Connect with us
MARE BALTICUM Gaming & TECH Summit 2024

Fintech

Gold Fund Holdings Update – September 2022 and Attribution Analysis

Published

on

Toronto, Ontario–(Newsfile Corp. – October 14, 2022) – This report details the most recent portfolio holdings for Precious Metal Managed Funds and summarizes changes in portfolio holdings.

A Copy of the Full Report is Available to Read by Following the Link Below: 
https://mineralfunds/portfolio-holdings-update-september-2022

Gold & Precious Metal Funds included in this report:

Domicile Fund Name Fund Fees Holdings Report
Funds Reporting Monthly
USA Fidelity Select Gold Fund Summary Jul, 2022
USA Franklin Gold & Precious Metals Fund (USA) Summary Aug, 2022
Luxembourg Franklin Gold and Precious Metals Fund (Lux) Summary Aug, 2022
USA VanEck International Investors Gold Fund Summary Aug, 2022
USA VanEck VIP Global Gold Fund Summary Aug, 2022
      
Funds Reporting Quarterly
USA Sprott Gold Equity Fund Summary Jun, 2022
USA Rydex Precious Metals Fund Summary Jun, 2022
      
Funds Reporting Annually / Semi Annually
Canada RBC Global Precious Metals Fund Summary Jun, 2022
Canada Ninepoint Gold & Precious Minerals Fund Summary Jun, 2022
Canada TD Precious Metals Fund Summary Jun, 2022
Canada CIBC Precious Metals Fund Summary Jun, 2022
Canada NBI Precious Metals Fund Summary Jun, 2022
Luxembourg BAKERSTEEL Precious Metals Fund Summary Jun, 2022
Luxembourg CPR Invest – Global Gold Mines Summary Jun, 2022
Luxembourg STABILITAS Pacific Gold+Metals Summary Jun, 2022
Luxembourg Stabilitas Gold+Resourcen Special Situations Summary Jun, 2022
Luxembourg DJE Gold & Ressourcen Summary Jun, 2022
Luxembourg iW Precious Metal Mining Equities Fund Summary Jun, 2022
Luxembourg Landolt Investment (Lux) SICAV – Gold Summary Jun, 2022
Luxembourg Crossinvest Metals and Mining Equity Summary Jun, 2022
France Rothschild & Co. Thematic Gold Mines Summary Jun, 2022
France Crédit Mutuel CIC Global Gold Summary Mar, 2022
France Ixios Gold Fund Summary Jun, 2022
Bermuda Jupiter Gold & Silver Fund Summary Jun, 2022
Switzerland AMG Gold, Minen und Metalle Summary Jun, 2022
Switzerland Precious Capital Global Mining and Metals Fund Summary Jun, 2022
Switzerland Sprott-Alpina Gold Equity Fund Summary Jun, 2022
Liechtenstein Craton Capital Precious Metal Fund Summary Jun, 2022
Liechtenstein Premium Gold and Metal Open Fund Summary Jun, 2022
Singapore DWS Noor Precious Metal Securities Fund Summary Jun, 2022
Finland Zenito Silver and Gold Fund Summary Jun, 2022
Sweden AuAg Precious Green Summary Jun, 2022
Germany Value Intelligence Gold Company Fonds Summary Jun, 2022

 

A portfolio holding ‘attribution analysis‘ is undertaken on the portfolios of gold funds that report asset allocations monthly, and on any fund with assets in excess of $1 Billion USD reporting during the period.

The analysis includes a list of companies which are new to a portfolio in the period ‘New Company Holdings’, and companies which have been eliminated from a portfolio during the period ‘Companies Divested’. ‘Increasing Shareholding’ and ‘Decreasing Shareholding’ fields identify companies to which a fund is either increasing or, alternatively, decreasing exposure.

FUNDS REPORTING MONTHLY

Fidelity Select Gold Fund

31.Jul.2022 $1,325 M USD  
 
New Company Holdings Companies Divested  
None None  
 
Largest Position:  
Newmont Corp. (NYSE: NEM) 12.4%  
 

 

Franklin Gold & Precious Metals Fund (USA)    Franklin Gold and Precious Metals Fund (Lux)
31.Aug.2022   $903 M USD   31.Aug.2022   $352 M USD
            
New Company Holdings   Companies Divested   New Company Holdings   Companies Divested
Moneta Gold Inc.   Gold Standard Ventures Corp.   Moneta Gold Inc.   Gold Standard Ventures Corp.
            
