
  • Cybersecurity Risk: Fintech partnerships can introduce cybersecurity vulnerabilities, making it essential to implement robust security measures.
  • Operational Risk: The integration of fintech solutions into banking operations can pose operational risks, particularly if not managed effectively.
  • Reputational Risk: Any issues or failures in fintech partnerships can damage the bank’s reputation and customer trust.

Strategies for Managing Risks

To mitigate the risks associated with fintech partnerships, banks must adopt comprehensive risk management strategies and ensure rigorous oversight.

Key Strategies:

  • Due Diligence: Conducting thorough due diligence on fintech partners to assess their regulatory compliance, security practices, and financial stability.
  • Contractual Safeguards: Including robust contractual safeguards in partnership agreements to outline responsibilities, expectations, and compliance requirements.
  • Continuous Monitoring: Implementing continuous monitoring and assessment of fintech partnerships to identify and address emerging risks.
  • Collaboration with Regulators:: Engaging with regulators to ensure that partnerships comply with regulatory requirements and to stay informed of any changes in the regulatory landscape.

The Role of Technology

Technology plays a crucial role in managing the risks associated with bank-fintech partnerships, offering tools and solutions that enhance oversight and compliance.

Key Technologies:

  • RegTech Solutions: Regulatory technology (RegTech) solutions can automate compliance processes, ensuring that fintech partnerships adhere to regulatory requirements.
  • Cybersecurity Tools: Advanced cybersecurity tools and solutions can enhance the security of fintech partnerships, protecting against cyber threats.
  • Risk Management Platforms: Integrated risk management platforms can provide real-time visibility into partnership risks and support proactive risk mitigation.

Conclusion

The joint warning issued by regulators highlights the need for careful management of bank-fintech partnerships to ensure regulatory compliance and mitigate potential risks. While these partnerships offer significant benefits, including innovation and enhanced customer experience, they also introduce new risks that must be addressed through robust risk management strategies. By leveraging technology and engaging with regulators, banks can effectively manage these risks and capitalize on the opportunities presented by fintech partnerships.

Advertisement
Stake.com

Source of the news: American Banker

The post Regulators Issue Joint Warning on Bank-Fintech Risks appeared first on HIPTHER Alerts.

Continue Reading

Trending