Largest Position:     Largest Position:  
Endeavor Mining (TSX: EDV)   5.3%   Endeavor Mining (TSX: EDV)   5.7%
             
Increasing Shareholding   Decreasing Shareholding   Increasing Shareholding   Decreasing Shareholding
Orla Mining Ltd.   Eastern Platinum Ltd.   Integra Resources Corp.   Gascoyne Resources Ltd.
O3 Mining Inc.   Gascoyne Resources Ltd.   Matador Mining Ltd.   Perseus Mining Ltd.
  Perseus Mining Ltd.   Orla Mining Ltd.  

 

VanEck International Investors Gold Fund   VanEck VIP Global Gold Fund
31.Aug.2022   $611 M USD   31.Aug.2022   $39 M USD
     
New Company Holdings   Companies Divested   New Company Holdings   Companies Divested
None   None   None   None
     
Largest Position:     Largest Position:  
Franco-Nevada Crp. (TSX: FNV)   9.5%   Franco-Nevada Crp. (TSX: FNV)   9.2%
     
Increasing Shareholding   Decreasing Shareholding   Increasing Shareholding   Decreasing Shareholding
None   BonTerra Resources Inc.   None   BonTerra Resources Inc.
  Nighthawk Gold Corp.     Nighthawk Gold Corp.
  Wallbridge Mining Co. Ltd.     Wallbridge Mining Co. Ltd.
  Perpetua Resources Corp.     Perpetua Resources Corp.
      Franco-Nevada Corporation
      Agnico Eagle Mines Limited
      Endeavour Mining PLC
      Barrick Gold Corporation
      Newmont Corporation
      Wheaton Precious Metals Corp
      B2Gold Corp.
      Kinross Gold Corporation
      Yamana Gold Inc.
      Northern Star Resources Ltd
      Alamos Gold Inc.
      SSR Mining Inc.
      Royal Gold Inc.
      Evolution Mining Ltd.
      Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd.
      Eldorado Gold Corporation
      Equinox Gold Corp.

 

FUNDS REPORTING MONTHLY      ATTRIBUTION ANALYSIS

AUM in all monthly reporting gold funds decreased through July and August respectively.

Fidelity Select Gold Fund
AUM for Fidelity Gold Fund decreased in July from $1,380 M USD to $1,325 M USD (-4.0%).

A significant decrease in value for the Fund’s largest holding Newmont Corporation (NYSE: NEM) (-26.5% on the month) which began the month $61.17 USD and closed the month at $44.94 USD contributed to a relative decrease in the largest holding from 15.0% to 12.4%. The Fund did not take on any new names and did not complete full liquidation of any existing positions during the month.

Franklin Gold & Precious Metals Fund (USA)
AUM for Franklin Gold and Precious Metals Fund (USA) decreased in August from $986 M USD to $903 M USD (-8.4%).

The Fund took up a new position in Moneta Gold Inc. (TSX: ME). During the month Moneta Gold reported high-grade intercepts at the Tower Gold Project near Timmins, Ontario. Subsequent to month end Moneta reported a positive PEA and an updated NI 43-101 report for the Tower Gold Project in Ontario. The Fund increased positioning in junior producer Orla Mining Ltd. (TSX: OLA) which closed on the acquisition of Gold Standard Ventures Corp. (NYSE: GSV) on August 12th. The Fund also increased positioning in Osisko Group company O3 Mining Inc. (TSXV: OIII).

The Fund reduced holdings in: Eastern Platinum Ltd. (TSX: ELR), Gascoyne Resources Ltd. (ASX: GYC) and Perseus Mining Ltd. (TSX: PRU). On September 23rd, subsequent to month end, Eastern Platinum Ltd. announced a financing facility with Investec Bank Ltd.

Franklin Gold and Precious Metals Fund (Lux) increased exposure to Integra Resources Corp. (CVE: ITR) which closed an oversubscribed financing on August 4th, 2022, and which continues to advance permitting for the DeLamar Gold-Silver Project. The Luxembourg based Fund also increased exposure to Australian listed Matador Mining Ltd. (ASX: MZZ) which is exploring for high-grade gold in the jurisdiction of Newfoundland, Canada.

VanEck International Investors Gold Fund
AUM for VanEck International Investors Gold Fund decreased in August from $687 M USD to $611 M USD (-11.1%).

The Fund did not add any new holdings and did not increase positioning in any holdings. The Fund continued to reduce holdings of Nighthawk Gold Corp. (TSX: NHK) and Wallbridge Mining Co. Ltd. (TSX: WM), and also began reducing its holdings of BonTerra Resources Inc. (CVE: BTR) and Perpetua Resources Corp. (TSX: PPTA).

VanEck VIP Global Gold Fund
AUM for VanEck VIP Global Gold Fund decreased in August from $44 M USD to $39 M USD (-11.4%).

The Fund did not add any new positions or increase positioning in any gold company names. The Fund reduced positioning in 21 of 51 holdings. VanEck VIP Global Gold Fund mirrors VanEck International Investors Fund.

A complete list of Precious Metal Managed Funds and their respective portfolio holdings can be found at:
https://mineralfunds.com/gold-funds/

Reported by: Khadijah Samnani, Analyst      Supported By: Christopher Berlet BSc, CFA

For further information please contact:
(416) 525 – 6869
[email protected]

To view the source version of this press release, please visit https://www.newsfilecorp.com/release/140595

Fintech

How to identify authenticity in crypto influencer channels

Published

on

 

Modern brands stake on influencer marketing, with 76% of users making a purchase after seeing a product on social media.The cryptocurrency industry is no exception to this trend. However, promoting crypto products through influencer marketing can be particularly challenging. Crypto influencers pose a significant risk to a brand’s reputation and ROI due to rampant scams. Approximately 80% of channels provide fake statistics, including followers counts and engagement metrics. Additionally, this niche is characterized by high CPMs, which can increase the risk of financial loss for brands.

In this article Nadia Bubennnikova, Head of agency Famesters, will explore the most important things to look for in crypto channels to find the perfect match for influencer marketing collaborations.

 

  1. Comments 

There are several levels related to this point.

 

LEVEL 1

Analyze approximately 10 of the channel’s latest videos, looking through the comments to ensure they are not purchased from dubious sources. For example, such comments as “Yes sir, great video!”; “Thanks!”; “Love you man!”; “Quality content”, and others most certainly are bot-generated and should be avoided.

Just to compare: 

LEVEL 2

Don’t rush to conclude that you’ve discovered the perfect crypto channel just because you’ve come across some logical comments that align with the video’s topic. This may seem controversial, but it’s important to dive deeper. When you encounter a channel with logical comments, ensure that they are unique and not duplicated under the description box. Some creators are smarter than just buying comments from the first link that Google shows you when you search “buy YouTube comments”. They generate topics, provide multiple examples, or upload lists of examples, all produced by AI. You can either manually review the comments or use a script to parse all the YouTube comments into an Excel file. Then, add a formula to highlight any duplicates.

LEVEL 3

It is also a must to check the names of the profiles that leave the comments: most of the bot-generated comments are easy to track: they will all have the usernames made of random symbols and numbers, random first and last name combinations, “Habibi”, etc. No profile pictures on all comments is also a red flag.

 

LEVEL 4

Another important factor to consider when assessing comment authenticity is the posting date. If all the comments were posted on the same day, it’s likely that the traffic was purchased.

 

2. Average views number per video

This is indeed one of the key metrics to consider when selecting an influencer for collaboration, regardless of the product type. What specific factors should we focus on?

First & foremost: the views dynamics on the channel. The most desirable type of YouTube channel in terms of views is one that maintains stable viewership across all of its videos. This stability serves as proof of an active and loyal audience genuinely interested in the creator’s content, unlike channels where views vary significantly from one video to another.

Many unauthentic crypto channels not only buy YouTube comments but also invest in increasing video views to create the impression of stability. So, what exactly should we look at in terms of views? Firstly, calculate the average number of views based on the ten latest videos. Then, compare this figure to the views of the most recent videos posted within the past week. If you notice that these new videos have nearly the same number of views as those posted a month or two ago, it’s a clear red flag. Typically, a YouTube channel experiences lower views on new videos, with the number increasing organically each day as the audience engages with the content. If you see a video posted just three days ago already garnering 30k views, matching the total views of older videos, it’s a sign of fraudulent traffic purchased to create the illusion of view stability.

 

3. Influencer’s channel statistics

The primary statistics of interest are region and demographic split, and sometimes the device types of the viewers.

LEVEL 1

When reviewing the shared statistics, the first step is to request a video screencast instead of a simple screenshot. This is because it takes more time to organically edit a video than a screenshot, making it harder to manipulate the statistics. If the creator refuses, step two (if only screenshots are provided) is to download them and check the file’s properties on your computer. Look for details such as whether it was created with Adobe Photoshop or the color profile, typically Adobe RGB, to determine if the screenshot has been edited.

LEVEL 2

After confirming the authenticity of the stats screenshot, it’s crucial to analyze the data. For instance, if you’re examining a channel conducted in Spanish with all videos filmed in the same language, it would raise concerns to find a significant audience from countries like India or Turkey. This discrepancy, where the audience doesn’t align with regions known for speaking the language, is a red flag.

If we’re considering an English-language crypto channel, it typically suggests an international audience, as English’s global use for quality educational content on niche topics like crypto. However, certain considerations apply. For instance, if an English-speaking channel shows a significant percentage of Polish viewers (15% to 30%) without any mention of the Polish language, it could indicate fake followers and views. However, if the channel’s creator is Polish, occasionally posts videos in Polish alongside English, and receives Polish comments, it’s important not to rush to conclusions.

Example of statistics

 

Wrapping up

These are the main factors to consider when selecting an influencer to promote your crypto product. Once you’ve launched the campaign, there are also some markers to show which creators did bring the authentic traffic and which used some tools to create the illusion of an active and engaged audience. While this may seem obvious, it’s still worth mentioning. After the video is posted, allow 5-7 days for it to accumulate a basic number of views, then check performance metrics such as views, clicks, click-through rate (CTR), signups, and conversion rate (CR) from clicks to signups.

If you overlooked some red flags when selecting crypto channels for your launch, you might find the following outcomes: channels with high views numbers and high CTRs, demonstrating the real interest of the audience, yet with remarkably low conversion rates. In the worst-case scenario, you might witness thousands of clicks resulting in zero to just a few signups. While this might suggest technical issues in other industries, in crypto campaigns it indicates that the creator engaged in the campaign not only bought fake views and comments but also link clicks. And this happens more often than you may realize.

Summing up, choosing the right crypto creator to promote your product is indeed a tricky job that requires a lot of resources to be put into the search process. 

Author Nadia Bubennikova, Head of agency  at Famesters

Author

Nadia Bubennikova, Head of agency at Famesters

Continue Reading

Fintech

Central banks and the FinTech sector unite to change global payments space

Published

on

central-banks-and-the-fintech-sector-unite-to-change-global-payments-space

 

The BIS, along with seven leading central banks and a cohort of private financial firms, has embarked on an ambitious venture known as Project Agorá.

Named after the Greek word for “marketplace,” this initiative stands at the forefront of exploring the potential of tokenisation to significantly enhance the operational efficiency of the monetary system worldwide.

Central to this pioneering project are the Bank of France (on behalf of the Eurosystem), the Bank of Japan, the Bank of Korea, the Bank of Mexico, the Swiss National Bank, the Bank of England, and the Federal Reserve Bank of New York. These institutions have joined forces under the banner of Project Agorá, in partnership with an extensive assembly of private financial entities convened by the Institute of International Finance (IIF).

At the heart of Project Agorá is the pursuit of integrating tokenised commercial bank deposits with tokenised wholesale central bank money within a unified, public-private programmable financial platform. By harnessing the advanced capabilities of smart contracts and programmability, the project aspires to unlock new transactional possibilities that were previously infeasible or impractical, thereby fostering novel opportunities that could benefit businesses and consumers alike.

The collaborative effort seeks to address and surmount a variety of structural inefficiencies that currently plague cross-border payments. These challenges include disparate legal, regulatory, and technical standards; varying operating hours and time zones; and the heightened complexity associated with conducting financial integrity checks (such as anti-money laundering and customer verification procedures), which are often redundantly executed across multiple stages of a single transaction due to the involvement of several intermediaries.

As a beacon of experimental and exploratory projects, the BIS Innovation Hub is committed to delivering public goods to the global central banking community through initiatives like Project Agorá. In line with this mission, the BIS will soon issue a call for expressions of interest from private financial institutions eager to contribute to this ground-breaking project. The IIF will facilitate the involvement of private sector participants, extending an invitation to regulated financial institutions representing each of the seven aforementioned currencies to partake in this transformative endeavour.

Source: fintech.globa

The post Central banks and the FinTech sector unite to change global payments space appeared first on HIPTHER Alerts.

Continue Reading

Fintech

TD Bank inks multi-year strategic partnership with Google Cloud

Published

on

td-bank-inks-multi-year-strategic-partnership-with-google-cloud

 

TD Bank has inked a multi-year deal with Google Cloud as it looks to streamline the development and deployment of new products and services.

The deal will see the Canadian banking group integrate the vendor’s cloud services into a wider portion of its technology solutions portfolio, a move which TD expects will enable it “to respond quickly to changing customer expectations by rolling out new features, updates, or entirely new financial products at an accelerated pace”.

This marks an expansion of the already established relationship between TD Bank and Google Cloud after the group previously adopted the vendor’s Google Kubernetes Engine (GKE) for TD Securities Automated Trading (TDSAT), the Chicago-based subsidiary of its investment banking unit, TD Securities.

TDSAT uses GKE for process automation and quantitative modelling across fixed income markets, resulting in the development of a “data-driven research platform” capable of processing large research workloads in trading.

Dan Bosman, SVP and CIO of TD Securities, claims the infrastructure has so far supported TDSAT with “compute-intensive quantitative analysis” while expanding the subsidiary’s “trading volumes and portfolio size”.

TD’s new partnership with Google Cloud will see the group attempt to replicate the same level of success across its entire portfolio.

Source: fintechfutures.com

The post TD Bank inks multi-year strategic partnership with Google Cloud appeared first on HIPTHER Alerts.

Continue Reading

Trending